"Excecutive time" - hva gjør han da?
Chorizo
18.11.2019 kl 20:31
468
https://www.axios.com/donald-trump-private-schedules-leak-executive-time-34e67fbb-3af6-48df-aefb-52e02c334255.html
60% av dagen går med til "excecutive time". Det er da flommene av tweets kommer, men hva ellers gjør han? Ser på FoxNews og spiser ostepop?
60% av dagen går med til "excecutive time". Det er da flommene av tweets kommer, men hva ellers gjør han? Ser på FoxNews og spiser ostepop?
Hva har egentlig jonashadji gjort i det siste?
Trump er verdt lønnen som er <$1 og den er fortjent.
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/08/16/politics/trump-donates-salary-surgeon-general/index.html
(CNN)President Donald Trump donated his second-quarter salary to the Office of the Surgeon General, continuing his practice of donating his salary every quarter to a different part of the federal government.
"I donate 100% of my President's salary, $400,000, back to our Country, and feel very good about it!" Trump tweeted.
Trump er verdt lønnen som er <$1 og den er fortjent.
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/08/16/politics/trump-donates-salary-surgeon-general/index.html
(CNN)President Donald Trump donated his second-quarter salary to the Office of the Surgeon General, continuing his practice of donating his salary every quarter to a different part of the federal government.
"I donate 100% of my President's salary, $400,000, back to our Country, and feel very good about it!" Trump tweeted.
Du har ingenting med hva han gjør,pølsa.Du skjønner ikke en dritt av det hele.Du er syk i hodet.
Ostepop,ja.Du er helt der nede....
Ostepop,ja.Du er helt der nede....
"Du har ingenting med hva han gjør,pølsa.Du skjønner ikke en dritt av det hele.Du er syk i hodet"
Amerikanske velgere har selvsagt rett til å vite om han jobber eller ikke. Jeg tror ikke det er mye. Det går mest i golf, valgkamprally og twitring.
Amerikanske velgere har selvsagt rett til å vite om han jobber eller ikke. Jeg tror ikke det er mye. Det går mest i golf, valgkamprally og twitring.
Fine rally, holy-one golf og tweets som sitter BRA!
Pga popularitet max 2 bill
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/rallies/sunrise-fl-nov-26-2019/
Register for Sunrise, FL
November 26, 2019
You may only register up two (2) tickets per mobile number per event.
All tickets are subject to first come first serve basis.
Pga popularitet max 2 bill
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/rallies/sunrise-fl-nov-26-2019/
Register for Sunrise, FL
November 26, 2019
You may only register up two (2) tickets per mobile number per event.
All tickets are subject to first come first serve basis.
Redigert 18.11.2019 kl 21:48
Du må logge inn for å svare
Zorin
18.11.2019 kl 22:47
424
På sin "Excecutive time" er han president i USA. Dagene hans går hovedsaklig til golf.
Reporter's Notebook: Finding the balance with "executive time"
In this Reporter's Notebook, John Dickerson looks at smoke breaks, coffee breaks and "executive time." It doesn't matter whether you're the president or a school principal. It's wise to take your brain from a sprint to a stroll. But what is the right balance of focus versus free thinking? How do we arrange our minutes at work to reach optimum productivity? We search for those answers.
The president's schedule was leaked this week presumably by somebody who works for him and who doesn't think the president works. It showed vast blocks of "executive time," a period during which the president can do anything he pleases.
For the president's critics, the loose-fitting day suggests he's a loafer.
I asked Dan Pink about this. He's the author of "When: The Scientific Secrets of Perfect Timing." It's a book that can help any of us divide the day productively. He explained there's nothing wrong with "executive time." What's important is what we – and particularly a president – do with our executive time.
A president's job is to lead, more than it is to manage. Those who get this wrong clog up their days with meetings and micromanaging. Because the public misunderstands this, presidents often have to look like they're working to avoid criticism.
But top executives know that free time is important to think about strategy and vision.
A Harvard Business School study found that top CEOs carve out about a quarter of their day for this kind of creative thinking. But other thinking is required, too. Blue sky visions are great and all, but large organizations demand systematic and focused work that is done in those tighter scheduled times.
So we should ask ourselves and our presidents: Are we using the two types of time wisely? Is scheduled time crisp and informative? Is free time generating insights?
Reports from inside the administration suggest structured time is chaotic, and free time – sometimes occupying nearly 60 percent of the day – often coincides with television-inspired tweets.
Pink points us toward President Dwight Eisenhower's quadrant system that he created to help sort priorities. Urgent and important matters require focused time. Important but non-urgent tasks can be handled during executive time. Where we all fall into the bog of woe is when we spend executive time on matters that are urgent but not-important or not-urgent and not important.
That's lost time. Or worse, it's time where fire drills are created that ruin everybody else's day. This is a system that can work for any of us. So, mull it over next time you have some executive time.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-executive-time-reporters-notebook-finding-the-balance-with-executive-time/
In this Reporter's Notebook, John Dickerson looks at smoke breaks, coffee breaks and "executive time." It doesn't matter whether you're the president or a school principal. It's wise to take your brain from a sprint to a stroll. But what is the right balance of focus versus free thinking? How do we arrange our minutes at work to reach optimum productivity? We search for those answers.
The president's schedule was leaked this week presumably by somebody who works for him and who doesn't think the president works. It showed vast blocks of "executive time," a period during which the president can do anything he pleases.
For the president's critics, the loose-fitting day suggests he's a loafer.
I asked Dan Pink about this. He's the author of "When: The Scientific Secrets of Perfect Timing." It's a book that can help any of us divide the day productively. He explained there's nothing wrong with "executive time." What's important is what we – and particularly a president – do with our executive time.
A president's job is to lead, more than it is to manage. Those who get this wrong clog up their days with meetings and micromanaging. Because the public misunderstands this, presidents often have to look like they're working to avoid criticism.
But top executives know that free time is important to think about strategy and vision.
A Harvard Business School study found that top CEOs carve out about a quarter of their day for this kind of creative thinking. But other thinking is required, too. Blue sky visions are great and all, but large organizations demand systematic and focused work that is done in those tighter scheduled times.
So we should ask ourselves and our presidents: Are we using the two types of time wisely? Is scheduled time crisp and informative? Is free time generating insights?
Reports from inside the administration suggest structured time is chaotic, and free time – sometimes occupying nearly 60 percent of the day – often coincides with television-inspired tweets.
Pink points us toward President Dwight Eisenhower's quadrant system that he created to help sort priorities. Urgent and important matters require focused time. Important but non-urgent tasks can be handled during executive time. Where we all fall into the bog of woe is when we spend executive time on matters that are urgent but not-important or not-urgent and not important.
That's lost time. Or worse, it's time where fire drills are created that ruin everybody else's day. This is a system that can work for any of us. So, mull it over next time you have some executive time.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-executive-time-reporters-notebook-finding-the-balance-with-executive-time/
balder72
18.11.2019 kl 23:13
413
Snart skal dere avskyelige Trump hatere få tygge tungen deres i raseri over at Trump vinner 4 nye år. Jeg ser frem til valgnatten når fråden står rundt kjeften deres, da dere innser nederlaget. Glasstaket vil falle ned i hodene på dere nok en gang.
Chorizo
19.11.2019 kl 08:20
374
Det er oss normale du er ute etter, altså? Trump driter du i. Du bare liker at han oppfører seg jævlig?
Winston Smith
19.11.2019 kl 09:23
357
Trump er kompromissløs når han dirigerer USA’s framtid, dette faller PK’ene tungt for brystet, da de helst ønsker seg en kvinnelig president, svart, helst lesbisk og helst med en skavank som f.eks blind, døv og i rullestol.
Bare slik kan man sikre at intelligente «rådgivere» får mulighet til å bestemme, samt at man viser at «eldre sterke rike menn» blir holdt utenfor, og at personer med handikap også har mulighet for «å gå til topps» i dagens multikulturelle likestillingssamfunn, der alle er like mye verdt, der alle blir tvunget til å være «like» på den måten at ingen får lov til å være rike eller ha en fordel fremfor de syke, fattige og «svake».
PK’erne er kun lykkelige når man bestemmer seg for å innføre sovjetstil samfunn der alle liksom skal være like, der alt er «rettferdig».
Hørte nettopp en diskusjon på radio der man diskuterte at man burde sette en stopper for at folk kunne bli milliardærer, fordi dette visstnok var urettferdig.
Bare slik kan man sikre at intelligente «rådgivere» får mulighet til å bestemme, samt at man viser at «eldre sterke rike menn» blir holdt utenfor, og at personer med handikap også har mulighet for «å gå til topps» i dagens multikulturelle likestillingssamfunn, der alle er like mye verdt, der alle blir tvunget til å være «like» på den måten at ingen får lov til å være rike eller ha en fordel fremfor de syke, fattige og «svake».
PK’erne er kun lykkelige når man bestemmer seg for å innføre sovjetstil samfunn der alle liksom skal være like, der alt er «rettferdig».
Hørte nettopp en diskusjon på radio der man diskuterte at man burde sette en stopper for at folk kunne bli milliardærer, fordi dette visstnok var urettferdig.
Redigert 19.11.2019 kl 09:27
Du må logge inn for å svare
Chorizo
19.11.2019 kl 09:34
347
Bra du har oversikten, da :)
Innrømmer at det er en hel del ved den oransje gangsteren og hans fans som jeg sliter med å forstå. Så du har rett.
Innrømmer at det er en hel del ved den oransje gangsteren og hans fans som jeg sliter med å forstå. Så du har rett.
"Trump er kompromissløs når han dirigerer USA’s framtid"
Trump dirigerer ikke USAs fremtid. Han gir blankt faen i hva som skjer etter at han er borte.Det han derimot gjør er å bryte ned etikk og moral for flere tiår fremover.
Forøvrig fornekter ikke russertrollet seg og kommer med den sedvanlige sovjet trusselen sin til tross for at han støtter både Trumps proteksjonisme og har hodet sitt så langt oppe i ræva på KGB offiseren Putin som det er mulig å komme.
Har du skrinlagt Fjordgubben eller skal du bruke begge nickene fremover?
Trump dirigerer ikke USAs fremtid. Han gir blankt faen i hva som skjer etter at han er borte.Det han derimot gjør er å bryte ned etikk og moral for flere tiår fremover.
Forøvrig fornekter ikke russertrollet seg og kommer med den sedvanlige sovjet trusselen sin til tross for at han støtter både Trumps proteksjonisme og har hodet sitt så langt oppe i ræva på KGB offiseren Putin som det er mulig å komme.
Har du skrinlagt Fjordgubben eller skal du bruke begge nickene fremover?
cinet
19.11.2019 kl 11:21
315
"The Dems are the party of hate "
Trump testifying would be a 'trap': Columnist
Fox News contributor and former Reagan White House political director Ed Rollins and Fox News contributor and New York Post columnist Michael Goodwin explain how President Trump is innocent and say 'deep state' actors are the ones who should testify in front of Congress.
Videon er et must for alle DT-hatere, og ikke minst fake news media;
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6105680773001/
Trump testifying would be a 'trap': Columnist
Fox News contributor and former Reagan White House political director Ed Rollins and Fox News contributor and New York Post columnist Michael Goodwin explain how President Trump is innocent and say 'deep state' actors are the ones who should testify in front of Congress.
Videon er et must for alle DT-hatere, og ikke minst fake news media;
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6105680773001/