QEC- October 2023 hearing discussion thread
PLEASE notis, that this is an old article from january 2022
The hearing will now in October and one can only speculate what the outcome will be!
We know that the natives are interested in QEC getting permission to test its net zero and to extract oil and gas
QEC has a strong case regarding their compensation
What do you think about it all????
Quebec Indigenous groups join Questerre Energy in push for natural gas development
NICOLAS VAN PRAET
PUBLISHED JANUARY 27, 2022
"Questerre Energy Corp. QEC-T -2.44%decrease
has gained additional First Nations support for its push to develop what it calls a “zero-emissions” natural gas hub in Quebec"
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-quebec-indigenous-groups-join-questerre-energy-in-push-for-natural-gas/
https://nationtalk.ca/story/quebec-indigenous-groups-join-questerre-energy-in-push-for-natural-gas-development-the-globe-and-mail
The hearing will now in October and one can only speculate what the outcome will be!
We know that the natives are interested in QEC getting permission to test its net zero and to extract oil and gas
QEC has a strong case regarding their compensation
What do you think about it all????
Quebec Indigenous groups join Questerre Energy in push for natural gas development
NICOLAS VAN PRAET
PUBLISHED JANUARY 27, 2022
"Questerre Energy Corp. QEC-T -2.44%decrease
has gained additional First Nations support for its push to develop what it calls a “zero-emissions” natural gas hub in Quebec"
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-quebec-indigenous-groups-join-questerre-energy-in-push-for-natural-gas/
https://nationtalk.ca/story/quebec-indigenous-groups-join-questerre-energy-in-push-for-natural-gas-development-the-globe-and-mail
Redigert 05.10.2023 kl 15:36
Du må logge inn for å svare
MC Axel
05.10.2023 kl 15:51
65281
As it stands, Quebec is dependent on getting energy from outside. This means that Legault is gambling with Quebec's energy security
Think he's going to cost Quebecers dearly
September 25, 2023,
"Legault welcomed his counterparts to the conference Monday, he suggested that a deal with Newfoundland and Labrador is crucial for Quebec.
"Obviously, to reach our carbon neutrality goals, we have to build more renewable energy," the Quebec premier said."
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/show-us-money-n-l-155938388.html
And here:
https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/varcoe-oil-85-companies-new-deals-spending-plans
Think he's going to cost Quebecers dearly
September 25, 2023,
"Legault welcomed his counterparts to the conference Monday, he suggested that a deal with Newfoundland and Labrador is crucial for Quebec.
"Obviously, to reach our carbon neutrality goals, we have to build more renewable energy," the Quebec premier said."
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/show-us-money-n-l-155938388.html
And here:
https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/varcoe-oil-85-companies-new-deals-spending-plans
Redigert 06.11.2023 kl 16:20
Du må logge inn for å svare
googleearth11
06.10.2023 kl 09:43
64992
Not a signal of changing Quebecs energy politics. Quite opposite. Quebec will never legalize gasproduction in Lowlands.
MC Axel
13.10.2023 kl 21:54
64441
This could be something and it's absolutely not bad for QEC and others
From today
Taxpayer Win! Supreme Court Ruling Against Trudeau’s Anti-Pipeline Legislation a Huge Win for Taxpayers - Energy News for the Canadian Oil & Gas Industry
“The Supreme Court’s decision is a huge win for Canadian taxpayers and resource workers,” said Franco Terrazzano, CTF Federal Director.
“This means the feds can’t use this law to stop premiers like Scott Moe or Danielle Smith or François Legault from developing resources to create jobs for people in their provinces.”
Read it all here:
https://energynow.ca/2023/10/supreme-court-ruling-against-anti-pipeline-legislation-a-huge-win-for-taxpayers/?amp
From today
Taxpayer Win! Supreme Court Ruling Against Trudeau’s Anti-Pipeline Legislation a Huge Win for Taxpayers - Energy News for the Canadian Oil & Gas Industry
“The Supreme Court’s decision is a huge win for Canadian taxpayers and resource workers,” said Franco Terrazzano, CTF Federal Director.
“This means the feds can’t use this law to stop premiers like Scott Moe or Danielle Smith or François Legault from developing resources to create jobs for people in their provinces.”
Read it all here:
https://energynow.ca/2023/10/supreme-court-ruling-against-anti-pipeline-legislation-a-huge-win-for-taxpayers/?amp
MC Axel
13.10.2023 kl 23:47
64014
Good to know what Jason/QEC thinks about this
https://www.westerninvestor.com/alberta/construction-association-thrilled-impact-assessment-act-ruled-unconstitutional-7680572
Business groups applaud Supreme Court ruling against federal environmental impact law
Author of the article:
CP, The Canadian Press
Amanda Stephenson
Published Oct 13, 202
https://www.google.com/amp/s/calgaryherald.com/business/business-groups-applaud-supreme-court-ruling-against-federal-environmental-impact-law/wcm/839f06d7-c904-4f33-9ccc-75cd1333fcef/amp/
https://www.westerninvestor.com/alberta/construction-association-thrilled-impact-assessment-act-ruled-unconstitutional-7680572
Business groups applaud Supreme Court ruling against federal environmental impact law
Author of the article:
CP, The Canadian Press
Amanda Stephenson
Published Oct 13, 202
https://www.google.com/amp/s/calgaryherald.com/business/business-groups-applaud-supreme-court-ruling-against-federal-environmental-impact-law/wcm/839f06d7-c904-4f33-9ccc-75cd1333fcef/amp/
Redigert 13.10.2023 kl 23:50
Du må logge inn for å svare
minsin
14.10.2023 kl 09:41
63745
1013
14.10.2023 kl 09:56
63689
Hvad siger du til dommen? Kan vi drage paralleller til Qec og den sag de kører.
MC Axel
14.10.2023 kl 10:42
63600
👍
Now there is at least one less opponent to contend with regarding the extraction of oil and gas and LNG export and that is Justin Trudeau & Co.
Now there is at least one less opponent to contend with regarding the extraction of oil and gas and LNG export and that is Justin Trudeau & Co.
Redigert 14.10.2023 kl 10:50
Du må logge inn for å svare
Fjellbris
14.10.2023 kl 10:48
63560
googleearth11 skrev Why didn`t QEC react at TSX? Still 0,21 there...
Markedet må få fordøye info, så er det jo også Oslo børs som ledere ann kursutvikling i QEC, så svaret her får vi til uka😀
MC Axel
14.10.2023 kl 10:48
63531
Yes, it clearly shows that it is not impossible to win a case against the state and = against the provinces (Quebec as well)
We have legislation on this and it was Quebec that encouraged the oil companies to explore and issued licenses = a strong case
We have legislation on this and it was Quebec that encouraged the oil companies to explore and issued licenses = a strong case
Redigert 14.10.2023 kl 10:51
Du må logge inn for å svare
bluesky2023
14.10.2023 kl 11:31
63419
Meget gode nyheter for QEC-caset!
https://www.northernontariobusiness.com/industry-news/green/supreme-court-rules-federal-impact-assessment-act-partly-unconstitutional-7680914
https://www.northernontariobusiness.com/industry-news/green/supreme-court-rules-federal-impact-assessment-act-partly-unconstitutional-7680914
Redigert 14.10.2023 kl 11:33
Du må logge inn for å svare
hgsd33
14.10.2023 kl 17:10
63044
Slettet brukerskrev Galskapens tråd
Eskalering av krigen i Midtøsten kan jo skje, da kan det hende Iran stenger Hormuz og vi mister noen eksport tønner fra PG, sånn ca. 17% av verdens olje passerer her.
På en annen side kan det bli litt krise i Europa som gjør seg avhengig av Qatar gass som også passerer Hormuz. Så får vi får se hva som skjer., kanskje dette gir et ekstra trykk på Québec som har mye kortreist gass liggende.
Så har vi denne fra i går som kan ha positiv innvirkning på vår høring om en ukes tid.
«The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) and Independent Contractors and Businesses Association (ICBA) are applauding a Supreme Court of Canada ruling this morning, October 13, that found the Impact Assessment Act to be unconstitutional.»
På en annen side kan det bli litt krise i Europa som gjør seg avhengig av Qatar gass som også passerer Hormuz. Så får vi får se hva som skjer., kanskje dette gir et ekstra trykk på Québec som har mye kortreist gass liggende.
Så har vi denne fra i går som kan ha positiv innvirkning på vår høring om en ukes tid.
«The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) and Independent Contractors and Businesses Association (ICBA) are applauding a Supreme Court of Canada ruling this morning, October 13, that found the Impact Assessment Act to be unconstitutional.»
MC Axel
14.10.2023 kl 17:11
63023
Posted: Oct 14, 2023
Court's ruling on environmental impact law clips federal government's wings on climate change, expert says
The decision clearly states the environment is an important issue, but the federal government can't overstep its boundaries into provincial jurisdiction, such as power plants and natural resource projects.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/bakx-scoc-ruling-1.6995962?cmp=rss
Jensi
14.10.2023 kl 18:04
62892
Enig
👍
Tydeligt signal . Men vi kender jo quebecs politikere....... Håber de kommer til at sluge en kamel.
👍
Tydeligt signal . Men vi kender jo quebecs politikere....... Håber de kommer til at sluge en kamel.
Redigert 14.10.2023 kl 18:05
Du må logge inn for å svare
Yzf R1
15.10.2023 kl 09:35
62414
googleearth11
15.10.2023 kl 13:14
62130
Ja, klar over at det er Oslo som styrer. Men hadde dette vært noe virkelig hot, så ville markedet handla med begge hender der der er åpent. Det skjedde i 2008, da kursen i QEC var mye høyere på det maksimale, enn det som var tilfellet i Oslo. Mener den var på 35 på maks i Toronto, før den falt tilbake, og under Oslo - som på sin side aldri gikk så høyt. Men selvsagt hører det til de ekstreme unntakene. Det var vel forresten et tilfelle for et par måneder siden at TSX var oppe i 0,31, mens den lå på 0,23 i Oslo. Falt tilbake igjen.
kiza42
15.10.2023 kl 22:46
61620
Fjellbris
15.10.2023 kl 23:07
61520
Svaret får vi i morgen, ha en fin QEC uke, jeg tror på videre oppgang😀
1013
16.10.2023 kl 09:34
60930
Mon ikke høringen Torsdag og fredag kommer frem til samme resultat som dommen i sidste uge i lowlands. Det tror jeg. 💰💰💰💵💵💵
smoke
16.10.2023 kl 09:34
60902
Greit foreløpig.. under times handel.. under 500k skuile til å sende den opp i 1.67 :)
MC Axel
16.10.2023 kl 11:37
60657
👍
I am sure that this ruling was incredibly positive for QEC. Now they don't have to think about the Canadian state, but only about the Quebec government/authorities regarding their licenses.
It also clearly shows that it is not impossible for QEC to win a case against Quebec. QEC has a good and strong case
"The Supreme Court has effectively acknowledged the division of powers stipulated in the Canadian Constitution and reinforced the jurisdiction of the provinces to manage the development of natural resources, forestry, and electrical energy.
What proponents seeking to invest in such projects in Canada had faced with this Act is navigating two project reviews – one led by the federal government, and one co-ordinated by the provincial government – that were often redundant and at cross purposes."
https://energynow.ca/2023/10/opinion-supreme-court-gets-it-right-on-the-federal-impact-assessment-act/?amp
I am sure that this ruling was incredibly positive for QEC. Now they don't have to think about the Canadian state, but only about the Quebec government/authorities regarding their licenses.
It also clearly shows that it is not impossible for QEC to win a case against Quebec. QEC has a good and strong case
"The Supreme Court has effectively acknowledged the division of powers stipulated in the Canadian Constitution and reinforced the jurisdiction of the provinces to manage the development of natural resources, forestry, and electrical energy.
What proponents seeking to invest in such projects in Canada had faced with this Act is navigating two project reviews – one led by the federal government, and one co-ordinated by the provincial government – that were often redundant and at cross purposes."
https://energynow.ca/2023/10/opinion-supreme-court-gets-it-right-on-the-federal-impact-assessment-act/?amp
tuja
16.10.2023 kl 11:43
60613
Fin den, Mc Axel. Tror nok Quebec fikk mere å tenke på etter dommen fra høgsterett. Blir vanskelig å vri seg unna enten forandring av bill26, og tillate miljømessig utvinning av naturgass, eller betale ut svimlende summer i erstatning.
tuja
16.10.2023 kl 12:39
60432
Forundrer meg at noen i det hele tatt vurderer å selge på lave 1,6 tallet, med olja over 90 usd, og dommen fra høgsterett som kom rett før helga. Blir enda vanskeligere for Quebec å sno seg unna utvinning eller erstatning.
hgsd33
16.10.2023 kl 19:24
60132
Her er det enda mer og tenke på.
«Berlin wants Qatari gas. But Qatar is a seen as a sponsor of Hamas, which carried out an attack on Israel.»
https://www.politico.eu/article/german-gas-deal-qatar-renewed-scrutiny-emir-tamim-bin-hamad-al-thani-olaf-scholz/
«Nationalized by the German government in the fall of 2022, the gas company SEFE (formerly Gazprom Germania) plans to start using Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) once again for the first time since the beginning of last year’s energy crisis. This contradicts the federal government’s goal of reducing dependence on Russian supplies, according to Bloomberg.»
https://tvpworld.com/72929632/german-stateowned-company-resumes-trading-in-russian-lng
«Berlin wants Qatari gas. But Qatar is a seen as a sponsor of Hamas, which carried out an attack on Israel.»
https://www.politico.eu/article/german-gas-deal-qatar-renewed-scrutiny-emir-tamim-bin-hamad-al-thani-olaf-scholz/
«Nationalized by the German government in the fall of 2022, the gas company SEFE (formerly Gazprom Germania) plans to start using Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) once again for the first time since the beginning of last year’s energy crisis. This contradicts the federal government’s goal of reducing dependence on Russian supplies, according to Bloomberg.»
https://tvpworld.com/72929632/german-stateowned-company-resumes-trading-in-russian-lng
smoke
17.10.2023 kl 14:00
59510
Og nå skal Tyskerne holde varmen med godt gammelt kull.. Gratulerer miljøvennlige Quebecere :D
Peter Sellers
17.10.2023 kl 14:25
59424
@smoke, det her går jo så det suser, du nevnte at det skulle bli moro denne uken men hittil i dag så er vi under 1,60 og ned....en annen ventet på Rally denne uken og noen mente at vi skulle mye opp! Det ser ut til at det ikke er store forventninger til høringen når man ser på oms/interesse for aksjen så her blir det som vanlig satt på VENT!!
googleearth11
17.10.2023 kl 15:01
59311
Nettopp dette jeg har sagt. Det er KONSEKVENSENE av høringen som er interessant. Dernest framlegging av q3 den 9.november. Man trenger ikke være rakettforsker for å se at handelen er robotstyrt.
Jensi
17.10.2023 kl 17:46
59012
Ja
Det gør de allierede
Det gør de allierede
Redigert 17.10.2023 kl 17:46
Du må logge inn for å svare
Nitrist. Like nitrist som det har vært i snart 20 år. Kommer den noensinne opp på 1.80 mon tro? Jeg tviler.
smoke
17.10.2023 kl 18:42
58850
Fortere enn du aner.. se på hvor lite som skal til for å sende aksjen opp kontra ned.. Med det nyhetsbilde vi har nå.. eneste håpet å få denne ned i 1.4 er 3 verdenskrig, litt sykt å sitte håpe på det.. QEC er ca. dobbelt så mye verdt nå som sist dere prøvde :)
tynnidioten
17.10.2023 kl 19:05
58775
Du skrev;
«under 500k skuile til å sende den opp i 1.67 :)»
I dag skulle det bare noen ti-talls tusen aksjer til for å sende den under 1.60.
Er det ikke da motsatt av hva du skriver ?
«under 500k skuile til å sende den opp i 1.67 :)»
I dag skulle det bare noen ti-talls tusen aksjer til for å sende den under 1.60.
Er det ikke da motsatt av hva du skriver ?
Redigert 17.10.2023 kl 19:05
Du må logge inn for å svare
googleearth11
17.10.2023 kl 19:33
58670
Tenker han mener 500.000 i reelle kjøp. Ikke robotstyrte handler opp og ned som vi har sett lenge nå.