Med referanse til dagens X22-rapport. Torsdagens votering noe bedre forklart
Som nevnt i X22-rapporten den 28. --> https://finansavisen.no/forum/post/1100351
The House Judiciary Committee previously won the legal ruling --for the unredacted Muller-report-- from DC judge Beryl Howell --> https://cnn.it/31S7N79
The reason they want this is, that they're continuing searching for the specific purpose of writing articles of impeachment. Weissman and crew(the Muller-team) built the illusion of obstruction blended with some radical legal theories. That's the material Nadler Lawfair want now! The DoJ will appeal judge Howells precedent-setting ruling to the DC Appellate Court.
Nadler: “This grand jury information that the Administration has tried to block the House from seeing will be critical to our work.”
https://bit.ly/2Jxt7Is
Democrats believe the still-redacted information in the Muller-Report could shed new light on key episodes of the investigation.
Including:
1) Discussions Trump is reported to have had with associates, about the release of stolen emails during the campaign.
2) Conversations about a 2016 Trump Tower meeting. (Trump’s eldest son expected to receive damaging information about Hillary Clinton)
The judge ordered the Justice Department to give the House secret grand jury, testimony from special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation
The DoJ have appealed judge Howells precedent-setting ruling to the DC Appellate Court.
And that is also why Pelosi is in a hurry.
Pelosi og Schiff's plan A - Ukraina Pay for Play- feilet. Dette må anses som Pelosi & Schiff's plan B. Å finne, eller de mener å ha funnet dritt i Muller-Rapporten.
On Thursday there will be a House vote to authorize: --> https://bit.ly/34im66C
…”ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry
into whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its Constitutional power to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America, and for other purposes.”
Og det de vil basere dette på må da være innhold de mener er tilstede i den usensurerte Muller-Rapporten.
Som nevnt i X22-rapporten den 28. --> https://finansavisen.no/forum/post/1100351
The House Judiciary Committee previously won the legal ruling --for the unredacted Muller-report-- from DC judge Beryl Howell --> https://cnn.it/31S7N79
The reason they want this is, that they're continuing searching for the specific purpose of writing articles of impeachment. Weissman and crew(the Muller-team) built the illusion of obstruction blended with some radical legal theories. That's the material Nadler Lawfair want now! The DoJ will appeal judge Howells precedent-setting ruling to the DC Appellate Court.
Nadler: “This grand jury information that the Administration has tried to block the House from seeing will be critical to our work.”
https://bit.ly/2Jxt7Is
Democrats believe the still-redacted information in the Muller-Report could shed new light on key episodes of the investigation.
Including:
1) Discussions Trump is reported to have had with associates, about the release of stolen emails during the campaign.
2) Conversations about a 2016 Trump Tower meeting. (Trump’s eldest son expected to receive damaging information about Hillary Clinton)
The judge ordered the Justice Department to give the House secret grand jury, testimony from special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation
The DoJ have appealed judge Howells precedent-setting ruling to the DC Appellate Court.
And that is also why Pelosi is in a hurry.
Pelosi og Schiff's plan A - Ukraina Pay for Play- feilet. Dette må anses som Pelosi & Schiff's plan B. Å finne, eller de mener å ha funnet dritt i Muller-Rapporten.
On Thursday there will be a House vote to authorize: --> https://bit.ly/34im66C
…”ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry
into whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its Constitutional power to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America, and for other purposes.”
Og det de vil basere dette på må da være innhold de mener er tilstede i den usensurerte Muller-Rapporten.
Redigert 30.10.2019 kl 16:55
Du må logge inn for å svare