Er det bare meg, eller har kursen holdt seg mistenkelig lenge rundt 2,20 kr. Som om den har vinket farvel til å vake rundt 2,00 kr.

Som vi har skjønt lenge, politikerne i Canada og Quebec må pga Trump fremover tenke helt nytt for å sikre arbeidsplasser, skatteinntekter og vekst.
………….
Canada: Verre enn 9/11, Lehman og corona
Det har aldri vært dårligere stemning blant kanadiske små og mellomstore bedrifter, ifølge Bank of America.
https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2025/03/21/8251758/canada-verre-enn-9-11-lehman-og-corona

👍

https://www.westernstandard.news/alberta/quebec-report-shows-resistance-to-pipelines-cost-38-billion-in-trade-war-with-us/63272

Litt interessant lesing syns jeg.

"Call it an opportunity cost on the order of $32 million per day, or $38 billion per year.

That’s how much Ottawa’s — and Quebec’s — footdragging on a pair of oil and natural gas pipelines to the East Coast have cost Canada in its trade war with the US, according to a new study from the Montreal Economic Insitute."

"The cancellation of these projects was largely driven by resistance from Quebec and other parts of Eastern Canada, where provincial governments and environmental activists campaigned against new fossil fuel infrastructure.

Even now, Quebec Premier François Legault has dismissed oil pipelines as “socially unacceptable.”

However, public sentiment has shifted dramatically. A recent poll cited in the MEI report indicates that a majority of Quebecers now support pipeline construction in light of escalating US tariffs.

Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper recently spoke at the Raisina Dialogue, India’s largest geopolitical conference, calling for Canada to immediately revive an eastern pipeline. “We need to build a pipeline in the east so we can supply our own country with energy,” Harper said."

Helt enig en kjempe kjøps mulighet, stiger sakte men sikkert nå. Tror den reprises snart til 3,5-4 kr. får en gass utvinning går qec i 70-80 kr

Kommer snart et rykk i QEC.
Fin kjøpsmulighet dette.

https://www.conservative.ca/poilievre-announces-plan-to-get-gnl-quebec-built-without-delay/

Major projects like GNL Quebec in Saguenay will be fast-tracked by new designation announced by Canada First Conservatives.

Jonquière, QC – Today Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was in Saguenay to announce his plan to accelerate the completion of GNL Quebec by designating it a “Canada Shovel Ready Zone.”

These new zones will be areas pre-approved and pre-permitted for construction of major projects like mines, data centres, power plants and LNG liquefaction facilities. That means the permits will not just take less time, but will already be done without an application, so companies will have certainty to invest and get started.

That speed and certainty will bring back investors to regions like Saguenay following a Lost Liberal Decade of blocking projects like GNL Quebec. Poilievre’s new approach will bring home thousands of jobs for Canadian workers in regions like Saguenay and take back control of our economy from the Americans.

A Canada First Conservative Government will get the Canada Shovel Ready Zones done:

Identify a location that makes sense for a power station, LNG plant, pipeline, or other major project.
Make sure it is safe for Canadians and the environment—with rigorous study.
Work with other levels of government and consult with First Nations to lock down zoning, permits and conditions for construction to go ahead.
Offer pre-permitting before even getting an application so that permits could be published online with a checklist of requirements to protect nature and people. Businesses would still be required to meet health, safety and environmental requirements.
This means businesses could buy the land, hire people and build, knowing they already have the permits. GNL Quebec is a perfect example of how the Canada Shovel Ready Zones will bring home jobs.

“Think of an area that is perfect for liquifying and exporting gas like right here in Saguenay,” said Poilievre. “We would publish a permit online, with normal safety and environment requirements. Then, companies can come in immediately and begin building and hiring Canadians that will earn powerful 6 figure paycheques. This would also allow us to ship Canadian energy off to Europe, breaking European dependence on Russian gas, while turning dollars for dictators into paycheques for our people.”

Canada First Conservatives will work with all levels of government to ensure projects are completed as quickly as they can be built and without needless delays.

https://montreal.citynews.ca/2025/03/20/gnl-quebec-poilievre-convince-quebecers/amp/

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a news conference in Delta B.C., on Thursday, Jan.16, 2025. Poilievre has indicated that he doesn't mind if public servants work from home, as long as their work gets done. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Ethan Cairns
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre wants to revive the GNL Quebec liquefied gas project and “believes he can convince Quebecers” of its relevance, even though it was rejected at the time, notably due to a lack of social acceptability.

“The status quo, where we sell 100 per cent of our natural gas to the United States to benefit Donald Trump, has no social acceptability,” the Conservative leader declared during a press scrum Thursday in Jonquière, in Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean.

In 2021, Quebec refused to authorize the Saguenay pipeline and GNL terminal project to export Albertan natural gas. Ottawa did the same in 2022.

Advertisement

However, the U.S. tariffs have led to a change of tone on this side of the border. Quebec and Ottawa recently reopened the door to the project.

“GNL Québec could be the cleanest natural gas liquefaction plant in the world. Why? Because it will be powered by zero-emission hydroelectricity,” added the Conservative leader.

In April 2021, the report from the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement (BAPE) clearly stated there was no social acceptability in the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region and that the project had not demonstrated its relevance.

The plant’s objective was to export 11 million tonnes of natural gas from Western Canada to Europe and Asia by sea each year for a period of 25 to 50 years. A 780-kilometre-long gas pipeline was also to be built by Gazoduq to transport the gas from Ontario to the Saguenay region.

‘Canadian build-ready zones’
Poilievre was also in the region to announce that if elected premier, he intends to accelerate energy projects like GNL Québec. To do this, he wants to designate areas as “Canadian build-ready zones.”

Advertisement

These would effectively be “pre-approved and pre-authorized zones” for the construction of projects such as mines, data centres, power plants, and GNL liquefaction plants. The goal, among other things, is to speed up the granting of permits to allow companies to build more quickly.

The Conservative leader indicated he intended to work with the Quebec government to grant this designation to Saguenay to accelerate the liquefied natural gas plant project.

Når jeg gikk inn for første gang for ca. 4 år siden, var kursen 1,13. Husker han SteveX typen hamret løs flere ganger om dagen i forumet om at emisjonen var nær, Binnon var en svindler, og alt var over for Qec. At den har doblet seg sakte men sikkert over ca. 4 år er en "fin utvikling". Men håper på mer så klart.

Er det ikke nuläget vi aksjeeiere er opptatt av? Eller hvilket perspektiv har du på ditt aksjeliv?

Man kan med de aller fleste aksjer plukke ut et tidsintervall med en «fin utvikling».

Aksjen er opp 21,5 % de siste 3 måneder, er ikke det en fin utvikling, så forstår ikke jeg??

Utvikling? Hvor ser du dette?

Nydelig utvikling, som jeg skrev step for step betyr at en god nyhet etterfølges av flere, lett å gjøre den feilen å hoppe av et tog ved første stoppested. Toget går som regel videre. Nærmer oss april så dette blir spennede ....

Det som kan få makroøknomisk betydning, er Peak Oil for skifer i USA.

Oljeproduksjon fra skifer, skalerte fort og høyt opp i løpet av få år. Det er spådommer om at den vil nå toppen i løpet av de nærmeste åra, og etterhvert kan den gå fort nedover.
Oljeproduksjonen i USA er faktisk svært stor, men den kan fort gå nedover.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvxA5gi-fuM
https://peakprosperity.com/the-return-of-peak-oil-why-it-matters-and-whats-next/

Fikk opp sida i Firefox:
Install the User-Agent Switcher extension: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/uaswitcher/
Deretter klikka jeg på Extensions oppe til høyre, og valgte en annen brukeragent. F.eks Firefox for Android eller Edge for Windows.

Problemet er med Firefox 136.0.2
Det virker ok med Edge.
Har dessverre en forkjærlighet til Mozilla, som jeg har brukt fra starten av.
Må muligens krype til korset.

https://financialpost.com/commodities/energy/oil-gas/its-time-for-canadians-to-challenge-the-american-domination-of-the-lng-space

Fra shareville:
https://calgaryherald.com/business/declare-a-energy-crisis-and-approve-major-projects-within-six-months-says-canadas-oil-and-gas-leaders

Edit:
Nå har "MDG" begynt å bry seg om den pågående handelskrigen..
Nervøse for hva regjeringen rasler med i kulissene?

https://environmentaldefence.ca/2025/03/19/statement-oil-and-gas-companies-want-to-gut-canadas-hard-fought-climate-progress/

Ok,mulig det kommer ei drittpakke fra den kanten da......ingenting å bry seg om da 😁

Vet ikke hva han sier...og har forsåvidt ikke interresse av det heller.
I mine øyne er mannen ett avskum , og jeg synes synd på de som er opptatt av "investornytt"

Det jeg antar er at QEC har gjordt en bakgrunnsjekk av mister teigland , og de stiller de naturligvis ikke til intervju..

Det naturlige er nå at Teigland blir sur, for så å anbefale salg av aksjen...uten at det vil ha nevneverdig å si for kursen

Linken fungerer her, har prøvd den. Prøv og kopier den og lim den inn i nettleseren

njn

Det er samme artikkel som jeg la ut 11.29 i dag. Der ligger hele artikkelen ute.

Får ikke opp artikkelen
Error 403 - Forbidden access.

Ja valget i år har den største betydning for fremtidige gas og olie energisikkerhedsprojekter år frem…

“Realiteten er imidlertid at den føderale regjeringen ikke trenger noen spesiell lisens for å bygge olje- og gassinfrastruktur som krysser provinsgrenser.
I henhold til grunnloven er det bare det føderale parlamentet som har jurisdiksjon over nasjonale rørlednings- og energiprosjekter.

Til tross for denne myndigheten har ingen føderal regjering vært villig til å påtvinge en provins et slikt prosjekt. Quebecs historie med å motstå føderal intervensjon gjør dette til en politisk ømfintlig sak. Det er også en bredere valgbetraktning: Selv om det er mulig å danne en føderal regjering uten å vinne Quebec, gjør dens mange seter det til en avgjørende kampplass.
I et tospråklig land har en regjering som hevder å snakke for alle kanadiere fordel av å ha en tilstedeværelse i Quebec.

Ottawa kan påtvinge en nasjonal rørledning, men det trenger det ikke.
Nye meningsmålingsdata fra Quebec og over hele Canada tyder på at kanadiere i økende grad støtter prosjekter som forbedrer energisikkerheten og reduserer avhengigheten av USA.
Den føderale regjeringen må slutte å snakke bare til politikere – spesielt i Quebec – og ta saken direkte til folket.

Med et føderalt valg i horisonten, bør politikere fra alle partier sette nasjonale rørledninger og naturgassprosjekter på stemmeseddelen”

Canadas nye premierminister Mark Carney besøger Europa for at sikker sig fællesskabssikkerhedsaftaler m.fl.(emner og strategier fastlægges).
Herefter kommer tingene til at ske hurtigt i Canada, tror jeg…

Det kommer til å gå opp mot 3kr jevnt å trutt fremover uansett om dere liker det eller ikke.
Det blir dobling av prodden åkke som.👌

"Støtte til nasjonale rørledninger og LNG-prosjekter får fart, selv i Quebec"

https://troymedia.com/viewpoint/pipelines-have-public-support-as-a-path-to-energy-security/

Pipelines have public support as a path to energy security
By Joseph Quesnel | Mar 18, 2025

Reading Time: 3 minutes
Support for national pipelines and LNG projects gain momentum, even in Quebec


The ongoing threats posed by U.S. tariffs on the Canadian economy have caused many Canadians to reconsider the need for national oil pipelines and other major resource projects.

The United States is Canada’s most significant trading partner, and the two countries have enjoyed over a century of peaceful commerce and good relations. However, the onset of tariffs and increasingly hostile rhetoric has made Canadians realize they should not be taking these good relations for granted.

Traditional opposition to energy development has given way to a renewed focus on energy security and domestic self-reliance. Over the last decade, Canadian energy producers have sought to build pipelines to move oil from landlocked Alberta to tidewater, aiming to reduce reliance on U.S. markets and expand exports internationally. Canada’s dependence on the U.S. for energy exports has long affected the prices it can obtain.

Public opinion on pipelines has shifted. Will Ottawa seize the moment for energy security or let politics stall progress?
With an election on the horizon, politicians of all parties should put pipelines and natural gas projects on the ballot.

One province where this shift is becoming evident is Quebec. Historically, Quebec politicians and environmental interests have vehemently opposed oil and gas development. With an abundance of hydroelectric power, imported oil and gas, and little fossil fuel production, the province has had fewer economic incentives to support the industry.

However, recent polling suggests attitudes are changing. A SOM-La Presse poll from late February found that about 60 per cent of Quebec residents support reviving the Energy East pipeline project, while 61 per cent favour restarting the GNL Quebec natural gas pipeline project, a proposed LNG facility near Saguenay that would export liquefied natural gas to global markets. While support for these projects remains stronger in other parts of the country, this represents a substantial shift in Quebec.

Yet, despite this change, Quebec politicians at both the provincial and federal levels remain out of step with public opinion. The Montreal Economic Institute, a non-partisan think tank, has documented this disconnect for years. There are two key reasons for it: Quebec politicians tend to reflect the perspectives of a Montreal-based Laurentian elite rather than broader provincial sentiment, and entrenched interests such as Hydro-Québec benefit from limiting competition under the guise of environmental concerns.

Not only have Quebec politicians misrepresented public opinion, but they have also claimed to speak for the entire province on energy issues. Premier François Legault and Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet have argued that pipeline projects lack “social licence” from Quebecers.

However, the reality is that the federal government does not need any special licence to build oil and gas infrastructure that crosses provincial borders. Under the Constitution, only the federal Parliament has jurisdiction over national pipeline and energy projects.

Despite this authority, no federal government has been willing to impose such a project on a province. Quebec’s history of resisting federal intervention makes this a politically delicate issue. There is also a broader electoral consideration: while it is possible to form a federal government without winning Quebec, its many seats make it a crucial battleground. In a bilingual country, a government that claims to speak for all Canadians benefits from having a presence in Quebec.

Ottawa could impose a national pipeline, but it doesn’t have to. New polling data from Quebec and across Canada suggest Canadians increasingly support projects that enhance energy security and reduce reliance on the United States. The federal government needs to stop speaking only to politicians—especially in Quebec—and take its case directly to the people.

With a federal election on the horizon, politicians of all parties should put national pipelines and natural gas projects on the ballot.

Joseph Quesnel is a senior research fellow with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

Hva sa Teigland om at det ikke ble noe intervju?
Noen begrunnelse til det?

Regner med du fikk svar på det av han?

Hmm ja investornytt v/ teigland fikk ikke sitt intervju med QEC - som jeg antok

Investornytt 09.03.25 Ukens aksje – 25-30% bør denne aksjen klare!

Tipper QEC fannt ut at Teigland var en høyst tvilsom kar , som flere ganger har vært i finanstilsynes søkelys.
Ikke mange seriøse selskapet som lar seg intervjue av "ei finans-rotta"
https://www.finansavisen.no/tema/espen_teigland

Fra Shareville:

Punkt 4 i Canada first plan: «Scrap the anti liberal energy law c-69 and greenlight LNG plants, pipelines, mines, factories and port expansions to get more of Canadas goods to more customers of overseas markets»

---
Egne ord: Får håpe CAQ kopierer valgløftet til "Canada First: 😅

Edit:
Legger ved linken til de konservative partiet og valgløfter deres.

https://www.conservative.ca/cpc/canada-first/

Det kommer en brikke idag! Vi må bare vente på utfallet.
https://www.ledevoir.com/politique/quebec/855223/importantes-consultations-energie-quebec-amorceront-semaine-prochaine

Har en sterk følelse at brikkene faller på plass en for en med dominoeffekt. Vi ser at det brygger seg opp til utbrudd fra kilen som startet i 2008 og antagelig bryter ut nå innen måneder fremover i tid. Ganske sikker på at dette året blir minnerik.

Dette var UTA og RL

Herlig👍 Som forventet, takk for info🤞

https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/qec?countrycode=ca&mod=mw_quote_recentlyviewed

The threat of tariffs and lingering economic volatility has prompted the Quebec government to reconsider a pipeline project bringing natural gas from Western Canada to the province before liquefying it and shipping it overseas.

Quebec nixed the project, known as LNG-Québec, in 2021, for environmental reasons. But now, with economic uncertainty surrounding the province's relationship with the U.S., its largest trading partner, Quebec's environment minister said the government is interested in taking another look at it.

"We're not opposed to energy projects that respect the environmental criteria," Benoit Charette, the environment minister, told reporters at the National Assembly on Wednesday.

Det er bevegelse.

The threat of tariffs and lingering economic volatility has prompted the Quebec government to reconsider a pipeline project bringing natural gas from Western Canada to the province before liquefying it and shipping it overseas.

Quebec nixed the project, known as LNG-Québec, in 2021, for environmental reasons. But now, with economic uncertainty surrounding the province's relationship with the U.S., its largest trading partner, Quebec's environment minister said the government is interested in taking another look at it.

"We're not opposed to energy projects that respect the environmental criteria," Benoit Charette, the environment minister, told reporters at the National Assembly on Wednesday.

Det er bevegelse.

MB sagde at 1 af disse nye brønde som er på vej er en testbrønd med længere pad(dybte) som giver større udbytte.
Om denne bliver en succes vil QEC bruge denne brøndtype som standart fremover og derned også større udbytte.

Venter på test resultat af denne brønd, vigtig data…

Jeg leste et sted i en Qec rapport, eller var det Binnon som har sagt det på et møte? Angående de nyeste brønnene så er meningen at produksjonen på noen av dem, kan forventes å produsere opp mot 20 tusen fat per dag, over tid. Husker ikke nøyaktig, men er 100% sikker at jeg leste fra Qec om at produksjonen kan forventes over de neste årene å stige betraktelig mer enn i dag - da pga noen av de nyeste brønnene som nå blir koblet på kan potensielt ha en mye større kapasitet enn tidligere brønner.

https://tradedesk.dk/stock/qec.ol

@Iv, ja du har ett poeng og det er decline som vi har og har hatt til en hver tid, så ja her må det bores nye brønner hele tiden ellers vil vi ikke få det ønskede løftet i produksjonen!!

Det er helt forståelig at kursen ikke går selv om det har blitt varslet at produksjonen vil komme til å øke, dette har jo blitt sagt før uten at det har skjedd, så markedet må se det svart på hvit før de tror på det.

Oljeprisen har til nå ikke påvirket kursen i Qec, så det gjenstår også å se.

Det blir interessant å se om den økte produksjonen kommer, og dernest om kursen til Qec deretter vil bli mer påvirket av oljeprisen enn den har vært tidligere.

Problemet her er at de aldri har evnet å øke produksjonen nevneverdig se siste 15 årene eller mer. De har brønner med avtakende produksjon over tid hele veien her...men for all del, vi får se...

Takk for info 1013👍
Ultimo april eller juni, da er de ivertfall forhåpentligvis i produksjon og bidrar allerede i Q2 resultatet👏