But do they need Polysilicon?

Yes, this is what I was trying to find out. They use obviously so called thin film (made of poly-si also?) technology in their modules. This might even be bad news for REC as disruptive technology, not so sure anymore. That is prolly why the REC share was dropping like a stone today?

A good page on the topic:
https://news.energysage.com/thin-film-solar-panels-make-sense/

And a good comparison page: Thin Film vs. Crystalline Silicon PV Modules
https://www.civicsolar.com/support/installer/articles/thin-film-vs-crystalline-silicon-pv-modules

Looks like thin film tech is not so disruptive after all, it has been around as alternative for decades

Funny, now I see why that twisted AB was avoiding the topic today. He has probably sold all his REC shares already!

@michael

???

Dramaqueen? You are contradicting yourself in every sentence. Search for info first, then use logic.

FirstSolar does not compete with REC. REC is not affected by this news. They have a part of the american market and is growing organically with market growth. No negative net effect can then be observed on polysilicon-based marketshare. Polysilicon has 90 % marketshare because it is a superior technology compared to CdTe. It has not increased efficiency compared to costs.

Nå brukes vel silangass i produksjonen av thin film paneler. Rec lager silangass... Så vet ikke hvem som er "twisted" her, men setter en femmer på at det er Chicago Bulls spilleren.

http://www.recsilicon.com/products/silicon-gases

" But do they need Polysilicon? "

Or SIL Gass? :-)) I think...

First Solar er mer en konkurrent til Scatec enn REC. Konkurransen foreligger på innstallasjon/bygging av parker. Men nå har First Solar hatt en andel av markedet hele tiden og vokser markedet må også First Solar vokse for å ikke miste markedsandeler. First Solar gjør det bra i USA. Men totalt sett driver de med en nisje hvor det primært er to aktører som satser på denne teknologien.

Fremover er det MonoSi som gjelder for high-end.