🤔😎

hvis regeringen fastholder for budet bliver erstatningen astronomisk.

Denne saken setter standarden for resten av selskapene som venter på sin rettsak, QEC inkludert.

Bærre lækkert. Game on.

:)

👍😯

"Quebec Court rules in favour of Utica Resources" 😁

I did not include the latter in the article because that they have asked what an environmental organization thinks about the subject and they clearly have no sense of international compensation law

This will no doubt strengthen the QEC case and also in any compensation negotiations with the Quebec government😁






The Court of Quebec ruled in favor of Gaspé Énergies

Monday 15th November 2021 05:19 PM


This judgment of the Court of Quebec is the first legal test of the new Hydrocarbons Law adopted in 2016 and the regulations adopted by the Liberals in September 2018.

The Gaspé Énergies permit application was also the very first to be studied under this legislation.

According to the court, Minister Jonatan Julien could not refuse a drilling permit for the Galt No. 6 well, near Gaspé, under article 23 of the Regulation respecting exploration, production and storage activities. ‘hydrocarbons.

The article determines the distances to be respected between a borehole and the water environment. It is on the basis of this article that Minister Julien said no in October 2020 to the drilling authorization request from Gaspé Énergies, a subsidiary of Ressource Utica.

Art. 23

The holder of a license may not carry out the activities referred to in section 22 less than 1000 m from a water environment. However, the Minister may reduce this distance if the holder demonstrates to him that his activities do not compromise the integrity and conservation of the water environment.

At the request of the Minister, the holder supports his demonstration by submitting a technical-environmental study signed by an engineer from a consulting engineering firm independent of all the holder’s companies.

In a long judgment rendered Friday, Judge Christian Boutin states in particular that section 23 was not published in draft form before its adoption and thus contravenes the Regulations Act.

The article must be declared inoperative to judge the request from Gaspé Énergies.

The judge added that the minister did not give sufficient reasons for his refusal.

The court therefore referred the case back to the ministry so that it could decide on the drilling authorization request, taking into account the judgment.




Discretionary power

During the hearings last March, Gaspé Énergies, a subsidiary of Utica Resources, argued that Minister Julien did not have the power to refuse the drilling authorization if officials from his department deemed that the integrity and conservation of the site’s watercourses were not compromised. The oil company also argued that the regulations constituted an illegal delegation of power.

According to government prosecutors, the regulations gave the minister discretionary power. This is also what was defended, among others, the Quebec Center for Environmental Law (CQDE), which had registered as an interested party during the trial which took place last March.

The judge recognized that section 23 confers a certain discretion on the Minister, but did not wish to analyze other elements raised by Gaspé Énergies such as the fact that it was an imprecise regulation and that the decision of the minister was political and not scientific.

The judgment mentions the numerous exchanges between the ministry and Gaspé Énergies in order to document the request. The emails and correspondence show that until September 2, Gaspé Énergies’ request was heading towards a favorable response.

It is at this time that Minister Julien will take cognizance of the file. The request will be refused on October 20.


https://new.in-24.com/News/amp/316392

 

Utroligt
jeg må sige at der skulle komme en dom denne vej havde jeg kun kunnet håbe på !
QC er da noget at det mest korrupte Canada kan byde på !

MEGET POSITIVT !

Puha SP, denne dom passer vel ikke helt ind i din agenda? hahahahahahahahaha

😂😂😂 ja fin kursutvikling på det du mener er en god nyhet..

Herlig!!

Ja du kan bare tenke deg hvilken rakett dette blir når saken blir klar og finansnyhetene her hjemme skriver om det på vegne av QEC, da smeller det SP, så den som ler sist ler best som det heter :-)

Ordner seg til slutt vettu 🤑🤑🤑

Ja dette for en si var meget spennende nyheter så jeg gleder meg til fortsettelsen :)

Ja, lad os nu se, hvem der ler sidst.........nu er det bekræftet, at man som minimum ikke kommer udenom en stor erstaning til QEC :-)

Op med humøret, Stevieboy :-)

Som jeg ser så er jo kursen opp hittil 3,6% uten noen som helst nyheter så jeg skjønner ikke helt resonnementet ditt Stevepick. Du vet like godt som alle oss andre at denne går fort 10 gangen når en klekkelig erstatning kommer eller evnt de får tillatelse til pilot noe som har endret bilde radikalt siden i går. :)

Kan bli skikkelig moro igjen i QEC framover:

Yzf R1
I dag kl 15:33 129

16. november 2021
Miljø
Utica Resources ønsker å bore en oljebrønn i Gaspé for å bekrefte utnyttelsespotensialet.


https://www.ledevoir.com/societe/environnement/647571/une-petroliere-obtient-gain-de-cause-contre-le-gouvernement-legault

Drill baby DRILL !!!!!

oversat til Engelsk
https://www-ledevoir-com.translate.goog/societe/environnement/647571/une-petroliere-obtient-gain-de-cause-contre-le-gouvernement-legault?_x_tr_sl=fr&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=da&_x_tr_pto=nui

Tror ikke olie får tilladelse men man presser på. Heller tilladelse til den fine QECgas 😊

for Qec sin del så gjelder gassen :-)

Men har de sagt sånn ca når dette f.eks vil bli skrevet i stein?
Jeg vil vite om når dette tullet blir noe av eller ikke?

Tull, hva mener du sigj2?

Forbud er tull

da er vi mer enn enige sigj2, ha en fin helg :-)

Utica Resources' Court Victory Means the Government Must Choose: Develop Quebec's Hydrocarbons or Compensate Companies at Fair Value Français

NEWS PROVIDED BY

Ressources Utica 

Nov 23, 2021, 07:22 ET


https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/utica-resources-court-victory-means-the-government-must-choose-develop-quebec-s-hydrocarbons-or-compensate-companies-at-fair-value-849197314.html


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/utica-resources-court-victory-means-122200926.html

Det var jo hyggelig lesestoff 👍

En virkelig god artikel, som selv SP får svært ved at sluge 😂

det bliver rigtigt godt har før skrevet at jeg tror vi får erstatning på det investerede plus forventet indtjening. så mon ikke vi minimum får 6 kr. i erstatning.