"Where did the towers go? By Dr. Judy Wood. This book puts the power of KNOWING THE TRUTH in everybody's hands. It rips the imposed veil of fear and confusion about that fateful day to shreds. It also teaches the reader how to DECIPHER data in today's DIS-information age. I consider it a 'self study textbook' that should be a part of everyone's required reading in order to live conscisously in a post nine eleven world. Because, as Dr. Wood says, nine eleven was an attack on HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS"

Boka kan kjøpes her: https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0615412564/
Eller her: https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/product/where-did-the-towers-go-by-dr-judy-wood/

"If you are among those who have called for a new, open, and independent investigation, today’s your lucky day! This is not only “The New Investigation,” it is the only comprehensive-forensic investigation to date in the public domain. As of this publication only one person —myself, Dr. Judy Wood— has conducted a comprehensive investigation to determine what happened to the World Trade Center (WTC) complex. This was part of the federal qui tam (whistleblower) case I filed (2007) in which I accused the defendants of science fraud.

This book is a summary of the physical evidence submitted in my federal qui tam case accusing the defendants of science fraud. NIST was mandated by congress to “Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed…” yet NIST admitted to me that they did not analyze the “collapse.” The contractors they hired with taxpayer money knowingly allowed the fraudulent report to become final.

Sadly, this case had no support from the “Truth movement,” leaving the judges free to ignore the law in order to dismiss the case (which they acknowledged they did) so they could sweep it under the carpet. Had this case been allowed to move forward, the defendants (whose expertise is energy weapons) would have been put under oath (equivalent to subpoena power).

This book contains physical evidence, not theories or speculation, but physical evidence that is overwhelming and conclusive as to what happened. But for the record, I do not believe that our government isresponsible for executing the events of 9/11/01; nor do I believe that our government is not responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01.

This is not a case of belief. This is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine

1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).

Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.

Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.

My own research is not speculation. It is a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01. I don’t address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now. Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.

By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind. The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to my research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.

Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda. The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court. Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.

What is presented in this book is not a theory and it is not speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened.

If you listen to the evidence carefully enough, it will speak to you and tell you exactly what happened.
If you don’t know what happened, keep listening to the evidence until you do.
The evidence always tells the truth.
The key is not to allow yourself to be distracted away from seeing what the evidence is telling you."

QUIET QUIET QUIET - NO explosions heard at building 7's demise - contrary to the false "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth" narrative:

"Ocean Tower and WTC 7 Comparison"
"If you consider the idea that WTC 7 (47 Stories) underwent controlled demolition on 911... What's missing from the 2nd video clip?"
Redigert 12.09.2019 kl 20:59 Du må logge inn for å svare

Yes, Nikola Tesla's technology is for real.

✈️#911Truth Part 14: Building 7 Turning to Dust for Over 7 Hours (Fast Forward 45X Speed):

( Del av en spilleliste av Math Easy Solutions:
✈️#911Truth Video Tutorial Series https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLai3U8-WIK0EzqTamtIXtgX8QudQSxuxh )


"Math Easy Solutions
23.8K subscribers
In #911Truth Part 14 I have compiled together in chronological order what may very well be the most complete picture of what actually happened to Building 7: which is it got turned to dust gradually from inside out for 7 hours before falling like a hollowed out shell. World Trade Center 7 (also referred to as WTC 7, Salomon Brothers building, or “Building 7”) has been far too often used erroneously (intentionally and unintentionally) as “proof” of conventional controlled demolition; and often by only showing the few seconds where it falls down (albeit extremely quietly leaving very little rubble or seismic impact or projectiles as would be expected from anything conventional). But removing all mainstream and “mainstream alternative” narratives aside, our eyes show us exactly what happened…

I have stitched together 8 videos and sped up the majority at 45X speed to give a complete and concise view of Building 7 turn into dust, much like the rest of World Trade Center complex (which consisted of 7 buildings in total including the Twin Towers WTC 1 and 2). A full description and screenshots of the main events in each video is shown in the accompanying Steemit post: https://steemit.com/history/@mes/911t...

The original videos with sound are shown in the following “EnhancedWTCVideos” YouTube channel, and which obtains the videos from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from the National Institute of (coverup) Science and (coverup) Technology (NIST). They are listed below along with the timestamps."
Redigert 14.09.2019 kl 20:52 Du må logge inn for å svare

J O H N _ H U T C H I S O N

"John Hutchison's life changed drastically in 1979 when, upon starting up an array of high-voltage equipment, he felt something hit his shoulder. He threw the piece of metal back to where it seemed to have originated, and it flew up and hit him again. This was how he originally discovered fundamental frequencies can shield gravity.
John Hutchison is one of the formost Nikola Tesla experts alive today. He has replicated many of Nikola Tesla's works over the years, including the Death Ray, and a smaller Philadelphia Experiment.
When John's Tesla coils, electrostatic generator, and other equipment created a complex electromagnetic field, heavy pieces of metal levitated and shot toward the ceiling, and some pieces shredded. Upon analysis and thorough investigation, the Canadian government dubbed this phenomenon the Hutchison-Effect."

John Hutchison og 9/11
The Hutchison Effect and 9/11 – An Ace in the Hole?

The Hutchison Effect and Ace Baker's Attempt to reproduce it (or attempt to convince others he can)

Hutchison Effect Samples in MFMP hands
"A huge thank you to John Hutchison for selecting and shipping such an interesting array of samples created by his effect that employs RF and static electric field interference plus magnetism."
Redigert 21.09.2019 kl 01:01 Du må logge inn for å svare

Dr Judy Wood 9/11 'Where Did The Towers Go' Presentation Interview

Jason Liosatos Outside The Box 13.7K subscribers
3,736 views • Published on 19 Sep 2019
"My guest Dr Judy Wood author of 'Where Did The Towers Go' presents her investigation into what really happened on 9/11 to the Twin Towers and Building 7 when they turned to dust."

Fra kommentarfeltet:
oldflute 8 hours ago (edited)
"The 'bathtub wall' shown at 54:40 now forms one side of the 9/11 memorial. What if the steel in the rebar of the reinforced concrete of the bathtub wall was damaged by the field effects of the directed energy weaponry? Will the wall eventually give way? Time will tell.

Why do I ask?

Because we know that the steel of the remnants of the seven WTC buildings and of the adjacent Banker's Trust building was severely damaged by the directed energy fields and continued to deteriorate over the next few years. The Banker's Trust building finally had to be deconstructed because it continued to fill with irritating dust. The dust was so damaging that it even caused failure of the sealed bearings of the exhaust fans they set up to clear the dust. We know that the 9/11 'stench' never left the area around the WTC site until the last of the steel of the Banker's Trust was hauled away (both are first hand observations related to me by a doctoral level scientist who lived half a block away the entire time). "

oldflute 11 hours ago (edited)
" At 40:00, 'lack of debris.' Confirmed by the sworn affidavit of first responder Sgt. James Canham, who had looked up as the south tower started to rumble, then ran, was engulfed, and later in the day returned to the area to see first hand how he could help in the rescue. Sgt. Canham said, 'This changed all the rules. This changed all the rules. This went from a structure to a wafer in seconds. In seconds.' "

- Ani Poladian 2 days ago
"Do the Architect and Engineers for 911 organization know this information? "

-- SON of Overbook. 1 day ago (edited)
"Of course they do. That’s why she left the organization ,because she was smart enough to distance herself from these sick people who run the disinformation campaign."

-- Ani Poladian 1 day ago
"@SON of Overbook. I may not have communicated properly..the architect and engineers that have worked diligently to investigate 9/11 are not appointed by the government. These are 3200 architects and engineers that voluntarily came together because they knew the official report was BS! ae911truth.org is the website. Take a look"

-- SON of Overbook. 1 day ago
"Ani Poladian I understand your question, and still am telling you that Dr. Wood was working with Jim Fetzer was the one who threatened her and she left shortly after Jim & Steve Jones had a fake falling out. Richard Gauge describes Dr. Woods work as 'witchcraft'. Please go to checktheevidence.com . All official 9/11 groups are in on the coverup my friend."

-- Ani Poladian 1 day ago
"@SON of Overbook. Thank you I will check it out! The researching never ends does it? You might be interested in David Ickes new book called The Trigger. I have followed David for years and believe in his honesty and carefully vetted work. Check out the interview on Youtube Jason Liasotos channel with David Icke on The Trigger! Very revealing in so many ways"

-- Isobel31Swan 1 day ago
"Yes. They are Gatekeepers. The so-called '9/11 Truthers' are collection agencies; while they consist of sincere people, the group is infiltrated with people to steer them in the wrong direction. Don't trust Steven E Jones, Jim Felzer, and Richard Gage et al. As Dr. Wood said, '9/11 was an horrendous plan; do you think they forgot to plan a cover up?'. "

-- Isobel31Swan 1 day ago
"@Ani Poladian I wouldn't trust Icke either, watch Richard D Hall's and Andrew Johnson's assessment on him. https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=231&part=1&gen=3 "

What inspired the writers (the planners) of the "9/11 official story" ? The script(s) were quite imaginative indeed.

Here is an early take that didn't make it into the final script.

This is from "Flash Gordon conquers the universe" (1940):

As a sidenote: George Lucas got the inspiration to the Star Wars saga from these serials!
Redigert 29.09.2019 kl 22:59 Du må logge inn for å svare

J O H N _ H U T C H I S O N

I disse TV intervjuene forteller Hutchison om sitt liv og om hans interesse for Nikola Tesla's teknologi. Hans leilighet i 3 etasje i en boligblokk i Canada var tettpakket med elektronisk utstyr for å drive med bl.a. antigravitasjons eksperimenter. Hvordan TV og filmprodusenter oppsøkte han for å filme dette, og hvordan han jobbet i hemmelige prosjekter, og mye annet.
Han er IKKE den typiske 'akademiker'. Han arbeider ut fra instinkt og intuitiv innsikt.

Hutchison Effect - John Hutchison Interview with Elaine Smitha (1 of 2) (1994)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNhqu7o3uc8 58 min.

Hutchison Effect - John Hutchison Interview with Elaine Smitha (2 of 2) (2000)