Diskusjon omkring Questerres vei framover, sky is in the limit
Vil påstå at vi står foran en gamechanger i Questerre , brikkene faller på plass , i mitt hode vil det kansje bli så stort som oppgangen i april mai 2008.
Pussig nok nærmer vi oss april 2025, kan brikkene plutselig falle på plass samtidig ?
Den fundamentale sammen med det tekniske støtter dette.
Vil understreke at dette er min personlige mening så ikke kjøp på annet enn sine egne meninger.
Pussig nok nærmer vi oss april 2025, kan brikkene plutselig falle på plass samtidig ?
Den fundamentale sammen med det tekniske støtter dette.
Vil understreke at dette er min personlige mening så ikke kjøp på annet enn sine egne meninger.
Redigert 14.03.2025 kl 22:23
Du må logge inn for å svare
Storms
22.03.2025 kl 09:24
5195
Det bliver int om der kommer et mistillid vota til nuværende regering når parlamentet træder sammen næste uge.
Om mistillid bliver stillet så bliver det nyvalg og så er alt muligt. Men om de politiske partier vil dette i Canada -nu hvor der er uro, er heller ikke sikkert da de i fællesskab har fokus på Canadas fremtid…
Med så meget som sker i denne periode som kan have indvirkning på QEC vil det sansynligvis være et godt sted at have en inv i og have liggende…
Om mistillid bliver stillet så bliver det nyvalg og så er alt muligt. Men om de politiske partier vil dette i Canada -nu hvor der er uro, er heller ikke sikkert da de i fællesskab har fokus på Canadas fremtid…
Med så meget som sker i denne periode som kan have indvirkning på QEC vil det sansynligvis være et godt sted at have en inv i og have liggende…
Redigert 22.03.2025 kl 09:25
Du må logge inn for å svare
Fjellbris
22.03.2025 kl 09:24
5194
Storms - takk for god info, spennende og som forventet mtp. «Trump effekten»👍
Storms
22.03.2025 kl 08:49
5262
“Etter sitt torsdagsmøte med Carney, skisserte Smith en liste med ni krav til den neste statsministeren… Listen inkluderer krav til den føderale regjeringen om å garantere Alberta full tilgang til olje- og gasskorridorer, oppheve Bill C-69 og eliminere olje- og gassutslippsgrensen”
“Ved en boligkunngjøring på torsdag Statsminister Mark Carney at han kan være villig til å gå bort fra utslippstak for olje- og gasselskaper og sa i morgenmøtet med Smith at de to diskuterte «å få ting gjort», inkludert å bygge flere rørledninger over hele Canada.
Han sa at en del av planen vil være å implementere ny lovgivning for å fremskynde leveringen av disse prosjektene”
https://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/alberta-danielle-smith-emissions-cap-first-ministers
Storms
22.03.2025 kl 08:35
5270
Endeligt lysner det…
“ Quebec Premier sier at opinionen skifter i provinsen om olje- og gassrørledninger.
Quebec-premier François Legault sier opinionen er i endring i Quebec, hvor det tradisjonelt har vært betydelig motstand mot olje- og gassrørledninger.
Vi er åpne for denne typen prosjekter," sa han til journalister.
Han sa at Quebec alltid har opprettholdt en forutsetning for at nye rørledninger som krysser territoriet må oppnå "sosial aksept fra Quebec-befolkningen."
Imidlertid sa han at han ser akkurat nå, gitt "hva Donald Trump sier, at "oppfatningen endrer seg akkurat nå" i Quebec”
Fra en anden artikel 20 marts.
“ Poilievre fremmer gjenoppliving av LNG-prosjektet i Quebecs Saguenay-region”
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-poilievre-promotes-reviving-lng-project-in-quebecs-saguenay-region/?_gl=1*1hxj3vu*_gcl_au*NjgzNzc0MDY0LjE3NDI2Mjg0MDU.*_ga*MjkwNjIwNjc1LjE3NDI2Mjg0MDg.*_ga_DH5MGZVVNS*MTc0MjYyODQwOC4xLjEuMTc0MjYyODc0MC4yMy4wLjA.
“ Quebec Premier sier at opinionen skifter i provinsen om olje- og gassrørledninger.
Quebec-premier François Legault sier opinionen er i endring i Quebec, hvor det tradisjonelt har vært betydelig motstand mot olje- og gassrørledninger.
Vi er åpne for denne typen prosjekter," sa han til journalister.
Han sa at Quebec alltid har opprettholdt en forutsetning for at nye rørledninger som krysser territoriet må oppnå "sosial aksept fra Quebec-befolkningen."
Imidlertid sa han at han ser akkurat nå, gitt "hva Donald Trump sier, at "oppfatningen endrer seg akkurat nå" i Quebec”
Fra en anden artikel 20 marts.
“ Poilievre fremmer gjenoppliving av LNG-prosjektet i Quebecs Saguenay-region”
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-poilievre-promotes-reviving-lng-project-in-quebecs-saguenay-region/?_gl=1*1hxj3vu*_gcl_au*NjgzNzc0MDY0LjE3NDI2Mjg0MDU.*_ga*MjkwNjIwNjc1LjE3NDI2Mjg0MDg.*_ga_DH5MGZVVNS*MTc0MjYyODQwOC4xLjEuMTc0MjYyODc0MC4yMy4wLjA.
Forsiktig
21.03.2025 kl 16:31
5898
Er det bare meg, eller har kursen holdt seg mistenkelig lenge rundt 2,20 kr. Som om den har vinket farvel til å vake rundt 2,00 kr.
Fjellbris
21.03.2025 kl 14:15
6090
Som vi har skjønt lenge, politikerne i Canada og Quebec må pga Trump fremover tenke helt nytt for å sikre arbeidsplasser, skatteinntekter og vekst.
………….
Canada: Verre enn 9/11, Lehman og corona
Det har aldri vært dårligere stemning blant kanadiske små og mellomstore bedrifter, ifølge Bank of America.
https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2025/03/21/8251758/canada-verre-enn-9-11-lehman-og-corona
………….
Canada: Verre enn 9/11, Lehman og corona
Det har aldri vært dårligere stemning blant kanadiske små og mellomstore bedrifter, ifølge Bank of America.
https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2025/03/21/8251758/canada-verre-enn-9-11-lehman-og-corona
Redigert 21.03.2025 kl 14:17
Du må logge inn for å svare
BeffJezos
21.03.2025 kl 11:20
6453
https://www.westernstandard.news/alberta/quebec-report-shows-resistance-to-pipelines-cost-38-billion-in-trade-war-with-us/63272
Litt interessant lesing syns jeg.
"Call it an opportunity cost on the order of $32 million per day, or $38 billion per year.
That’s how much Ottawa’s — and Quebec’s — footdragging on a pair of oil and natural gas pipelines to the East Coast have cost Canada in its trade war with the US, according to a new study from the Montreal Economic Insitute."
"The cancellation of these projects was largely driven by resistance from Quebec and other parts of Eastern Canada, where provincial governments and environmental activists campaigned against new fossil fuel infrastructure.
Even now, Quebec Premier François Legault has dismissed oil pipelines as “socially unacceptable.”
However, public sentiment has shifted dramatically. A recent poll cited in the MEI report indicates that a majority of Quebecers now support pipeline construction in light of escalating US tariffs.
Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper recently spoke at the Raisina Dialogue, India’s largest geopolitical conference, calling for Canada to immediately revive an eastern pipeline. “We need to build a pipeline in the east so we can supply our own country with energy,” Harper said."
Litt interessant lesing syns jeg.
"Call it an opportunity cost on the order of $32 million per day, or $38 billion per year.
That’s how much Ottawa’s — and Quebec’s — footdragging on a pair of oil and natural gas pipelines to the East Coast have cost Canada in its trade war with the US, according to a new study from the Montreal Economic Insitute."
"The cancellation of these projects was largely driven by resistance from Quebec and other parts of Eastern Canada, where provincial governments and environmental activists campaigned against new fossil fuel infrastructure.
Even now, Quebec Premier François Legault has dismissed oil pipelines as “socially unacceptable.”
However, public sentiment has shifted dramatically. A recent poll cited in the MEI report indicates that a majority of Quebecers now support pipeline construction in light of escalating US tariffs.
Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper recently spoke at the Raisina Dialogue, India’s largest geopolitical conference, calling for Canada to immediately revive an eastern pipeline. “We need to build a pipeline in the east so we can supply our own country with energy,” Harper said."
Manon1
21.03.2025 kl 09:40
6705
Tobias skrev Kommer snart et rykk i QEC. Fin kjøpsmulighet dette.
Helt enig en kjempe kjøps mulighet, stiger sakte men sikkert nå. Tror den reprises snart til 3,5-4 kr. får en gass utvinning går qec i 70-80 kr
tuja
20.03.2025 kl 20:59
7512
https://www.conservative.ca/poilievre-announces-plan-to-get-gnl-quebec-built-without-delay/
Major projects like GNL Quebec in Saguenay will be fast-tracked by new designation announced by Canada First Conservatives.
Jonquière, QC – Today Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was in Saguenay to announce his plan to accelerate the completion of GNL Quebec by designating it a “Canada Shovel Ready Zone.”
These new zones will be areas pre-approved and pre-permitted for construction of major projects like mines, data centres, power plants and LNG liquefaction facilities. That means the permits will not just take less time, but will already be done without an application, so companies will have certainty to invest and get started.
That speed and certainty will bring back investors to regions like Saguenay following a Lost Liberal Decade of blocking projects like GNL Quebec. Poilievre’s new approach will bring home thousands of jobs for Canadian workers in regions like Saguenay and take back control of our economy from the Americans.
A Canada First Conservative Government will get the Canada Shovel Ready Zones done:
Identify a location that makes sense for a power station, LNG plant, pipeline, or other major project.
Make sure it is safe for Canadians and the environment—with rigorous study.
Work with other levels of government and consult with First Nations to lock down zoning, permits and conditions for construction to go ahead.
Offer pre-permitting before even getting an application so that permits could be published online with a checklist of requirements to protect nature and people. Businesses would still be required to meet health, safety and environmental requirements.
This means businesses could buy the land, hire people and build, knowing they already have the permits. GNL Quebec is a perfect example of how the Canada Shovel Ready Zones will bring home jobs.
“Think of an area that is perfect for liquifying and exporting gas like right here in Saguenay,” said Poilievre. “We would publish a permit online, with normal safety and environment requirements. Then, companies can come in immediately and begin building and hiring Canadians that will earn powerful 6 figure paycheques. This would also allow us to ship Canadian energy off to Europe, breaking European dependence on Russian gas, while turning dollars for dictators into paycheques for our people.”
Canada First Conservatives will work with all levels of government to ensure projects are completed as quickly as they can be built and without needless delays.
Major projects like GNL Quebec in Saguenay will be fast-tracked by new designation announced by Canada First Conservatives.
Jonquière, QC – Today Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was in Saguenay to announce his plan to accelerate the completion of GNL Quebec by designating it a “Canada Shovel Ready Zone.”
These new zones will be areas pre-approved and pre-permitted for construction of major projects like mines, data centres, power plants and LNG liquefaction facilities. That means the permits will not just take less time, but will already be done without an application, so companies will have certainty to invest and get started.
That speed and certainty will bring back investors to regions like Saguenay following a Lost Liberal Decade of blocking projects like GNL Quebec. Poilievre’s new approach will bring home thousands of jobs for Canadian workers in regions like Saguenay and take back control of our economy from the Americans.
A Canada First Conservative Government will get the Canada Shovel Ready Zones done:
Identify a location that makes sense for a power station, LNG plant, pipeline, or other major project.
Make sure it is safe for Canadians and the environment—with rigorous study.
Work with other levels of government and consult with First Nations to lock down zoning, permits and conditions for construction to go ahead.
Offer pre-permitting before even getting an application so that permits could be published online with a checklist of requirements to protect nature and people. Businesses would still be required to meet health, safety and environmental requirements.
This means businesses could buy the land, hire people and build, knowing they already have the permits. GNL Quebec is a perfect example of how the Canada Shovel Ready Zones will bring home jobs.
“Think of an area that is perfect for liquifying and exporting gas like right here in Saguenay,” said Poilievre. “We would publish a permit online, with normal safety and environment requirements. Then, companies can come in immediately and begin building and hiring Canadians that will earn powerful 6 figure paycheques. This would also allow us to ship Canadian energy off to Europe, breaking European dependence on Russian gas, while turning dollars for dictators into paycheques for our people.”
Canada First Conservatives will work with all levels of government to ensure projects are completed as quickly as they can be built and without needless delays.
tuja
20.03.2025 kl 20:57
7474
https://montreal.citynews.ca/2025/03/20/gnl-quebec-poilievre-convince-quebecers/amp/
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a news conference in Delta B.C., on Thursday, Jan.16, 2025. Poilievre has indicated that he doesn't mind if public servants work from home, as long as their work gets done. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Ethan Cairns
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre wants to revive the GNL Quebec liquefied gas project and “believes he can convince Quebecers” of its relevance, even though it was rejected at the time, notably due to a lack of social acceptability.
“The status quo, where we sell 100 per cent of our natural gas to the United States to benefit Donald Trump, has no social acceptability,” the Conservative leader declared during a press scrum Thursday in Jonquière, in Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean.
In 2021, Quebec refused to authorize the Saguenay pipeline and GNL terminal project to export Albertan natural gas. Ottawa did the same in 2022.
Advertisement
However, the U.S. tariffs have led to a change of tone on this side of the border. Quebec and Ottawa recently reopened the door to the project.
“GNL Québec could be the cleanest natural gas liquefaction plant in the world. Why? Because it will be powered by zero-emission hydroelectricity,” added the Conservative leader.
In April 2021, the report from the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement (BAPE) clearly stated there was no social acceptability in the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region and that the project had not demonstrated its relevance.
The plant’s objective was to export 11 million tonnes of natural gas from Western Canada to Europe and Asia by sea each year for a period of 25 to 50 years. A 780-kilometre-long gas pipeline was also to be built by Gazoduq to transport the gas from Ontario to the Saguenay region.
‘Canadian build-ready zones’
Poilievre was also in the region to announce that if elected premier, he intends to accelerate energy projects like GNL Québec. To do this, he wants to designate areas as “Canadian build-ready zones.”
Advertisement
These would effectively be “pre-approved and pre-authorized zones” for the construction of projects such as mines, data centres, power plants, and GNL liquefaction plants. The goal, among other things, is to speed up the granting of permits to allow companies to build more quickly.
The Conservative leader indicated he intended to work with the Quebec government to grant this designation to Saguenay to accelerate the liquefied natural gas plant project.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a news conference in Delta B.C., on Thursday, Jan.16, 2025. Poilievre has indicated that he doesn't mind if public servants work from home, as long as their work gets done. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Ethan Cairns
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre wants to revive the GNL Quebec liquefied gas project and “believes he can convince Quebecers” of its relevance, even though it was rejected at the time, notably due to a lack of social acceptability.
“The status quo, where we sell 100 per cent of our natural gas to the United States to benefit Donald Trump, has no social acceptability,” the Conservative leader declared during a press scrum Thursday in Jonquière, in Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean.
In 2021, Quebec refused to authorize the Saguenay pipeline and GNL terminal project to export Albertan natural gas. Ottawa did the same in 2022.
Advertisement
However, the U.S. tariffs have led to a change of tone on this side of the border. Quebec and Ottawa recently reopened the door to the project.
“GNL Québec could be the cleanest natural gas liquefaction plant in the world. Why? Because it will be powered by zero-emission hydroelectricity,” added the Conservative leader.
In April 2021, the report from the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement (BAPE) clearly stated there was no social acceptability in the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region and that the project had not demonstrated its relevance.
The plant’s objective was to export 11 million tonnes of natural gas from Western Canada to Europe and Asia by sea each year for a period of 25 to 50 years. A 780-kilometre-long gas pipeline was also to be built by Gazoduq to transport the gas from Ontario to the Saguenay region.
‘Canadian build-ready zones’
Poilievre was also in the region to announce that if elected premier, he intends to accelerate energy projects like GNL Québec. To do this, he wants to designate areas as “Canadian build-ready zones.”
Advertisement
These would effectively be “pre-approved and pre-authorized zones” for the construction of projects such as mines, data centres, power plants, and GNL liquefaction plants. The goal, among other things, is to speed up the granting of permits to allow companies to build more quickly.
The Conservative leader indicated he intended to work with the Quebec government to grant this designation to Saguenay to accelerate the liquefied natural gas plant project.
Forsiktig
20.03.2025 kl 20:22
7561
Når jeg gikk inn for første gang for ca. 4 år siden, var kursen 1,13. Husker han SteveX typen hamret løs flere ganger om dagen i forumet om at emisjonen var nær, Binnon var en svindler, og alt var over for Qec. At den har doblet seg sakte men sikkert over ca. 4 år er en "fin utvikling". Men håper på mer så klart.
OSEBX
20.03.2025 kl 15:30
7779
Er det ikke nuläget vi aksjeeiere er opptatt av? Eller hvilket perspektiv har du på ditt aksjeliv?
Redigert 20.03.2025 kl 15:45
Du må logge inn for å svare
OPC1000
20.03.2025 kl 15:09
7843
Man kan med de aller fleste aksjer plukke ut et tidsintervall med en «fin utvikling».
OSEBX
20.03.2025 kl 14:43
7880
Månemannen2 skrev Utvikling? Hvor ser du dette?
Aksjen er opp 21,5 % de siste 3 måneder, er ikke det en fin utvikling, så forstår ikke jeg??
Redigert 20.03.2025 kl 15:00
Du må logge inn for å svare
RGTBJØRN
20.03.2025 kl 14:01
15527
Nydelig utvikling, som jeg skrev step for step betyr at en god nyhet etterfølges av flere, lett å gjøre den feilen å hoppe av et tog ved første stoppested. Toget går som regel videre. Nærmer oss april så dette blir spennede ....
fjellape
20.03.2025 kl 00:11
16192
Det som kan få makroøknomisk betydning, er Peak Oil for skifer i USA.
Oljeproduksjon fra skifer, skalerte fort og høyt opp i løpet av få år. Det er spådommer om at den vil nå toppen i løpet av de nærmeste åra, og etterhvert kan den gå fort nedover.
Oljeproduksjonen i USA er faktisk svært stor, men den kan fort gå nedover.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvxA5gi-fuM
https://peakprosperity.com/the-return-of-peak-oil-why-it-matters-and-whats-next/
Oljeproduksjon fra skifer, skalerte fort og høyt opp i løpet av få år. Det er spådommer om at den vil nå toppen i løpet av de nærmeste åra, og etterhvert kan den gå fort nedover.
Oljeproduksjonen i USA er faktisk svært stor, men den kan fort gå nedover.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvxA5gi-fuM
https://peakprosperity.com/the-return-of-peak-oil-why-it-matters-and-whats-next/
fjellape
19.03.2025 kl 23:59
16187
Fikk opp sida i Firefox:
Install the User-Agent Switcher extension: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/uaswitcher/
Deretter klikka jeg på Extensions oppe til høyre, og valgte en annen brukeragent. F.eks Firefox for Android eller Edge for Windows.
Install the User-Agent Switcher extension: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/uaswitcher/
Deretter klikka jeg på Extensions oppe til høyre, og valgte en annen brukeragent. F.eks Firefox for Android eller Edge for Windows.
Redigert 20.03.2025 kl 00:03
Du må logge inn for å svare
njn-
19.03.2025 kl 22:20
16478
Problemet er med Firefox 136.0.2
Det virker ok med Edge.
Har dessverre en forkjærlighet til Mozilla, som jeg har brukt fra starten av.
Må muligens krype til korset.
Det virker ok med Edge.
Har dessverre en forkjærlighet til Mozilla, som jeg har brukt fra starten av.
Må muligens krype til korset.
uptrade
19.03.2025 kl 20:00
17063
Fra shareville:
https://calgaryherald.com/business/declare-a-energy-crisis-and-approve-major-projects-within-six-months-says-canadas-oil-and-gas-leaders
Edit:
Nå har "MDG" begynt å bry seg om den pågående handelskrigen..
Nervøse for hva regjeringen rasler med i kulissene?
https://environmentaldefence.ca/2025/03/19/statement-oil-and-gas-companies-want-to-gut-canadas-hard-fought-climate-progress/
https://calgaryherald.com/business/declare-a-energy-crisis-and-approve-major-projects-within-six-months-says-canadas-oil-and-gas-leaders
Edit:
Nå har "MDG" begynt å bry seg om den pågående handelskrigen..
Nervøse for hva regjeringen rasler med i kulissene?
https://environmentaldefence.ca/2025/03/19/statement-oil-and-gas-companies-want-to-gut-canadas-hard-fought-climate-progress/
Redigert 19.03.2025 kl 20:06
Du må logge inn for å svare
sigj2
19.03.2025 kl 19:49
17118
Ok,mulig det kommer ei drittpakke fra den kanten da......ingenting å bry seg om da 😁
minsin
19.03.2025 kl 18:41
17330
Vet ikke hva han sier...og har forsåvidt ikke interresse av det heller.
I mine øyne er mannen ett avskum , og jeg synes synd på de som er opptatt av "investornytt"
Det jeg antar er at QEC har gjordt en bakgrunnsjekk av mister teigland , og de stiller de naturligvis ikke til intervju..
Det naturlige er nå at Teigland blir sur, for så å anbefale salg av aksjen...uten at det vil ha nevneverdig å si for kursen
I mine øyne er mannen ett avskum , og jeg synes synd på de som er opptatt av "investornytt"
Det jeg antar er at QEC har gjordt en bakgrunnsjekk av mister teigland , og de stiller de naturligvis ikke til intervju..
Det naturlige er nå at Teigland blir sur, for så å anbefale salg av aksjen...uten at det vil ha nevneverdig å si for kursen
Viti
19.03.2025 kl 18:34
17347
Linken fungerer her, har prøvd den. Prøv og kopier den og lim den inn i nettleseren
tuja
19.03.2025 kl 17:44
17560
njn
Det er samme artikkel som jeg la ut 11.29 i dag. Der ligger hele artikkelen ute.
Det er samme artikkel som jeg la ut 11.29 i dag. Der ligger hele artikkelen ute.
Storms
19.03.2025 kl 13:37
18108
Ja valget i år har den største betydning for fremtidige gas og olie energisikkerhedsprojekter år frem…
“Realiteten er imidlertid at den føderale regjeringen ikke trenger noen spesiell lisens for å bygge olje- og gassinfrastruktur som krysser provinsgrenser.
I henhold til grunnloven er det bare det føderale parlamentet som har jurisdiksjon over nasjonale rørlednings- og energiprosjekter.
Til tross for denne myndigheten har ingen føderal regjering vært villig til å påtvinge en provins et slikt prosjekt. Quebecs historie med å motstå føderal intervensjon gjør dette til en politisk ømfintlig sak. Det er også en bredere valgbetraktning: Selv om det er mulig å danne en føderal regjering uten å vinne Quebec, gjør dens mange seter det til en avgjørende kampplass.
I et tospråklig land har en regjering som hevder å snakke for alle kanadiere fordel av å ha en tilstedeværelse i Quebec.
Ottawa kan påtvinge en nasjonal rørledning, men det trenger det ikke.
Nye meningsmålingsdata fra Quebec og over hele Canada tyder på at kanadiere i økende grad støtter prosjekter som forbedrer energisikkerheten og reduserer avhengigheten av USA.
Den føderale regjeringen må slutte å snakke bare til politikere – spesielt i Quebec – og ta saken direkte til folket.
Med et føderalt valg i horisonten, bør politikere fra alle partier sette nasjonale rørledninger og naturgassprosjekter på stemmeseddelen”
“Realiteten er imidlertid at den føderale regjeringen ikke trenger noen spesiell lisens for å bygge olje- og gassinfrastruktur som krysser provinsgrenser.
I henhold til grunnloven er det bare det føderale parlamentet som har jurisdiksjon over nasjonale rørlednings- og energiprosjekter.
Til tross for denne myndigheten har ingen føderal regjering vært villig til å påtvinge en provins et slikt prosjekt. Quebecs historie med å motstå føderal intervensjon gjør dette til en politisk ømfintlig sak. Det er også en bredere valgbetraktning: Selv om det er mulig å danne en føderal regjering uten å vinne Quebec, gjør dens mange seter det til en avgjørende kampplass.
I et tospråklig land har en regjering som hevder å snakke for alle kanadiere fordel av å ha en tilstedeværelse i Quebec.
Ottawa kan påtvinge en nasjonal rørledning, men det trenger det ikke.
Nye meningsmålingsdata fra Quebec og over hele Canada tyder på at kanadiere i økende grad støtter prosjekter som forbedrer energisikkerheten og reduserer avhengigheten av USA.
Den føderale regjeringen må slutte å snakke bare til politikere – spesielt i Quebec – og ta saken direkte til folket.
Med et føderalt valg i horisonten, bør politikere fra alle partier sette nasjonale rørledninger og naturgassprosjekter på stemmeseddelen”
Redigert 19.03.2025 kl 13:39
Du må logge inn for å svare
Storms
19.03.2025 kl 12:02
18466
Canadas nye premierminister Mark Carney besøger Europa for at sikker sig fællesskabssikkerhedsaftaler m.fl.(emner og strategier fastlægges).
Herefter kommer tingene til at ske hurtigt i Canada, tror jeg…
Herefter kommer tingene til at ske hurtigt i Canada, tror jeg…
Redigert 19.03.2025 kl 12:03
Du må logge inn for å svare
sigj2
19.03.2025 kl 11:41
18598
Det kommer til å gå opp mot 3kr jevnt å trutt fremover uansett om dere liker det eller ikke.
Det blir dobling av prodden åkke som.👌
Det blir dobling av prodden åkke som.👌
Viti
19.03.2025 kl 11:29
18625
"Støtte til nasjonale rørledninger og LNG-prosjekter får fart, selv i Quebec"
https://troymedia.com/viewpoint/pipelines-have-public-support-as-a-path-to-energy-security/
https://troymedia.com/viewpoint/pipelines-have-public-support-as-a-path-to-energy-security/
tuja
19.03.2025 kl 11:29
18640
Pipelines have public support as a path to energy security
By Joseph Quesnel | Mar 18, 2025
Reading Time: 3 minutes
Support for national pipelines and LNG projects gain momentum, even in Quebec
The ongoing threats posed by U.S. tariffs on the Canadian economy have caused many Canadians to reconsider the need for national oil pipelines and other major resource projects.
The United States is Canada’s most significant trading partner, and the two countries have enjoyed over a century of peaceful commerce and good relations. However, the onset of tariffs and increasingly hostile rhetoric has made Canadians realize they should not be taking these good relations for granted.
Traditional opposition to energy development has given way to a renewed focus on energy security and domestic self-reliance. Over the last decade, Canadian energy producers have sought to build pipelines to move oil from landlocked Alberta to tidewater, aiming to reduce reliance on U.S. markets and expand exports internationally. Canada’s dependence on the U.S. for energy exports has long affected the prices it can obtain.
Public opinion on pipelines has shifted. Will Ottawa seize the moment for energy security or let politics stall progress?
With an election on the horizon, politicians of all parties should put pipelines and natural gas projects on the ballot.
One province where this shift is becoming evident is Quebec. Historically, Quebec politicians and environmental interests have vehemently opposed oil and gas development. With an abundance of hydroelectric power, imported oil and gas, and little fossil fuel production, the province has had fewer economic incentives to support the industry.
However, recent polling suggests attitudes are changing. A SOM-La Presse poll from late February found that about 60 per cent of Quebec residents support reviving the Energy East pipeline project, while 61 per cent favour restarting the GNL Quebec natural gas pipeline project, a proposed LNG facility near Saguenay that would export liquefied natural gas to global markets. While support for these projects remains stronger in other parts of the country, this represents a substantial shift in Quebec.
Yet, despite this change, Quebec politicians at both the provincial and federal levels remain out of step with public opinion. The Montreal Economic Institute, a non-partisan think tank, has documented this disconnect for years. There are two key reasons for it: Quebec politicians tend to reflect the perspectives of a Montreal-based Laurentian elite rather than broader provincial sentiment, and entrenched interests such as Hydro-Québec benefit from limiting competition under the guise of environmental concerns.
Not only have Quebec politicians misrepresented public opinion, but they have also claimed to speak for the entire province on energy issues. Premier François Legault and Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet have argued that pipeline projects lack “social licence” from Quebecers.
However, the reality is that the federal government does not need any special licence to build oil and gas infrastructure that crosses provincial borders. Under the Constitution, only the federal Parliament has jurisdiction over national pipeline and energy projects.
Despite this authority, no federal government has been willing to impose such a project on a province. Quebec’s history of resisting federal intervention makes this a politically delicate issue. There is also a broader electoral consideration: while it is possible to form a federal government without winning Quebec, its many seats make it a crucial battleground. In a bilingual country, a government that claims to speak for all Canadians benefits from having a presence in Quebec.
Ottawa could impose a national pipeline, but it doesn’t have to. New polling data from Quebec and across Canada suggest Canadians increasingly support projects that enhance energy security and reduce reliance on the United States. The federal government needs to stop speaking only to politicians—especially in Quebec—and take its case directly to the people.
With a federal election on the horizon, politicians of all parties should put national pipelines and natural gas projects on the ballot.
Joseph Quesnel is a senior research fellow with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.
By Joseph Quesnel | Mar 18, 2025
Reading Time: 3 minutes
Support for national pipelines and LNG projects gain momentum, even in Quebec
The ongoing threats posed by U.S. tariffs on the Canadian economy have caused many Canadians to reconsider the need for national oil pipelines and other major resource projects.
The United States is Canada’s most significant trading partner, and the two countries have enjoyed over a century of peaceful commerce and good relations. However, the onset of tariffs and increasingly hostile rhetoric has made Canadians realize they should not be taking these good relations for granted.
Traditional opposition to energy development has given way to a renewed focus on energy security and domestic self-reliance. Over the last decade, Canadian energy producers have sought to build pipelines to move oil from landlocked Alberta to tidewater, aiming to reduce reliance on U.S. markets and expand exports internationally. Canada’s dependence on the U.S. for energy exports has long affected the prices it can obtain.
Public opinion on pipelines has shifted. Will Ottawa seize the moment for energy security or let politics stall progress?
With an election on the horizon, politicians of all parties should put pipelines and natural gas projects on the ballot.
One province where this shift is becoming evident is Quebec. Historically, Quebec politicians and environmental interests have vehemently opposed oil and gas development. With an abundance of hydroelectric power, imported oil and gas, and little fossil fuel production, the province has had fewer economic incentives to support the industry.
However, recent polling suggests attitudes are changing. A SOM-La Presse poll from late February found that about 60 per cent of Quebec residents support reviving the Energy East pipeline project, while 61 per cent favour restarting the GNL Quebec natural gas pipeline project, a proposed LNG facility near Saguenay that would export liquefied natural gas to global markets. While support for these projects remains stronger in other parts of the country, this represents a substantial shift in Quebec.
Yet, despite this change, Quebec politicians at both the provincial and federal levels remain out of step with public opinion. The Montreal Economic Institute, a non-partisan think tank, has documented this disconnect for years. There are two key reasons for it: Quebec politicians tend to reflect the perspectives of a Montreal-based Laurentian elite rather than broader provincial sentiment, and entrenched interests such as Hydro-Québec benefit from limiting competition under the guise of environmental concerns.
Not only have Quebec politicians misrepresented public opinion, but they have also claimed to speak for the entire province on energy issues. Premier François Legault and Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet have argued that pipeline projects lack “social licence” from Quebecers.
However, the reality is that the federal government does not need any special licence to build oil and gas infrastructure that crosses provincial borders. Under the Constitution, only the federal Parliament has jurisdiction over national pipeline and energy projects.
Despite this authority, no federal government has been willing to impose such a project on a province. Quebec’s history of resisting federal intervention makes this a politically delicate issue. There is also a broader electoral consideration: while it is possible to form a federal government without winning Quebec, its many seats make it a crucial battleground. In a bilingual country, a government that claims to speak for all Canadians benefits from having a presence in Quebec.
Ottawa could impose a national pipeline, but it doesn’t have to. New polling data from Quebec and across Canada suggest Canadians increasingly support projects that enhance energy security and reduce reliance on the United States. The federal government needs to stop speaking only to politicians—especially in Quebec—and take its case directly to the people.
With a federal election on the horizon, politicians of all parties should put national pipelines and natural gas projects on the ballot.
Joseph Quesnel is a senior research fellow with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.
uptrade
19.03.2025 kl 02:11
19199
Hva sa Teigland om at det ikke ble noe intervju?
Noen begrunnelse til det?
Regner med du fikk svar på det av han?
Noen begrunnelse til det?
Regner med du fikk svar på det av han?
minsin
18.03.2025 kl 22:59
19440
Hmm ja investornytt v/ teigland fikk ikke sitt intervju med QEC - som jeg antok
Investornytt 09.03.25 Ukens aksje – 25-30% bør denne aksjen klare!
Tipper QEC fannt ut at Teigland var en høyst tvilsom kar , som flere ganger har vært i finanstilsynes søkelys.
Ikke mange seriøse selskapet som lar seg intervjue av "ei finans-rotta"
https://www.finansavisen.no/tema/espen_teigland
Investornytt 09.03.25 Ukens aksje – 25-30% bør denne aksjen klare!
Tipper QEC fannt ut at Teigland var en høyst tvilsom kar , som flere ganger har vært i finanstilsynes søkelys.
Ikke mange seriøse selskapet som lar seg intervjue av "ei finans-rotta"
https://www.finansavisen.no/tema/espen_teigland
uptrade
18.03.2025 kl 09:23
20082
Fra Shareville:
Punkt 4 i Canada first plan: «Scrap the anti liberal energy law c-69 and greenlight LNG plants, pipelines, mines, factories and port expansions to get more of Canadas goods to more customers of overseas markets»
---
Egne ord: Får håpe CAQ kopierer valgløftet til "Canada First: 😅
Edit:
Legger ved linken til de konservative partiet og valgløfter deres.
https://www.conservative.ca/cpc/canada-first/
Punkt 4 i Canada first plan: «Scrap the anti liberal energy law c-69 and greenlight LNG plants, pipelines, mines, factories and port expansions to get more of Canadas goods to more customers of overseas markets»
---
Egne ord: Får håpe CAQ kopierer valgløftet til "Canada First: 😅
Edit:
Legger ved linken til de konservative partiet og valgløfter deres.
https://www.conservative.ca/cpc/canada-first/
Redigert 18.03.2025 kl 09:57
Du må logge inn for å svare
njn-
18.03.2025 kl 01:20
20713
Det kommer en brikke idag! Vi må bare vente på utfallet.
https://www.ledevoir.com/politique/quebec/855223/importantes-consultations-energie-quebec-amorceront-semaine-prochaine
https://www.ledevoir.com/politique/quebec/855223/importantes-consultations-energie-quebec-amorceront-semaine-prochaine
RGTBJØRN
17.03.2025 kl 23:34
20874
Har en sterk følelse at brikkene faller på plass en for en med dominoeffekt. Vi ser at det brygger seg opp til utbrudd fra kilen som startet i 2008 og antagelig bryter ut nå innen måneder fremover i tid. Ganske sikker på at dette året blir minnerik.
risksøker
17.03.2025 kl 16:06
21577
The threat of tariffs and lingering economic volatility has prompted the Quebec government to reconsider a pipeline project bringing natural gas from Western Canada to the province before liquefying it and shipping it overseas.
Quebec nixed the project, known as LNG-Québec, in 2021, for environmental reasons. But now, with economic uncertainty surrounding the province's relationship with the U.S., its largest trading partner, Quebec's environment minister said the government is interested in taking another look at it.
"We're not opposed to energy projects that respect the environmental criteria," Benoit Charette, the environment minister, told reporters at the National Assembly on Wednesday.
Det er bevegelse.
Quebec nixed the project, known as LNG-Québec, in 2021, for environmental reasons. But now, with economic uncertainty surrounding the province's relationship with the U.S., its largest trading partner, Quebec's environment minister said the government is interested in taking another look at it.
"We're not opposed to energy projects that respect the environmental criteria," Benoit Charette, the environment minister, told reporters at the National Assembly on Wednesday.
Det er bevegelse.
risksøker
17.03.2025 kl 16:06
21268
The threat of tariffs and lingering economic volatility has prompted the Quebec government to reconsider a pipeline project bringing natural gas from Western Canada to the province before liquefying it and shipping it overseas.
Quebec nixed the project, known as LNG-Québec, in 2021, for environmental reasons. But now, with economic uncertainty surrounding the province's relationship with the U.S., its largest trading partner, Quebec's environment minister said the government is interested in taking another look at it.
"We're not opposed to energy projects that respect the environmental criteria," Benoit Charette, the environment minister, told reporters at the National Assembly on Wednesday.
Det er bevegelse.
Quebec nixed the project, known as LNG-Québec, in 2021, for environmental reasons. But now, with economic uncertainty surrounding the province's relationship with the U.S., its largest trading partner, Quebec's environment minister said the government is interested in taking another look at it.
"We're not opposed to energy projects that respect the environmental criteria," Benoit Charette, the environment minister, told reporters at the National Assembly on Wednesday.
Det er bevegelse.
Storms
17.03.2025 kl 15:58
21286
MB sagde at 1 af disse nye brønde som er på vej er en testbrønd med længere pad(dybte) som giver større udbytte.
Om denne bliver en succes vil QEC bruge denne brøndtype som standart fremover og derned også større udbytte.
Venter på test resultat af denne brønd, vigtig data…
Om denne bliver en succes vil QEC bruge denne brøndtype som standart fremover og derned også større udbytte.
Venter på test resultat af denne brønd, vigtig data…
Redigert 17.03.2025 kl 15:58
Du må logge inn for å svare
Forsiktig
17.03.2025 kl 15:47
21323
Jeg leste et sted i en Qec rapport, eller var det Binnon som har sagt det på et møte? Angående de nyeste brønnene så er meningen at produksjonen på noen av dem, kan forventes å produsere opp mot 20 tusen fat per dag, over tid. Husker ikke nøyaktig, men er 100% sikker at jeg leste fra Qec om at produksjonen kan forventes over de neste årene å stige betraktelig mer enn i dag - da pga noen av de nyeste brønnene som nå blir koblet på kan potensielt ha en mye større kapasitet enn tidligere brønner.
Peter Sellers
17.03.2025 kl 13:36
21523
@Iv, ja du har ett poeng og det er decline som vi har og har hatt til en hver tid, så ja her må det bores nye brønner hele tiden ellers vil vi ikke få det ønskede løftet i produksjonen!!