Se sidan 5 i denna studie mellan en bil med bara batteri, eller en med fuelcell;

http://www.metricmind.com/data/bevs_vs_fcvs.pdf

Batteribilen, där du får 79 kW från vindkraft, så er det igen 60 kw på axeln.

Fuelcell-bil, där du har 202 kW från vindkraft så har du igen 60 kW på axeln.

Du tapper alltså 2 ggr mer i en fuelcell-bil!

We find that government studies indicate that it would be far cheaper, in terms of production and refueling costs, to develop a BEV, even if we do not consider the substantial cost of building and maintaining the hydrogen infrastructure on which the FCV would depend.

Kort sagt, innan någon ens börjat betala för hydrogenstationerna, så er vätgasen en förlorare.

Vidare,

The FCV propulsion system weighs 43% more, consumes nearly three-times more space onboard the vehicle for the same power output, and costs approximately 46% more than the BEV system. Further, the refueling cost of a FCV is nearly threetimes greater. Finally, when we relax the
renewable energy assumption, the BEV is still more efficient, cleaner, and vastly less expensive in terms of manufacturing, refueling, and infrastructure investment.

Använd gärna detta material som beslutning om det er klokt at eie og investere i nel-aksjen.

Studien er skriven på det inom Automotive högt anerkente universitetet Arizona State University-East.

Hvis dere har spörsmål så er jeg behjelplig.