EAM - A stock that could be the winner of the year! (16,34 NOK)
The EAM case became significantly stronger after the Supreme Court took up the case
I think they are in settlement negotiations at the moment, hence all the silence!
If not, time flies and before we know it, we will be approaching June 17th and last time the stock went up high against expectations.
The previous verdict was a gross error of judgment. I am sure EAM will win this time
https://www.nordnet.dk/markedet/nyheder/f86acb2a-fd35-4323-84d6-b68b57ec78a5
https://www.nordnet.dk/markedet/nyheder/7b5521d8-5fbd-4e55-80ae-05e939589e48
-----
One of the arguments from EAM Solar is that the court did not take into account the forged documents that were used to defraud EAM Solar. These same documents were used to defraud the Italian state and there they were used as evidence and ended with a verdict in favor of the Italian state
If the case is dismissed, EAM Solar will be exposed to great injustice.
forged documents = fraud!
-----
This has changed from being a high risk case to a medium risk case, it changed when the Superior court took up the EAM case again. T
his will be a Zenith on seroids!
Det er en åpenbar logisk feil
«Basert på en juridisk vurdering av dommen fra ankedomstolen i Milano 4. juli, samt mottak av begrunnelsen for dommen den 7. august 2024, som beskrevet i rapporten for andre kvartal 2024, har styret i EAM Solar besluttet å anke til Italiensk høyesterett,» heter det i børsmeldingen.
Styret mener retten har unnlatt å ta stilling til de faktiske bevisene som ble lagt frem i rettssaken i 2019, hvor det ble bevist at EAM mottok falsifiserte dokumenter under kontraktsforhandlingene med Aveleos. Disse dokumentene er de samme som ankedomstolen la til grunn for å dømme for svindel mot den italienske staten.
– For det første er de dømt for svindel mot den italienske staten på grunn av de forfalskede dokumentene. De samme dokumentene ble brukt til å bedra oss. Det er en åpenbar logisk feil her, sier Jakobsen og legger til:
https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2024/10/10/8190474/eam-solar-anker-beslutning
------
If EAM Solar is successful in continuing its case, these small sums could turn into big money
The odds are 90/10 in EAM favour
Of course, you shouldn't bet all your money on this one, but it could be the big bet of the year
Read this:
https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2024/10/10/8190474/eam-solar-anker-beslutning
------
Lotto coupon no. 1 on Oslo Stock Exchange or more like a golden ticket
Full compensation will give approximately 16,34 NOK per share
For those who want to know more about the appeal case and the EAM claim of 2.5 billion NOK
Then read this:
https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2024/10/10/8190474/eam-solar-anker-beslutning
------
COPY FROM HP71:
HP17
I går kl 14:37 241
Det er ikke lenge igjen til EAM får svaret på om anke komme innen 14 dager
11. oktober 2024 leverte EAM inn ny anke til Høyesterett og ba retten om igjen å oppheve dommen fra lagmannsretten. Begrunnelsen for denne anken kan leses i tidligere børsmeldinger.Det er ennå ikke tatt noen avgjørelser av Høyesterett med hensyn til tidslinjer eller høringsdatoer.
https://newsweb.oslobors.no/message/634995
I ventetiden er det verdt å trekke frem denne tråden og åpningsinnlegget fra TS. Les det nøye
Se vedlagt analyse av EAM fra a til å: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rjLMRZF1zvR_M-IzGdmY1ihokPxbLrLK/view?usp=sharing
Gjennomgang av skriv fra høyesterett med markeringer på de mest essensielle punkter: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MSyoarVGtAvcWRrCVZBgwmNzhfJQKt_h/view?usp=sharing
----------
I think they are in settlement negotiations at the moment, hence all the silence!
If not, time flies and before we know it, we will be approaching June 17th and last time the stock went up high against expectations.
The previous verdict was a gross error of judgment. I am sure EAM will win this time
https://www.nordnet.dk/markedet/nyheder/f86acb2a-fd35-4323-84d6-b68b57ec78a5
https://www.nordnet.dk/markedet/nyheder/7b5521d8-5fbd-4e55-80ae-05e939589e48
-----
One of the arguments from EAM Solar is that the court did not take into account the forged documents that were used to defraud EAM Solar. These same documents were used to defraud the Italian state and there they were used as evidence and ended with a verdict in favor of the Italian state
If the case is dismissed, EAM Solar will be exposed to great injustice.
forged documents = fraud!
-----
This has changed from being a high risk case to a medium risk case, it changed when the Superior court took up the EAM case again. T
his will be a Zenith on seroids!
Det er en åpenbar logisk feil
«Basert på en juridisk vurdering av dommen fra ankedomstolen i Milano 4. juli, samt mottak av begrunnelsen for dommen den 7. august 2024, som beskrevet i rapporten for andre kvartal 2024, har styret i EAM Solar besluttet å anke til Italiensk høyesterett,» heter det i børsmeldingen.
Styret mener retten har unnlatt å ta stilling til de faktiske bevisene som ble lagt frem i rettssaken i 2019, hvor det ble bevist at EAM mottok falsifiserte dokumenter under kontraktsforhandlingene med Aveleos. Disse dokumentene er de samme som ankedomstolen la til grunn for å dømme for svindel mot den italienske staten.
– For det første er de dømt for svindel mot den italienske staten på grunn av de forfalskede dokumentene. De samme dokumentene ble brukt til å bedra oss. Det er en åpenbar logisk feil her, sier Jakobsen og legger til:
https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2024/10/10/8190474/eam-solar-anker-beslutning
------
If EAM Solar is successful in continuing its case, these small sums could turn into big money
The odds are 90/10 in EAM favour
Of course, you shouldn't bet all your money on this one, but it could be the big bet of the year
Read this:
https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2024/10/10/8190474/eam-solar-anker-beslutning
------
Lotto coupon no. 1 on Oslo Stock Exchange or more like a golden ticket
Full compensation will give approximately 16,34 NOK per share
For those who want to know more about the appeal case and the EAM claim of 2.5 billion NOK
Then read this:
https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2024/10/10/8190474/eam-solar-anker-beslutning
------
COPY FROM HP71:
HP17
I går kl 14:37 241
Det er ikke lenge igjen til EAM får svaret på om anke komme innen 14 dager
11. oktober 2024 leverte EAM inn ny anke til Høyesterett og ba retten om igjen å oppheve dommen fra lagmannsretten. Begrunnelsen for denne anken kan leses i tidligere børsmeldinger.Det er ennå ikke tatt noen avgjørelser av Høyesterett med hensyn til tidslinjer eller høringsdatoer.
https://newsweb.oslobors.no/message/634995
I ventetiden er det verdt å trekke frem denne tråden og åpningsinnlegget fra TS. Les det nøye
Se vedlagt analyse av EAM fra a til å: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rjLMRZF1zvR_M-IzGdmY1ihokPxbLrLK/view?usp=sharing
Gjennomgang av skriv fra høyesterett med markeringer på de mest essensielle punkter: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MSyoarVGtAvcWRrCVZBgwmNzhfJQKt_h/view?usp=sharing
----------
Redigert 26.03.2025 kl 12:34
Du må logge inn for å svare
MC Axel
07.02.2025 kl 14:39
4728
I agree with that or I would not have invested in this share. As I have said so many times before, if EAM is successful in its claims and the court includes the forged documents in the EAM case, then we are easily talking about hundreds of percentages and a share that must be settled in full NOK.
It is always a risk in a share. I believe that the court has made a serious mistake regarding EAM, especially since the same forged documents were crucial and helped the Italian state to win its case
It is always a risk in a share. I believe that the court has made a serious mistake regarding EAM, especially since the same forged documents were crucial and helped the Italian state to win its case
Tony83
07.02.2025 kl 15:45
4670
You probably mean not UBI Banca but Aveleos case, correct? so what is the timetable --> today or on Monday we'll get RNS that EAM has appealed the UBI Banca decision, agree? What about Aveleos --> the appeal was filed on 24th October 24, so when will we get to know whether the Supreme Court has taken in into the proceedings, what do you think?
HMPInvest
07.02.2025 kl 17:23
4626
Copied from the Supreme Court in Rome: Link https://www.cortedicassazione.it/en/le_funzioni_della_corte.page
On the first and fourth line "may be lodged . . . contradiction". There is clearly a contradiction by the under court. So, yes, interesting.
"The appeal in cassation
The appeal in cassation may be lodged against the measures issued by the ordinary courts at the appellate level or in degree only: the reasons given to support the use may be, in civil matters, the violation of the right material (errores in iudicando) or procedural (errores in proceeding), the vices of motivation (lack, insufficiency or contradiction) of the judgment under appeal; or, again, the grounds for jurisdiction. A similar scheme is expected to appeal to the Supreme Court in criminal matters."
On the first and fourth line "may be lodged . . . contradiction". There is clearly a contradiction by the under court. So, yes, interesting.
"The appeal in cassation
The appeal in cassation may be lodged against the measures issued by the ordinary courts at the appellate level or in degree only: the reasons given to support the use may be, in civil matters, the violation of the right material (errores in iudicando) or procedural (errores in proceeding), the vices of motivation (lack, insufficiency or contradiction) of the judgment under appeal; or, again, the grounds for jurisdiction. A similar scheme is expected to appeal to the Supreme Court in criminal matters."
MC Axel
07.02.2025 kl 19:00
4571
Thank you!
That's exactly what I'm saying and thinking!
Copied from the Supreme Court in Rome: Link https://www.cortedicassazione.it/en/le_funzioni_della_corte.page
I have translated this to Norwegian (google t):
På første og fjerde linje "kan innleveres . . . motsigelse". Det er helt klart en selvmotsigelse av underretten. Så, ja, interessant.
«Anken i kassasjon
Kassasjonsanken kan inngis mot tiltakene som er utstedt av de ordinære domstolene på ankenivå eller bare i grad: grunnene som er gitt for å støtte bruken kan i sivile saker være brudd på rett materiale (feil i iudicando) eller prosessuelle (feil i saksbehandlingen), motivasjonen (manglende, mangelfull) dommen under anken eller dommen; eller, igjen, begrunnelsen for jurisdiksjon. En lignende ordning forventes å anke til Høyesterett i straffesaker."
That's exactly what I'm saying and thinking!
Copied from the Supreme Court in Rome: Link https://www.cortedicassazione.it/en/le_funzioni_della_corte.page
I have translated this to Norwegian (google t):
På første og fjerde linje "kan innleveres . . . motsigelse". Det er helt klart en selvmotsigelse av underretten. Så, ja, interessant.
«Anken i kassasjon
Kassasjonsanken kan inngis mot tiltakene som er utstedt av de ordinære domstolene på ankenivå eller bare i grad: grunnene som er gitt for å støtte bruken kan i sivile saker være brudd på rett materiale (feil i iudicando) eller prosessuelle (feil i saksbehandlingen), motivasjonen (manglende, mangelfull) dommen under anken eller dommen; eller, igjen, begrunnelsen for jurisdiksjon. En lignende ordning forventes å anke til Høyesterett i straffesaker."
Tony83
07.02.2025 kl 20:42
4513
MC Axel skrev Yes, the Aveleos case Should be soon
But when will RNS on the appeal in UBI banca case come? Today should be the deadline for the appeal!
MoJoMolv
07.02.2025 kl 23:21
4483
Lag deg en bruker her, så kan du se alle aksjonærer
https://www.aksjeeierregisteret.no/content/security/?orgnr=996411265
https://www.aksjeeierregisteret.no/content/security/?orgnr=996411265
vikingfan
08.02.2025 kl 23:01
4291
MC Axel
09.02.2025 kl 19:17
4125
vikingfan skrev Feil dato på side, men oppdatert liste for 04.02.2025.
Thank you 👍
MC Axel
09.02.2025 kl 19:30
4128
skadi skrev Ser ikke deg på listen MC Axel.....
The company would be No. 9 on the list, if shown
Nordnet Bank Ab nominee account
Nordnet Bank Ab nominee account
Tony83
09.02.2025 kl 20:19
4206
I have 1.5 mln shares! Still waiting for the RNS on the appeal in UBI Banca case!
Redigert 09.02.2025 kl 22:00
Du må logge inn for å svare
MC Axel
10.02.2025 kl 10:31
3964
I'm surprised more people haven't seen this and don't understand the significance
Tony83
10.02.2025 kl 10:45
4019
what is the significance, in your own words? where is the RNS on UBI Banca appeal?
MC Axel
10.02.2025 kl 12:14
4005
I am sure that EAM has appealed as promised, anything else will be blown out of proportion ;)
Tony83: Read this and you will see the significance:
HMPInvest skrev
Copied from the Supreme Court in Rome: Link https://www.cortedicassazione.it/en/le_funzioni_della_co..
Thank you!
That's exactly what I'm saying and thinking!
Copied from the Supreme Court in Rome: Link https://www.cortedicassazione.it/en/le_funzioni_della_corte.page
I have translated this to Norwegian (google t):
På første og fjerde linje "kan innleveres . . . motsigelse". Det er helt klart en selvmotsigelse av underretten. Så, ja, interessant.
«Anken i kassasjon
Kassasjonsanken kan inngis mot tiltakene som er utstedt av de ordinære domstolene på ankenivå eller bare i grad: grunnene som er gitt for å støtte bruken kan i sivile saker være brudd på rett materiale (feil i iudicando) eller prosessuelle (feil i saksbehandlingen), motivasjonen (manglende, mangelfull) dommen under anken eller dommen; eller, igjen, begrunnelsen for jurisdiksjon. En lignende ordning forventes å anke til Høyesterett i straffesaker."
Tony83: Read this and you will see the significance:
HMPInvest skrev
Copied from the Supreme Court in Rome: Link https://www.cortedicassazione.it/en/le_funzioni_della_co..
Thank you!
That's exactly what I'm saying and thinking!
Copied from the Supreme Court in Rome: Link https://www.cortedicassazione.it/en/le_funzioni_della_corte.page
I have translated this to Norwegian (google t):
På første og fjerde linje "kan innleveres . . . motsigelse". Det er helt klart en selvmotsigelse av underretten. Så, ja, interessant.
«Anken i kassasjon
Kassasjonsanken kan inngis mot tiltakene som er utstedt av de ordinære domstolene på ankenivå eller bare i grad: grunnene som er gitt for å støtte bruken kan i sivile saker være brudd på rett materiale (feil i iudicando) eller prosessuelle (feil i saksbehandlingen), motivasjonen (manglende, mangelfull) dommen under anken eller dommen; eller, igjen, begrunnelsen for jurisdiksjon. En lignende ordning forventes å anke til Høyesterett i straffesaker."
Tony83
10.02.2025 kl 12:38
3979
Does it mean that if EAM's appeal of cassation will be taken into proceedings, then we should most probably win the case? That was your remark?
MC Axel
10.02.2025 kl 14:05
3945
If the Supreme Court accepts, then EAM has a good chance. The court does not give the green light if there is nothing to pursue
Of course, I can't say whether EAM will win, but it will at least strengthen their case a lot
P.S. As I understand it, EAM has 6 months to appeal the case regarding UBI and not 30 days (That's what I was told by EAM). In our case, it is a plus for us, as EAM has more time to work on the most important legal case
Of course, I can't say whether EAM will win, but it will at least strengthen their case a lot
P.S. As I understand it, EAM has 6 months to appeal the case regarding UBI and not 30 days (That's what I was told by EAM). In our case, it is a plus for us, as EAM has more time to work on the most important legal case
Redigert 10.02.2025 kl 14:15
Du må logge inn for å svare
Tony83
10.02.2025 kl 14:23
3976
Ok! I did not know that the deadline for the appeal is so long! They will certainly appeal. Now the question is, when we'll get to know on the acceptance of the appeal in Aveleos (i.e. the main) case!
MC Axel
10.02.2025 kl 14:30
3964
Yes, they will appeal. I forgot to say, EAM says they will announce it to the market when it is done.
From EAM "We will report as soon as we can on status"
In short, they are working on the case and of course they can't inform us more than this
P.S. The main case should not be far in the future
From EAM "We will report as soon as we can on status"
In short, they are working on the case and of course they can't inform us more than this
P.S. The main case should not be far in the future
Redigert 10.02.2025 kl 14:33
Du må logge inn for å svare
Tony83
10.02.2025 kl 21:52
4009
So the green ligh for the cassation in Aveleos case can come any minute from now on? Has EAM implied something in this regard? When do they expect the acceptance of the appeal in cassation?
MC Axel
11.02.2025 kl 09:08
3890
Yes, it can come like a bolt from the blue!
I think it will come very soon
I think it will come very soon
MC Axel
12.02.2025 kl 09:13
3672
Yes! 👍
Did copy this from Shareville
Oversat
Fik dette svar fra Viktor, da jeg spurgte til anke.
"Ankefristen på 30 dage gælder fra den dato, UBI har offentliggjort dommen - dette er endnu ikke gjort af UBI.
Den generelle klagefrist er 6 måneder - vi vil snart give en opdatering."
Did copy this from Shareville
Oversat
Fik dette svar fra Viktor, da jeg spurgte til anke.
"Ankefristen på 30 dage gælder fra den dato, UBI har offentliggjort dommen - dette er endnu ikke gjort af UBI.
Den generelle klagefrist er 6 måneder - vi vil snart give en opdatering."
MC Axel
12.02.2025 kl 09:33
3750
It's sad for those who are now selling for pennies
Aveleos case, can happen like lightning
Aveleos case, can happen like lightning
vikingfan
13.02.2025 kl 10:57
3537
Går noen større poster.
Mulig vi slutter i grønt i dag.
Håper News snart kan få oss mot 1 kr pr. aksje.
Mulig vi slutter i grønt i dag.
Håper News snart kan få oss mot 1 kr pr. aksje.
MC Axel
13.02.2025 kl 11:23
3516
There are many penny stocks on the Oslo Stock Exchange that have risen several 100% this year.
If the Supreme Court upholds EAM Solar's appeal, then EAM will be the stock of the year, mark my words
There is always a risk with such a stock, but the rewards can be astronomical.
P.S.
I have read on Shareville that someone calls the EAM company scammers. It is EAM that is being scammed in Italy. I often hear the same about Mr. Binnion in Questerre energy, it is not Mr. Binnion's fault, but mainly Quebec that is entirely to blame for the fact that things have not gone well for QEC
If the Supreme Court upholds EAM Solar's appeal, then EAM will be the stock of the year, mark my words
There is always a risk with such a stock, but the rewards can be astronomical.
P.S.
I have read on Shareville that someone calls the EAM company scammers. It is EAM that is being scammed in Italy. I often hear the same about Mr. Binnion in Questerre energy, it is not Mr. Binnion's fault, but mainly Quebec that is entirely to blame for the fact that things have not gone well for QEC
Redigert 13.02.2025 kl 11:45
Du må logge inn for å svare
MC Axel
13.02.2025 kl 14:05
3542
I SAID SO!
The fact that the Supreme Court has taken up the case shows that the previous ruling was wrong!!!
The fact that the Supreme Court has taken up the case shows that the previous ruling was wrong!!!
MC Axel
13.02.2025 kl 15:04
3612
I have 3 million shares in EAM Solar and I have decided not to sell. The reason is that EAM Solar needs to be upgraded significantly.
Those who read the case and have only a little knowledge of law know that the verdict from July 4, 2024, was a scandal. Two different case decisions in the same case, completely unheard of!
I have confidence in the Supreme Court, and that is also why you have chosen to take up the case and hear it
Those who read the case and have only a little knowledge of law know that the verdict from July 4, 2024, was a scandal. Two different case decisions in the same case, completely unheard of!
I have confidence in the Supreme Court, and that is also why you have chosen to take up the case and hear it
MC Axel
13.02.2025 kl 15:58
3540
With 99 million shares traded today (total 153 million shares in the company)!!! 2/3 of all the shares traded :)
I'm sure that those who wanted out have sold and the rest of us who see much greater potential here and who know the business will stay put. This means that many new shareholders have also joined, wellcome!
I'm sure that those who wanted out have sold and the rest of us who see much greater potential here and who know the business will stay put. This means that many new shareholders have also joined, wellcome!
Redigert 13.02.2025 kl 17:50
Du må logge inn for å svare
MC Axel
13.02.2025 kl 17:33
3477
:)
This ain't bad !!! :)
On February 13, 2025, Nordnet AB (publ), through its subsidiary Nordnet Livsforsikring AS, net bought 4,123,909 shares in EAM Solar
https://newsweb.oslobors.no/message/638687
This ain't bad !!! :)
On February 13, 2025, Nordnet AB (publ), through its subsidiary Nordnet Livsforsikring AS, net bought 4,123,909 shares in EAM Solar
https://newsweb.oslobors.no/message/638687
MC Axel
14.02.2025 kl 00:46
3330
Remember, there is a big difference this time than what was on the 4th of July 2024
As said before, the Italian state won its case against Aveleos..... and EAM Solar lost the same case against Aveleos.....
The fact that the Supreme Court is taking up the case is without a doubt a major legal error has been made regarding the evidence "the forged documents" in the case. It was granted in the Italian case and rejected in the EAM case
– Det er en åpenbar logisk feil
"– For det første er de dømt for svindel mot den italienske staten på grunn av de forfalskede dokumentene. De samme dokumentene ble brukt til å bedra oss. Det er en åpenbar logisk feil her, sier Jakobsen"
https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2024/10/10/8190474/eam-solar-anker-beslutning
I am 99.99% sure that the decision will be in EAM Solar's favor this time and that they will succeed. Because there has already been a ruling in the same case, which is still in force, and it is the ruling that the Italian state won.
There is a principle in the legal system that equal cases should be treated equally.
I don't think it's impossible that we'll go up to +5 NOK before March 18th
And those investors who understand the significance of this, the fact that the Supreme Court has taken up the case, will hold onto the stock, there are 2.5 billion reasons for that. The Supreme Court only takes up cases where there is a basis for taking up a case, if not, it is dismissed.
God luck!
As said before, the Italian state won its case against Aveleos..... and EAM Solar lost the same case against Aveleos.....
The fact that the Supreme Court is taking up the case is without a doubt a major legal error has been made regarding the evidence "the forged documents" in the case. It was granted in the Italian case and rejected in the EAM case
– Det er en åpenbar logisk feil
"– For det første er de dømt for svindel mot den italienske staten på grunn av de forfalskede dokumentene. De samme dokumentene ble brukt til å bedra oss. Det er en åpenbar logisk feil her, sier Jakobsen"
https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2024/10/10/8190474/eam-solar-anker-beslutning
I am 99.99% sure that the decision will be in EAM Solar's favor this time and that they will succeed. Because there has already been a ruling in the same case, which is still in force, and it is the ruling that the Italian state won.
There is a principle in the legal system that equal cases should be treated equally.
I don't think it's impossible that we'll go up to +5 NOK before March 18th
And those investors who understand the significance of this, the fact that the Supreme Court has taken up the case, will hold onto the stock, there are 2.5 billion reasons for that. The Supreme Court only takes up cases where there is a basis for taking up a case, if not, it is dismissed.
God luck!
Redigert 14.02.2025 kl 00:47
Du må logge inn for å svare
MC Axel
14.02.2025 kl 09:10
3161
Remember that everything under 1 NOK is super cheap
The compensation is 16.34 NOK per share!
The compensation is 16.34 NOK per share!
IDGAF
14.02.2025 kl 09:17
3128
Dette blir stoooort 🤑
Husk det pågår også forhandlinger som de ikke kunne kommentere... 😉
Kan komme noe forlik når tid som helst før dommen 18 mars også 💥
🚀🚀🚀
60 øre til 10 kr forrige gang 😎 Blir noen kroner nå også..
Glem høydeskrekk en stund 🥳
Husk det pågår også forhandlinger som de ikke kunne kommentere... 😉
Kan komme noe forlik når tid som helst før dommen 18 mars også 💥
🚀🚀🚀
60 øre til 10 kr forrige gang 😎 Blir noen kroner nå også..
Glem høydeskrekk en stund 🥳
elnomi
14.02.2025 kl 09:21
3145
Gå inn på nordnet formum og les innlegget til Gullmusa, tenker vi ser mellom 0,60-0,70 innen slutt i dag?
Utdraget under er starten av innlegget
"Motparten kan nok raskt få kalde føtter her nå når saken er tilbake i høyesterett. Slik jeg tolker meldingen i dag kan et forlik fort bli løsningen, EAM har åpenbart en god sak nå uten tvil. Høringen er allerede innen en måned og avgjørelse ventet kort tid etter. Enighet om oppgjør/forlik kan komme som lyn fra klar himmel også før høringen....."
Utdraget under er starten av innlegget
"Motparten kan nok raskt få kalde føtter her nå når saken er tilbake i høyesterett. Slik jeg tolker meldingen i dag kan et forlik fort bli løsningen, EAM har åpenbart en god sak nå uten tvil. Høringen er allerede innen en måned og avgjørelse ventet kort tid etter. Enighet om oppgjør/forlik kan komme som lyn fra klar himmel også før høringen....."
MC Axel
14.02.2025 kl 09:31
3100
I know 👍
Also remember that the case has changed radically since EAM Solar lost its case in court on July 4. The fact that the Supreme Court has taken up the case again is a fact that there were errors in the previous judgment.
Also remember that the case has changed radically since EAM Solar lost its case in court on July 4. The fact that the Supreme Court has taken up the case again is a fact that there were errors in the previous judgment.
MC Axel
14.02.2025 kl 09:35
3115
Thank yoiu 👍
I have 3 million shares and I'm not selling. It will go way above the krone!
I have 3 million shares and I'm not selling. It will go way above the krone!
HMPInvest
14.02.2025 kl 09:38
3133
Yes, totally agree. The Supreme Court has obviously spotted the contradiction in ruling by the under courts. It's a major step in the right direction for EAM. A settlement is definitely in the game.
Wild . . . . think too 5 nok before 18th of March.
Wild . . . . think too 5 nok before 18th of March.
X-43 scramjet
14.02.2025 kl 11:13
3112
5 kr er fint tall. Nå kan EAM vinne. Er enig kan komme et forlik eller en vennlig løsning, de har blitt svindlet kjøp av disse solparkene
IDGAF
14.02.2025 kl 11:44
3073
ALLE frie aksjer har byttet hender siste 2 dager nå 😎
ALLE piler sier kraftig stigning fremover nå 😉
Husker altfor godt i høst når jeg solgte med ca 200% gevinst på 2 kroningen... Har mareritt om det enda da den stakk videre noe sykt 🙈🤣
Nå kan det bli enda mer spinnvilt 🥳
Som forrige gang lagger det litt innimellom de store rekylene ✅
Blir raskt mot 70 øre i ettermiddag nå og 1 kr runder vi neste uke 💥
Gratulerer alle som er inne 🥰
🚀🚀🚀
ALLE piler sier kraftig stigning fremover nå 😉
Husker altfor godt i høst når jeg solgte med ca 200% gevinst på 2 kroningen... Har mareritt om det enda da den stakk videre noe sykt 🙈🤣
Nå kan det bli enda mer spinnvilt 🥳
Som forrige gang lagger det litt innimellom de store rekylene ✅
Blir raskt mot 70 øre i ettermiddag nå og 1 kr runder vi neste uke 💥
Gratulerer alle som er inne 🥰
🚀🚀🚀