PCI Application in Brain Tumors "Kristian Berg"

Stock DZ
PCIB 03.08.2018 kl 09:54 2580

Hi

Fish of the day: Published: 10 Jul 2018

Photodynamic therapy mediated immune therapy of brain tumors
 **** Henry Hirschberg1, Kristian Berg2, Qian Peng3

Link
http://nnjournal.net/article/view/2671

Quote:

"Photochemical internalization

Photochemical internalization (PCI), a derivative of PDT, has been shown to increase the efficacy of drugs, gene transfection as well as a variety of other anti-cancer agents that are taken up into cells by endocytosis[29-33]. PCI is based on the use of specially designed photosensitizers, such as AlPcS2a, TPPS2a, TPcS2a that localize preferentially in the membranes of endocytic and lysosomal intracellular vesicles. Upon exposure to light of appropriate wave lengths, the photosensitizers induce the formation of short range singlet molecular oxygen, destroying the intracellular vesicles membranes, thus leading to the release of the contents of these vesicles into the cell cytosol. The released macromolecules can now exert their full biological activity instead of being degraded by lysosomal hydrolases. 


Norum et al.[34] (2017) has examined the efficacy of PCI delivery of bleomycin (BLM-PCI) and its impact on systemic anti-tumor immunity in an extra-cranial mouse model. Their results showed that both PDT and BLM-PCI were incapable of inducing a curative effect in athymic mice at the light dose tested. In contrast, 50% of the light dose of that used in athymic mice resulted in a curative effect in 90% of the animals after BLM-PCI and 70% after PDT in normal mice. Inhibition of tumor cell growth was observed when combined with co-injection of splenic T cells from mice treated and cured with BLM-PCI. The anti-tumor immunity induced by BLM-PCI was equal to that obtained with PDT treatment, but at a lower light dose. Furthermore, the induced immune response after BLM-PCI was sufficient to reject tumor re-challenge immediately after PCI and lasted for at least two months. 


An additional and novel method for enhancing the efficacy of peptide vaccines in extra cranial studies has been explored by Haug et al.[35] (2018) utilizing PCI to promote the escape of trapped endocytosed peptides into the cytosol of APCs. Their results showed that PCI caused a 30-fold increase in MHC class I/peptide complex formation and surface presentation on APCs, and a subsequent 30- to 100-fold more efficient activation of antigen-specific CTLs compared to using the peptide alone. These in vitro effects of PCI were translatable in vivo by the successful induction of antigen-specific CTL responses to cancer antigens in C57BL/6 mice following intradermal peptide vaccination and local light treatment. It is noteworthy that both macrophages and DC were used as APCs with approximately equal efficacy in these experiments. If these promising PCI strategies might be translatable to post-operative HGG treatment by the use of indwelling balloon light applicators, as has been proposed and tried for both radiation and PDT treatment, remains to be determined[36-39]. 


PDT for the treatment of brain tumors

PDT has been investigated as an adjuvant for the treatment of malignant gliomas for approximately 
35 years[39-43]. Although numerous clinical trials have been initiated, the vast majority have consisted of uncontrolled phase I/II studies containing small numbers of patients. For example, in the single center phase III trial reported by Eljamel et al.[39] using both flourecent guided resction combined with ALA and Photofrin repetitive PDT, a mean overall survival (OS) of the treatment group was 52.8 weeks compared to 24.6 weeks in the control group. In a phase II uncontrolled trial of 22 patients reported by Muragaki et al.[41], using talaporfin sodium as a PS, a median of survival of 99 weeks was observed. This compared favorably to the 54-64 weeks OS obtained from previous trials employing standard post operative treatment consisting of radiation and TMZ. Due to differences in methodology and types of malignant brain tumors treated, it has been very difficult to evaluate PDT efficacy from these limited trials. For a more detailed account of the results of a number of PDT clinical trials for HGG, Bechet et al.[42] and Quirk et al.[43] give an excellent overview. Additionally, none of these clinical trials have included an evaluation of the effects of PDT on the immune response to treatment. Overall, the results of PDT trials for malignant gliomas have been relatively modest, thus providing the rationale for alternative PDT mediated treatment approaches such as PDT induced immunotherapy"

Conclusions:

Although the experience with PDT/PCI produced anti HGG vaccines is limited and no clinical trials have been done, PDT/PCI appears to be an inducer of immunogenic cancer cell death, an important step in the afferent phase of the immune anti-tumor response. Light activated induced immunotherapy therefore holds the potential to become a complementary therapeutic option for for patients with HGG. Taking into account the penetration limitations of light activated therapies in the brain the further development of ex vivo PDT/PCI generated APC or peptide vaccines seems the most attractive approach. A deeper and detailed understanding of the induction of the antitumor immunity induced by light activated therapies would allow in the defining of protocols which would focus and enhance the immune system to recognize and prevent the inevitable post-operative recurrence of the tumor. Combining PDT induced anti-tumor vaccines with other therapeutic modalities including check-point inhibitors, is an exciting field to explore. Although not discussed in this review both PDT and PCI have an effect on the vasculature and have been show to temporarily open the blood brain barrier in a limited site specific region[66-68]. What additional role this would play in the development of an effective and safe anti-HGG patient therapy, remains to be established.
Redigert 20.01.2021 kl 10:29 Du må logge inn for å svare
Stock DZ
03.08.2018 kl 10:05 2544

about the NN Journal where the above paper was published:
Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation (NN) is an international peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. NN aims to provide consensus guidelines and standards for neurologists in Asia-Pacific regions as well to offer advanced research outputs and techniques for clinicians and physicians in the field of neuroscience and neurology worldwide.

bateman
03.08.2018 kl 10:06 2533

Like I said earlier, Pcib strongly needs a BP partner to develeop the potential here! This technoloy is unike and have a vast nummber of possible application, but Pcib don't have the money or resources to develop this alone. And there is not a enough interest or money in Norway to help Pcib with this, they have to go international to fulfill the potential, do you hear med Jonas Einarsson??? Take this company and technology WW, that should be Radforsk main goal for Pcib.
Redigert 03.08.2018 kl 10:08 Du må logge inn for å svare
Stock DZ
03.08.2018 kl 10:15 2481

I personnally think that this is NOT related to Lumiblast project that was featured in media with Erna Solberg visit to Kristian Berg research lab (Lumiblast link below), I think the work in the paper is not related to it, but I might be wrong (forum experts are invited to comment :))

https://www.lumiblast.eu/uploads/7/0/9/9/70997359/lumiblast_factsheet_project_2017-01-20.pdf

PW said tha PCI biotech does not have right of first refusal for Lumiblast (reference Q1 presentation QA session)
Stock DZ
03.08.2018 kl 10:18 2468

I suggest that this is different from lumiblast because the following sounds more like FimaVACC

"An additional and novel method for enhancing the efficacy of peptide vaccines in extra cranial studies has been explored by Haug et al.[35] (2018) utilizing PCI to promote the escape of trapped endocytosed peptides into the cytosol of APCs. Their results showed that PCI caused a 30-fold increase in MHC class I/peptide complex formation and surface presentation on APCs, and a subsequent 30- to 100-fold more efficient activation of antigen-specific CTLs compared to using the peptide alone. These in vitro effects of PCI were translatable in vivo by the successful induction of antigen-specific CTL responses to cancer antigens in C57BL/6 mice following intradermal peptide vaccination and local light treatment"
ILAV
03.08.2018 kl 10:24 2441

Enig med Stock DZ, er det pcib lukter forklaringsmodeller firmaVacc.
Sydney
03.08.2018 kl 11:09 2325

Vi snakker om at pcib lysbehandlign Kan brukes i mange typer kreft. Men om denne artiklene er lysbehandlign generelt, har pcib noen patenter på selve PCI modellen? Eller er det åpent for hvem som helst å bruke dette på for eks en annen indikasjon en gallegang??
gepard1
03.08.2018 kl 11:57 2216

PCI teknologien vil forbedre behandlingen av mange forskjellige sykdommer., ikke bare for kreftbehandling. Ett tosiffret antall, ett stykke opp paa skalaen. Noe som vil bli veldig mye verdt.

Men vi trenger annerkjennelse. For og naa dit maa PCIB bevise at teknologien fungerer. Noe som ikke er veldig langt borte, Vi er helveis dit allerede. Paa ett eller annet tidspunkt vil interessen eksplodere....................Naar det foerst skjer, vil det skje fort.......................det vil komme som ett skred fra alle kanter.......................
Redigert 03.08.2018 kl 12:02 Du må logge inn for å svare