Questerre reported today the recent Quebec polling results
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/polling-data-confirms-majority-quebecers-051500409.html
CALGARY, Alberta, Feb. 02, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Questerre Energy Corporation (“Questerre” or the “Company”) (TSX,OSE:QEC) reported today the recent Quebec polling results on developing natural gas with new technologies.
Over 66% of decided Quebecers support local natural gas development and 20% have no opinion. This support increases to 74% with only 15% against if new technology is used to eliminate emissions, the use of municipal water systems and the use of toxic fluids below ground and 11% have no opinion.
Michael Binnion, President and Chief Executive Officer of Questerre, commented, “Over three years ago, the current Government made it clear to us that their approval for our project depended on demonstrating social acceptability. We have since worked closely with stakeholders to understand their concerns. This polling data and the support of local towns, farmers, trade unions and First Nations shows the progress we have made to achieve this goal.”
The poll was conducted for the Quebec Energy Association by Leger Marketing Inc. in October 2021. It sampled 2,800 Quebecers in all regions of the province. It has an estimated margin of error of 1.9%, 19 times out of 20.
Questerre is an energy technology and innovation company. It is leveraging its expertise gained through early exposure to low permeability reservoirs to acquire significant high-quality resources. We believe we can successfully transition our energy portfolio. With new clean technologies and innovation to responsibly produce and use energy, we can sustain both human progress and our natural environment.
Questerre is a believer that the future success of the oil and gas industry depends on a balance of economics, environment, and society. We are committed to being transparent and are respectful that the public must be part of making the important choices for our energy future.
Advisory Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains certain statements which constitute forward-looking statements or information (“forward-looking statements”) including the Company’s belief that this polling data and the support of local towns, farmers, trade unions and First nations shows the process made to achieving the goal of social acceptability.
Forward-looking statements are based on several material factors, expectations or assumptions of Questerre which have been used to develop such statements and information, but which may prove to be incorrect. Although Questerre believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on them because Questerre can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Further, events or circumstances may cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted as a result of numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, including, without limitation: the effect of COVID-19 on the markets and the demand for oil and natural gas; whether the Company's exploration and development activities respecting its prospects will be successful or that material volumes of petroleum and natural gas reserves will be encountered, or if encountered can be produced on a commercial basis; the ultimate size and scope of any hydrocarbon bearing formations on its lands; that drilling operations on its lands will be successful such that further development activities in these areas are warranted; that Questerre will continue to conduct its operations in a manner consistent with past operations; results from drilling and development activities will be consistent with past operations; the general stability of the economic and political environment in which Questerre operates; drilling results; field production rates and decline rates; the general continuance of current industry conditions; the timing and cost of pipeline, storage and facility construction and expansion and the ability of Questerre to secure adequate product transportation; future commodity prices; currency, exchange and interest rates; regulatory framework regarding royalties, taxes and environmental matters in the jurisdictions in which Questerre operates; and the ability of Questerre to successfully market its oil and natural gas products; changes in commodity prices; changes in the demand for or supply of the Company's products; unanticipated operating results or production declines; changes in tax or environmental laws, changes in development plans of Questerre or by third party operators of Questerre's properties, increased debt levels or debt service requirements; inaccurate estimation of Questerre's oil and gas reserve and resource volumes; limited, unfavourable or a lack of access to capital markets; increased costs; a lack of adequate insurance coverage; the impact of competitors; and certain other risks detailed from time-to-time in Questerre's public disclosure documents. Additional information regarding some of these risks, expectations or assumptions and other factors may be found under in the Company's Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2020, and other documents available on the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as of the date hereof and Questerre undertakes no obligations to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.
CONTACT: For further information, please contact: Questerre Energy Corporation Jason D’Silva, Chief Financial Officer (403) 777-1185 | (403) 777-1578 (FAX) | Email: info@questerre.com
CALGARY, Alberta, Feb. 02, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Questerre Energy Corporation (“Questerre” or the “Company”) (TSX,OSE:QEC) reported today the recent Quebec polling results on developing natural gas with new technologies.
Over 66% of decided Quebecers support local natural gas development and 20% have no opinion. This support increases to 74% with only 15% against if new technology is used to eliminate emissions, the use of municipal water systems and the use of toxic fluids below ground and 11% have no opinion.
Michael Binnion, President and Chief Executive Officer of Questerre, commented, “Over three years ago, the current Government made it clear to us that their approval for our project depended on demonstrating social acceptability. We have since worked closely with stakeholders to understand their concerns. This polling data and the support of local towns, farmers, trade unions and First Nations shows the progress we have made to achieve this goal.”
The poll was conducted for the Quebec Energy Association by Leger Marketing Inc. in October 2021. It sampled 2,800 Quebecers in all regions of the province. It has an estimated margin of error of 1.9%, 19 times out of 20.
Questerre is an energy technology and innovation company. It is leveraging its expertise gained through early exposure to low permeability reservoirs to acquire significant high-quality resources. We believe we can successfully transition our energy portfolio. With new clean technologies and innovation to responsibly produce and use energy, we can sustain both human progress and our natural environment.
Questerre is a believer that the future success of the oil and gas industry depends on a balance of economics, environment, and society. We are committed to being transparent and are respectful that the public must be part of making the important choices for our energy future.
Advisory Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains certain statements which constitute forward-looking statements or information (“forward-looking statements”) including the Company’s belief that this polling data and the support of local towns, farmers, trade unions and First nations shows the process made to achieving the goal of social acceptability.
Forward-looking statements are based on several material factors, expectations or assumptions of Questerre which have been used to develop such statements and information, but which may prove to be incorrect. Although Questerre believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on them because Questerre can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Further, events or circumstances may cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted as a result of numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, including, without limitation: the effect of COVID-19 on the markets and the demand for oil and natural gas; whether the Company's exploration and development activities respecting its prospects will be successful or that material volumes of petroleum and natural gas reserves will be encountered, or if encountered can be produced on a commercial basis; the ultimate size and scope of any hydrocarbon bearing formations on its lands; that drilling operations on its lands will be successful such that further development activities in these areas are warranted; that Questerre will continue to conduct its operations in a manner consistent with past operations; results from drilling and development activities will be consistent with past operations; the general stability of the economic and political environment in which Questerre operates; drilling results; field production rates and decline rates; the general continuance of current industry conditions; the timing and cost of pipeline, storage and facility construction and expansion and the ability of Questerre to secure adequate product transportation; future commodity prices; currency, exchange and interest rates; regulatory framework regarding royalties, taxes and environmental matters in the jurisdictions in which Questerre operates; and the ability of Questerre to successfully market its oil and natural gas products; changes in commodity prices; changes in the demand for or supply of the Company's products; unanticipated operating results or production declines; changes in tax or environmental laws, changes in development plans of Questerre or by third party operators of Questerre's properties, increased debt levels or debt service requirements; inaccurate estimation of Questerre's oil and gas reserve and resource volumes; limited, unfavourable or a lack of access to capital markets; increased costs; a lack of adequate insurance coverage; the impact of competitors; and certain other risks detailed from time-to-time in Questerre's public disclosure documents. Additional information regarding some of these risks, expectations or assumptions and other factors may be found under in the Company's Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2020, and other documents available on the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as of the date hereof and Questerre undertakes no obligations to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.
CONTACT: For further information, please contact: Questerre Energy Corporation Jason D’Silva, Chief Financial Officer (403) 777-1185 | (403) 777-1578 (FAX) | Email: info@questerre.com
VårDitto
03.02.2022 kl 12:19
3212
At du velger å lese/forstå hva jeg skriver i helt feil retning, får stå for din regning, men jeg skal forsøke å si det litt tydeligere:
Jeg sier IKKE at dette er QEC sin egen meningsmåling uten rot i virkeligheten .
Mitt innlegg er definitivt IKKE til forsvar for det XI skriver, men ganske enkelt et spark tilbake med henvisning til alle de mer og mindre edruelige analyser som virkelig er selskapsbestilt, og som går glatt igjennom i finanspressen.
Nå er riktignok XI kritisk til mange av disse, gjerne da i etterpåklokskap, men de er aldri direkte hånlige som i dette tilfellet.
Jeg sier IKKE at dette er QEC sin egen meningsmåling uten rot i virkeligheten .
Mitt innlegg er definitivt IKKE til forsvar for det XI skriver, men ganske enkelt et spark tilbake med henvisning til alle de mer og mindre edruelige analyser som virkelig er selskapsbestilt, og som går glatt igjennom i finanspressen.
Nå er riktignok XI kritisk til mange av disse, gjerne da i etterpåklokskap, men de er aldri direkte hånlige som i dette tilfellet.
Vestjyden
03.02.2022 kl 12:29
3134
Som jeg skrev i morges, er det en artikel, der ligger til grund for al virakken.
Men så bliver alle tyndskidene ristet ud og godt for det.
Mange tager et tab i dag og synd for dem.
Men så bliver alle tyndskidene ristet ud og godt for det.
Mange tager et tab i dag og synd for dem.
Ja, fint at få rystet træet med folk som "dentyndeidiot" osv, som laver i bukserne, selvom casen ikke har ændret sig det mindste fra igår :-)
Redigert 03.02.2022 kl 12:43
Du må logge inn for å svare
tuja
03.02.2022 kl 12:44
3023
Enig. Super dag for å kjøpe rimeligere aksjer. QEC har produksjon og verdier som SP1M verdivurderer til 1,7kr. I tillegg kommer eventuell kompensasjon for de lisenser som ikke ligger på områdene til First Nations. Men på deres land er nå sannsynligheten meget stor for at de får gå i gang med pilot. Dersom ikke, må myndighetene skrive om lovverket. Men da får de urinnvånerne på nakken. Tror nok de folkevalgte må trå varsomt fram.
Det hjelper lite hva SB1 sier, de vet ikke eller bestemmer hva som skal skje med Qec. Québec vil selvfølgelig betale minst mulig og gjør nok det de kan for at det skal skje, kanskje de jobber med ny lov som gjør at de slipper å betale ėn eneste krone...ingenting er skrevet i stein selv om Hausera påstår noe annet.
6710, her har du mange gode poeng som svært få har tenkt på, så det er viktig å ikke trykke for fort på salgsknappen!
VårDitto
03.02.2022 kl 12:55
2913
Jeg tror du må akseptere å bli oppfattet som det du ser ut for via ditt nick; at du "skjuler" kjønnet ditt bak dette er ikke min skyld!
Men siden du ikke kan skylde din hårsårhet og hissige gemytt på PMS, da må det være andre årsaker.
Min opprinnelige kommentar om at noen av dere brukte forumet til å krangle om danske (i all hovedsak) politikeres elendighet, og som ikke hadde noe med trådens mening (diskutere QEC), det synes jeg du bør tåle.
Min innstilling til QEC er positiv (jeg har nok aksjer), og jeg har blant annet tidligere beskrevet hvordan jeg tror at en kompensasjon kan tenkes å bli beregnet i en eventuell rettsak, da basert på hvordan kontrakter i oljeutbygginger vanligvis er formulert., ref mitt innlegg i trådenQEC analyse 100-400% den 20.01 kl 12:29.
Den betraktningen ble meget aktualisert i dag.
Men siden du ikke kan skylde din hårsårhet og hissige gemytt på PMS, da må det være andre årsaker.
Min opprinnelige kommentar om at noen av dere brukte forumet til å krangle om danske (i all hovedsak) politikeres elendighet, og som ikke hadde noe med trådens mening (diskutere QEC), det synes jeg du bør tåle.
Min innstilling til QEC er positiv (jeg har nok aksjer), og jeg har blant annet tidligere beskrevet hvordan jeg tror at en kompensasjon kan tenkes å bli beregnet i en eventuell rettsak, da basert på hvordan kontrakter i oljeutbygginger vanligvis er formulert., ref mitt innlegg i trådenQEC analyse 100-400% den 20.01 kl 12:29.
Den betraktningen ble meget aktualisert i dag.
Jeg er da fløjtende ligeglad, hvordan folk som dig opfatter mig, men mit nick er en forkortelse af noget, som du ikke forstår, men fred være med det :-)
Desuden bruger jeg dette forum til lige nøjagtig det, som jeg ønsker og det kommer du ikke til at ændre på, uanset om du kan "tåle" det eller ej :-) hmmmmm
Desuden bruger jeg dette forum til lige nøjagtig det, som jeg ønsker og det kommer du ikke til at ændre på, uanset om du kan "tåle" det eller ej :-) hmmmmm
Redigert 03.02.2022 kl 13:01
Du må logge inn for å svare
Det er da fortsatt bra interesse for Qec, det er omsatt snart for 26mill så å male faen på veggen er det vel ingen grunn til!
Jeren
03.02.2022 kl 14:02
2606
Here are some facts and sources to have a reasoned conversation about oil and gas development in Quebec:
• The Quebec Energy Association will be presenting a study to the Quebec government that importing 100% of natural gas will create 3x more emissions than producing it in Quebec with carbon tech.
https://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/politique/2022-02-02/projet-de-loi-sur-la-fin-des-hydrocarbures/au-moins-500-millions-demandes-par-l-industrie.php
• In recent polling done for the Quebec Energy Association, they found that over 66% of decided Quebecois support local natural gas development, and 20% have no opinion. This support increases to 74% if new technology is used to eliminate emissions, the use of municipal water systems, and the use of toxic fluids below ground.
https://boereport.com/2022/02/02/questerre-polling-data-confirms-majority-of-quebecers-support-zero-emissions-gas-projects/
• The bill violates the rights of Indigenous communities to pursue development opportunities on their traditional territories such as the Abenakis of Wolinak in Bécancour who have just signed a joint economic development agreement with Questerre Energy to develop a zero-emissions natural gas project.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-quebec-indigenous-groups-join-questerre-energy-in-push-for-natural-gas/
• According to the Montreal Economic Institute, the development of natural gas alone could create 9,200 jobs, increase GDP by $93 Billion and generate $15 billion in tax revenues river 25 years in Quebec.
https://www.iedm.org/fr/exploitation-du-gaz-et-du-petrole-une-erreur-historique-dequebec/
• Outright banning industry and expropriating development permits risk Quebec's and Canada's reputation as a place that is safe to invest in. The province is already facing NAFTA challenges from foreign investors and recently lost a court challenge that ruled Quebec either had to allow development or must compensate oil and gas companies.
https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topicsdomaines/disp-diff/lone.aspx?lang=eng
https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/utica-resources-court-victory-means-the-government-must-choose-develop-quebec-s-hydrocarbons-or-compensate-companies-at-fair-value-849197314.html
Stories that get it right
Questerre polling data confirms majority of Quebecers support developing natural gas with new technologies
Questerre Energy, a major holder of oil and gas permits in Quebec just released polling that shows the majority of Quebecois are in favor of natural gas development using Carbon Tech. This is a big leap forward in the social acceptability of oil and gas development projects in the province. This polling comes as the Government of Quebec tables its bill to ban exploration and development of oil and gas. Seemingly, it also goes against the will of the Quebecois and also Indigenous communities who seek to develop hydrocarbons.
• The Quebec Energy Association will be presenting a study to the Quebec government that importing 100% of natural gas will create 3x more emissions than producing it in Quebec with carbon tech.
https://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/politique/2022-02-02/projet-de-loi-sur-la-fin-des-hydrocarbures/au-moins-500-millions-demandes-par-l-industrie.php
• In recent polling done for the Quebec Energy Association, they found that over 66% of decided Quebecois support local natural gas development, and 20% have no opinion. This support increases to 74% if new technology is used to eliminate emissions, the use of municipal water systems, and the use of toxic fluids below ground.
https://boereport.com/2022/02/02/questerre-polling-data-confirms-majority-of-quebecers-support-zero-emissions-gas-projects/
• The bill violates the rights of Indigenous communities to pursue development opportunities on their traditional territories such as the Abenakis of Wolinak in Bécancour who have just signed a joint economic development agreement with Questerre Energy to develop a zero-emissions natural gas project.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-quebec-indigenous-groups-join-questerre-energy-in-push-for-natural-gas/
• According to the Montreal Economic Institute, the development of natural gas alone could create 9,200 jobs, increase GDP by $93 Billion and generate $15 billion in tax revenues river 25 years in Quebec.
https://www.iedm.org/fr/exploitation-du-gaz-et-du-petrole-une-erreur-historique-dequebec/
• Outright banning industry and expropriating development permits risk Quebec's and Canada's reputation as a place that is safe to invest in. The province is already facing NAFTA challenges from foreign investors and recently lost a court challenge that ruled Quebec either had to allow development or must compensate oil and gas companies.
https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topicsdomaines/disp-diff/lone.aspx?lang=eng
https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/utica-resources-court-victory-means-the-government-must-choose-develop-quebec-s-hydrocarbons-or-compensate-companies-at-fair-value-849197314.html
Stories that get it right
Questerre polling data confirms majority of Quebecers support developing natural gas with new technologies
Questerre Energy, a major holder of oil and gas permits in Quebec just released polling that shows the majority of Quebecois are in favor of natural gas development using Carbon Tech. This is a big leap forward in the social acceptability of oil and gas development projects in the province. This polling comes as the Government of Quebec tables its bill to ban exploration and development of oil and gas. Seemingly, it also goes against the will of the Quebecois and also Indigenous communities who seek to develop hydrocarbons.
For det første SomSa så er jeg hellig overbevist om at Qec var forberedt på myndighetene sin taktikk når det gjelder summen som de har slengt ut. Vær klar over at Qec har kjempet i mange år med myndighetene i Quebec og er det noen som kjenner til strategien deres så er det nok Binnion. Det scenarioet her var de meget sikkert klar over og derfor gjorde/klarte Binnion og få avtalen i boks med First Nation før dette ble annonsert. Du glemmer en ting og det er at Qec har en advokat i sitt styre som har international handelsrett som ett av sin fagområder og ikke minst er partner i Quebec baserte firmaet BCF Business Law med over 500 ansatte og 300 fagfolk, Mrs Mirrielle Fontain. Jeg mener Qec er såpass godt skodd juridisk i denne saken og at med det siste trekket til Binnion med avtalen med First Nation så er nok det mye av grunnen til at Jason gikk såpass høyt ut med 18x han hadde aldri turt å gå ut sånn uten at de var juridisk sikre på hva de sitter på av forhandlingskort, så folkens det er ingen grunn til panikk, her har Binnion satt myndighetene sjakk matt, dette går veien med mest sannsynlig pilot eller en klekkelig erstatning!!! :-)))
risksøker
03.02.2022 kl 14:33
2414
Har du sett noe skriftlig fra regjeringen i Quebec i form av lovforslag. Har ikke sett noe eller er det bare et løst utspill. Har du sett noen reaksjoner fra industrien?
tuja
03.02.2022 kl 14:39
2367
Helt enig. Dette er bare ett utspill. QEC har meget gode kort på hånd etter avtalen med First Nations. Uten tvil.
VårDitto
03.02.2022 kl 15:08
2241
XI har spedd på sin harselering av QEC og utsiktene for kompensasjon i dag, hvor de i sammenfattet setter selskapets tidligere antydninger om "worst case" i relasjon til myndighetenes forslag, og derved konkluderer med at QEC sin utregning er langt ute i det blå.
XI slenger riktignok på at dette er et forslag og at bransjen protesterer kraftig, men lar det skinne igjennom at de (XI) fremdeles hånflirer av QEC .
Lite sier de om hvor realistisk myndighetenes forslag er, f eks sett i relasjon til å skulle være en fair kompensasjon, men derimot kan man få oppfatningen at de er "på myndighetenes side".
Litt balansert vurdering etterlyses fra XI; har QEC framstilt dette litt vel rosenrødt, eller fremstår myndighetenes forslag som kommet fra en "bananrepublikk?
Men den etterlysningen får jeg vel rette til XI.
XI slenger riktignok på at dette er et forslag og at bransjen protesterer kraftig, men lar det skinne igjennom at de (XI) fremdeles hånflirer av QEC .
Lite sier de om hvor realistisk myndighetenes forslag er, f eks sett i relasjon til å skulle være en fair kompensasjon, men derimot kan man få oppfatningen at de er "på myndighetenes side".
Litt balansert vurdering etterlyses fra XI; har QEC framstilt dette litt vel rosenrødt, eller fremstår myndighetenes forslag som kommet fra en "bananrepublikk?
Men den etterlysningen får jeg vel rette til XI.
tuja
03.02.2022 kl 15:15
2208
Såg det samme. Fortsatt lavmål. Og ikke ett ord om avtalen med urinnvånerne. Den kom på plass etter Jason`s svar på mail, der 18-20 gangen var nevnt. I mitt hode er faktisk den avtalen en gamehanger.
Hehe, Lars Brandeggen var inne i QEC på 1 krone på grunn av muligheten for rally på kompensasjon, og han har nok solgt seg ut rundt 2,5-3 kroner. Det viser vel hva slags folk det er snakk om som styrer skuta der inne... Snakk om besserwisser!
tynnidioten
07.02.2022 kl 22:32
1379
Du fikk også rett i at 2.30-2.35 om ikke lenge ..........
Jeg har købt flere aktier i dag, Enten får QEC en stor erstaning eller så bliver der pilot/udvinding (win win) - Vi vil om ikke ret længe grine af en kurs på 2,30-2,35 NOK.
Jeg har købt flere aktier i dag, Enten får QEC en stor erstaning eller så bliver der pilot/udvinding (win win) - Vi vil om ikke ret længe grine af en kurs på 2,30-2,35 NOK.
Redigert 07.02.2022 kl 22:33
Du må logge inn for å svare