Det eneste stedet OBAMAGATE /FBI -skandalen vokser er inne i skallen til cinet............

OBAMAGATE VOKSER OG VOKSER

En politisk forvirret Dems-dommer må nå forlare seg....

Flynn judge must explain his astounding and offensive refusal to dismiss charges
Is U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan’s collusion cameo nearing its end?

On Thursday the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, on its own motion, ordered Judge Sullivan to respond within 10 days to the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

Earlier this week, Flynn’s counsel, Sidney Powell, filed the petition for that extraordinary writ, asking the appellate court to instruct Sullivan to grant the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss the case against Flynn.

That was after Judge Sullivan not only declined to grant the prosecution’s motion, but (a) invited non-parties to intervene in the case by filing amicus briefs (transparently, to make arguments that he somehow has authority to deny DOJ’s motion); and (b) appointed one amicus, former federal judge John Gleeson, as a quasi-prosecutor to make arguments that prosecutors are declining to make in favor of entering a judgment of conviction and sentencing Flynn.

As I noted Wednesday, Sullivan’s encouragement of amicus briefs, which are not authorized in criminal cases, flies in the face of Sullivan’s own very firm orders previously declining to permit amicus briefs in Flynn’s case – some two dozen times by Powell’s count.

The appointment of Gleeson is equally astonishing and offensive to the principle of courts as impartial arbiters.

"Senate Dems, tired of threatening Supreme Court Justices, turn to the court of appeals for their partisan campaign of judicial intimidation,"

MortenS /Fredrik fake news, WAKE UP

That email screams out CYA CYA CYA CYA (fredrik fake news...for vanskelig for deg?)

"If lies were music, Susan Rice would be Mozart," said Gaetz.
"If I were writing myself an email where three times I had to say I did everything 'by the book,' that is certainly more incriminating than it is exculpatory," he added.

"That email looks like it's written to cover the whole upper level of the administration," said former Trump DOJ Official Ian Prior, who maintains the Rice email was likely the result of discussions between Rice and senior White House officials, rather than at the direction of the White House Counsel's Office. "It's written so if the contents of that meeting are ever exposed, that the history will be written in their narrative."

"That email screams out CYA," said a current Trump administration official who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

“Who writes an email on Inauguration Day saying ‘we did everything by the book?” the official asked. “You only write an email like that to yourself to protect yourself because you have concerns that perhaps there is a problem.”

On Jan. 23, 2017, The Washington Post broke the story that the FBI was looking into communications between Flynn and Kislyak, three days after the Oval Office meeting memorialized in Rice's email.

Prior thinks that is no coincidence: "They were planning to leak that information to the press, and this email was giving them cover. They pulled the pin on the grenade, threw it and this email is them hiding behind the sandbags."

"House Judiciary Committee member Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., told Wednesday that former National Security Adviser Susan Rice's now-declassified email to herself from Inauguration Day 2017 is highly incriminating."

Her er den eposten.
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000172-2e48-d57a-ad7b-7e6f97060000

BIDENGATE

Pay for play korrupsjonen slår direkte tilbake på sleepy creepy joe . han og baby hunter er i tillegg i lommen på kommunistdiktaturet til Xi.

Fredrik fake news wake up !

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky called for an investigation Wednesday of leaked recordings purportedly depicting then-Vice President Joe Biden telling Zelensky's predecessor Petro Poroshenko that his country would receive U.S. aid once top prosecutor Viktor Shokin was replaced.


The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee already has acknowledged such an arrangement publicly. But the leaked audio revived criticism that Biden was engaged in a kind of quid-pro-quo, much like President Trump was accused -- during impeachment proceedings -- of linking U.S. aid to calls for Zelensky to probe Shokin's ouster.

The new audio indicates Poroshenko went along with Biden's plan but did not think Shokin was involved in wrongdoing.
+
Sen. Cotton: No surprise if China wants Joe Biden to win in November
May. 21, 2020 - 5:49 - Republican Sen. Tom Cotton says 2020 hopeful Joe Biden has a 'terrible record' on China and reacts to Sen. Kamala Harris condemning the term 'Wuhan virus.'

link:https://video.foxnews.com/v/6158240606001

OBAMAGATE
BIDENGATE
HILLARYGATE
DNC/DEMSGATE
OFBIGATE

House Judiciary Committee member Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., told Wednesday that former National Security Adviser Susan Rice's now-declassified email to herself from Inauguration Day 2017 is highly incriminating.


"If lies were music, Susan Rice would be Mozart," said Gaetz.

"If I were writing myself an email where three times I had to say I did everything 'by the book,' that is certainly more incriminating than it is exculpatory," he added.

"If Ric Grenell had been the director of national intelligence back in 2017, Jim Comey would probably already be under the jail," Gaetz said, "because the Grenell disclosures laid bare the coup before the American people.

"Obama was involved, Biden was involved, Susan Rice was involved and Jim Comey was set up to be the inside man...," he said.

"Remember all that weird journaling he was doing to try to set the president up on obstruction of justice? Well, now it is exposed."

MortenY,veldig hjelpeløse argumenter du kommer med . Du evner ikke se den episke politiske skandalen, som på nivå med Fredrik fake news ( er du MortenSi tv2?)

More to come ....

""We now know that 39 Obama aides submitted dozens of unmasking requests for calls that involved Flynn," Ingraham began."

Hvis du sjekker brevet fra Grenell til Grassley så ser du at det var "16 individuals" som var ansatt ved ulike kontorer -- ikke "39 Obama aides". Laura Ingraham blander sammen ulike ting.

Det var heller ikke "dozens of unmasking requests", men ca. 40 henvendelser totalt.

OBAMAGATE

"We now know that 39 Obama aides submitted dozens of unmasking requests for calls that involved Flynn," Ingraham began. "The first was made by [then-Ambassador to the United Nations] Samantha Power on November 30, 2016, with the bulk being made between December 14 and 16 of that year.

"Yet what everyone missed was that there was no unmasking request made for the call that set the criminal case against Flynn in motion: his December 28, 2016, call with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak."

a high-ranking source with direct knowledge of the situation" had informed that it was the FBI, not any agency or office within the intelligence community, that was monitoring the call.

"When the FBI circulated the report [on the call], they included Flynn's name from the beginning because it was essential to understanding its significance," . "There were, therefore, no requests, we can conclude, for that unmasking about information."

it is possible that other figures in the Obama administration had access to the call transcript as a potential "second 'insurance policy' against the new administration."

"Or maybe they thought it could be weaponized if Flynn was asked about it later, a few days later, and lied," "We are bound to find out more."

"Now, I've seen many in the NeverTrump World scoff at any suggestion that there was anything improper in these flurry of unmasking requests," "Yet I think it's wrong to focus on the unmasking itself, which is legal. For years, the Deep State lackeys like [former Director of National Intelligence James] Clapper and [former CIA Director John] Brennan claimed Flynn's call was scooped up incidentally, as if it happened almost just by accident."

On the contrary, it has become even more clear that Flynn was not "swept up" by an tangential investigation but was instead "targeted."

"And specifically, he was targeted by Jim Comey's FBI,"

"Again, Flynn had every right to talk to the Russian ambassador. He had every right to discuss any aspect of policy and any suggestions that the Logan Act was somehow a legitimate concern of the Obama people is just preposterous."

FREDRIK FAKE NEWS: WAKE UP !

OBAMAGATE

Fredrik fake news () +PDF WAKE UP
@McEnany accuses Susan Rice of a 'lie' over 2017 interview answer about alleged Trump team surveillance

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany accused former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice of a “lie” in a 2017 interview, when Rice said she knew nothing about the Trump transition team being caught up in surveillance of foreign officials.

“She was asked specifically about [Devin] Nunes' claims,” McEnany told reporters Wednesday. “She said 'I know nothing about this,' so that was a lie.”

During an appearance on PBS News Hour in 2017, Rice was asked about then-breaking revelations about members of President Trump's transition team having been surveilled before he took office.

"In the last few hours, we've been following a disclosure by the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Devin Nunes, that in essence, during the final days of the Obama administration, during the transition after President Trump had been elected, that he and the people around him may have been caught up in surveillance of foreign individuals and their identities may have been disclosed. Do you know anything about this?" PBS anchor Judy Woodruff asked.

"I know nothing about this," Rice said at the time. "I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that count today.”

She later stressed that Nunes' assertion at the time was that the surveillance was "legal and lawful" and that it was a "potentially incidental collection."

"That means that the target was either a foreign entity or somebody under criminal investigation and that the Americans who were talking to those targets may have been picked up," Rice explained.

However, a newly released email appeared to indicate Rice had knowledge of the surveillance that took place that led to the "unmasking" of then-incoming national security adviser Michael Flynn from his communications with the then-Russian ambassador.

The email, which was written on Jan. 20, 2017, documented a Jan. 5 Oval Office meeting with then-President Barack Obama and others, during which he provided guidance on how law enforcement needed to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential race. Parts of it wer previously released, but the section on then-FBI Director James Comey's response had been classified as "TOP SECRET" until now.

Comey suggested to Obama that the National Security Council (NSC) might not want to pass "sensitive information related to Russia" to Flynn, according to a newly declassified email that Flynn's predecessor sent herself on Inauguration Day.

The section showed that Comey affirmed to Obama he was proceeding "by the book," and went on to discuss concerns about Flynn's known conversations with Russia's ambassador at the time -- conversations that would play a role later in the criminal case against Flynn.

Rice continued in her email: "From a national security perspective, Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador [Sergey] Kislyak. Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing sensitive information. President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn."

Rice then wrote: "Comey replied, 'potentially.' He added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak, but he noted that 'the level of communication is unusual.'"

McEnany said Wednesday that even after the Jan. 5 meeting, Rice went to a passing-of-the-baton event with Flynn “where she praised him, wished him success and talked about the great transition into the White House.”

In a statement Tuesday evening about the email's release, a representative for Rice stressed that “no discussion of law enforcement matters or investigations took place, despite accusations to the contrary.” The spokeswoman also insisted the Obama administration did not change the way it briefed Flynn, saying Rice briefed Flynn for more than 12 hours on four separate occasions during the transition.

“Ambassador Rice did not alter the way she briefed Michael Flynn on Russia as a result of Director Comey’s response,” representative Erin Pelton said.

Last week, a list of top Obama officials who had requested the "unmasking" of Flynn was released. The list included Comey, former Vice President Joe Biden, former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper, former U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power and former White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough.

OBAMAGATE RULLER VIDERE

Mollie Hemingway: Obama becoming 'chattier' as more is learned about Flynn investigation

PDF forholder seg til fake news, som ikke vil forstå eller skrive om denne mega skandalen!
The Federalist senior editor Mollie Hemingway told “The Brian Kilmeade Show” Wednesday that former President Barack Obama is “a little bit chattier” as more information regarding the investigation into former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is revealed.

“[Obama’s] becoming more public as we learn more about how he went after him and undermined the peaceful transfer of government from his administration to the Trump administration and I think that’s why he’s a little bit chattier,” Hemingway, a Fox News contributor, told host Brian Kilmeade.

On Saturday, former President Obama, while speaking at an event for students graduating from historically black colleges and universities that was broadcast on social media, took a shot at government officials in charge of responding to the coronavirus, arguing that the pandemic showed they were incompetent.

Although Obama didn't directly name President Trump, he has previously criticized the administration's response as plagued by selfishness.

Obama’s comments came following the Justice Department’s move earlier this month to drop its case against Flynn after internal memos were released raising serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynn’s late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI.

The statements also came after a list of names was made public last week revealing that top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period.

Hemingway noted Obama “is becoming more public,” during a conversation with host Brian Kilmeade regarding the traditional reluctance among presidents to criticize a successor.

Kilmeade noted on Wednesday that “things have certainly changed” and asked Hemingway, “what happened to that presidents club?”
“This is a norm that we’ve had for a really long time, this idea that presidents should not undermine their successors or attack each other,” Hemingway said in response. “This hasn’t really been kept to as perfectly as some people think. I mean there are plenty of examples of people privately or publicly disparaging their successors.”

She added that Obama has “done far more than verbally go after Trump.”

Fredrik fake news m.fl. prøver desperat å skjule denne episke politiske skandalen.
Norske fake news medier er opptatt av manipulerte Wuhan virus tall , og er nærmest euforiske hvis Brazil og USA har store dødstall. De er lang lang bak Sverige i antall døde pr.inygger.

cinet


Her er en liten sak som viser hvilkne realiteter det er i denne saken .

Tror du skal lytte nøye på denne.
-------------------

USA: Hva er egentlig Obamagate?

https://play.acast.com/s/aftenpodden/2ac8730b-fdfd-4985-a0e4-89a14f8f9e6b

OBAMAGATE...

Nå brenner det under beina på en del x-dems/deep state kuppmakere ..

Comey mum on email suggesting move to freeze out Flynn, as Rice says she ignored advicer

A newly declassified email that former National Security Adviser Susan Rice sent herself on President Trump’s inauguration day has raised new questions about James Comey’s role in the outgoing Obama administration’s treatment of Michael Flynn -- but the former FBI director has not yet publicly commented on the contents of the memo.


The email Rice sent to herself on Jan. 20, 2017, documented a Jan. 5 Oval Office meeting with former President Barack Obama and others, during which he provided guidance on how law enforcement should address Russian interference in the 2016 presidential race. Parts of it were released previously, but the section on Comey's response had been classified as "TOP SECRET" until now.

That section says Comey suggested to Obama that the National Security Council [NSC] might not want to pass “sensitive information related to Russia” to incoming National Security Adviser Flynn.

The email pointed to what were apparently widespread concerns about Flynn's Russa contacts. Multiple sources confirmed to Fox News that what initially put Flynn on the radar was the number of interactions he had with senior Russian government officials in 2016, as laid out in various intelligence reports viewed by Obama White House

Comey appeared to go a step further, however, in suggesting in that meeting that the administration might not want to share sensitive information with Flynn.

According to the email, Obama brought up that consideration, saying "he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.”

Comey affirmed to Obama he was proceeding "by the book," according to the note, and went on to discuss concerns about Flynn's known conversations with Russia's ambassador at the time -- conversations that would play a role later in the criminal case against Flynn.

Rice wrote: "From a national security perspective, Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador [Sergey] Kislyak. Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing sensitive information. President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn.”

Rice then wrote, "Comey replied, 'potentially.' He added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak, but he noted that 'the level of communication is unusual.’”

But on Tuesday, a spokeswoman for Rice indicated that despite Comey’s suggestion, others in the Obama administration did not necessarily proceed that way. She said Rice, for one, did not change the way she dealt with her successor.

“The email makes clear that the Obama Administration did not change the way it briefed Michael Flynn—but rather that President Obama asked Director Comey ‘to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team,’” Rice representative Erin Pelton said in a statement.

Fredrik fake news .. wake up ! En episk politisk skandale med kuppforsøk etter valget /rett før overtagelse. .

OBAMAGATE.....

Dems utsatt for kollektiv hukommelsessvikt/dementes.
«I know nothing about this »
Susan Rice's resurfaced 2017 comments denying knowledge of Trump team surveillance raise eyebrows

FBI chief Wray after Susan Rice email declassified: 'Will you ever hold anyone accountable?'

Johnson says declassified Rice email shows Obama officials 'sabotaging the incoming administration'

This would eventually lead to Flynn being interviewed, amid supposed concern he had violated the obscure and never-successfully-enforced Logan Act, and later pleading guilty to lying to investigators about his Kislyak talks. He later sought to withdraw that plea.

The mention of that Oval Office meeting aligned with Rice’s email describing the Jan. 5, 2017 meeting.

Rice's office downplayed the significance of that email when it first surfaced in early 2018, raising questions at the time from congressional Republicans.

Meanwhile, Grenell's move to declassify the Rice email comes just days after he declassified a list of top Obama administration officials who purportedly requested to “unmask” the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period.

The roster featured top-ranking figures including Brennan, Biden, Comey, Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

OBAMAGATE.... De trodde de skulle styre videre med deep state....

Former FBI Director James Comey suggested to then-President Barack Obama in a January 2017 meeting that the National Security Council might not want to pass "sensitive information related to Russia" to then-incoming national security adviser Michael Flynn, according to a newly declassified email that Flynn's predecessor sent herself on Inauguration Day.

The note from Susan Rice was declassified by Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell and transmitted to the Justice Department.

The Jan. 20, 2017 email Rice sent to herself documented a Jan. 5, 2017 Oval Office meeting with Obama and others, where he provided guidance on how law enforcement should investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential race. Parts of it were previously released, but the section on Comey's response had been classified as "TOP SECRET" until now.

The section says that Comey affirmed to Obama he was proceeding "by the book."

Rice continued: "From a national security perspective, Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador Kislyak. Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing sensitive information. President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn."

RIce then wrote, "Comey replied 'potentially.' He added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak, but he noted that 'the level of communication is unusual.'"

Republicans have zeroed in on the Susan Rice email amid heightened questions over the handling of the Russia probe and top-level awareness inside the Obama administration.

Sens. Johnson, R-Wis., and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, had requested that the Trump administration declassify Rice’s entire email late Monday.

Rice’s email to herself was first flagged in 2018 by Grassley, R-Iowa, the former Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who now sits as chairman of the panel. The email was partially unclassified at the time and appeared to detail the Jan. 5, 2017, meeting, which included Obama, Rice, then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former Vice President Joe Biden.

“President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the intelligence and law enforcement communities ‘by the book,’” Rice emailed to herself. “The president stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.”

The email also appeared to reflect Obama’s guidance on sharing sensitive information with both the Russians and the incoming Trump administration.

Rice wrote that Obama said, “he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.”

This is where the original version of the email was redacted -- containing information about Comey's response.

After that section, Rice wrote: “The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would.”

Russia probe files released as part of the Justice Department's move to drop its case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn brought renewed focus on Rice’s email.An exhibit in the DOJ's motion to dismiss the Flynn case earlier this month detailed a special counsel interview of former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates. The interview indicated Obama was aware of Flynn’s intercepted December 2016 phone calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the presidential transition period.

The document noted Yates learned about the calls during that meeting.

After the briefing, Obama asked Yates and Comey to "stay behind," and said he had "learned of the information about Flynn" and his conversation with Russia's ambassador about sanctions. Obama "specified that he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information.”

At that point, the document said, "Yates had no idea what the president was talking about, but figured it out based on the conversation. Yates recalled Comey mentioning the Logan Act, but can't recall if he specified there was an 'investigation.' Comey did not talk about prosecution in the meeting.”

This would eventually lead to Flynn being interviewed, amid supposed concern he

FREDRIK FAKE NEWS WAKE UP

Nikab/Jhabba, ang Barr vs Barak do nothin OBAMAGATE/ Sleepy creepy Joe BIDENGATE

Barr says he doesn't envision criminal investigations of Obama, Biden in Russia probe

Attorney General William Barr’s remarks on Monday, signaling that the Justice Department anticipates no criminal charges against former President Obama and former Vice President Biden, should come as a surprise to no one (certainly, ahem, to no one who read "Ball of Collusion").

As I noted less than a month ago, the AG observed during a wide-ranging interview with Hugh Hewitt that the subjects of the Durham investigation are not candidates for public office; thus, they were not affected by a Justice Department guideline against bringing charges close to Election Day.

By then, Biden was already the putative Democratic presidential nominee. Obviously, if serious consideration were being given to an indictment of Biden, Barr would not have made the point about the guideline.

To be sure, the media reporting will portray Barr’s latest comments as indicative of a rift between the AG and President Trump, whose latest “Obamagate” rhetoric frames Obama-era investigative abuses as “crime.”

Barr’s remarks will also be applauded as an “exoneration” of Obama officials — consistent with the media approach that portrays Democrats as innocent victims of right-wing smears if they manage to evade indictment, while a “guilty until proved innocent beyond any doubt” standard is applied to Republicans.

Barr’s comments will feature in the “nothing to see here” storyline, the press’s counter to stunning revelations about the baselessness of the Russia collusion narrative willfully peddled by Democrats, and the exploitation of counterintelligence powers — powers that are supposed to protect us from jihadists and hostile regimes — for partisan political purposes.

To the contrary, my sense is that the AG believes there is plenty to see and be outraged about. It simply may not be criminal.

Er du en ukjent sønn av Trump ?

OBAMAGATE OFBI
Pientka er avslørt som deep state/OFBI

'Where is Christopher Wray?' GOP lawmakers say FBI director ignoring them -- and push ahead for key interviews

Reps. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Mike Johnson, R-La., on Monday night said FBI Director Christopher Wray "has declined to respond" to their May 4 letter seeking information and interviews with key FBI officials after the bombshell revelations in the Michael Flynn case -- prompting the lawmakers to take matters into their own hands.

"Because Director Wray has declined to respond to our request, we are forced to write to you directly," Jordan and Johnson wrote in an extraordinary letter to FBI agent Joe Pientka, who participated in the January 2017 White House interview that led to Flynn's prosecution.

Fox News previously determined that Pientka also was intimately involved in the probe of former Trump aide Carter Page, which the DOJ has since acknowledged was riddled with fundamental errors and premised on a discredited dossier that the bureau was told could be part of a Russian disinformation campaign.

Pientka was removed from the FBI's website after Fox News contacted the FBI about his extensive role in Crossfire Hurricane Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) matters -- a change first noticed by Twitter user Techno Fog -- but sources said Pientka remained in a senior role at the agency's San Francisco field office. The FBI told Fox News shortly before Pientka's removal from the website that reporting on his identity could endanger his life, even though he serves in a prominent senior role at the bureau

Jordan and Johnson sent a similar letter on Monday to an attorney for Bill Priestap, the former assistant director of the FBI Counterintelligence Division.

Explosive handwritten notes that surfaced earlier this month -- written by Priestap after a meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey and then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Fox News is told -- suggested that agents planned to interview Flynn at the White House on January 24, 2017 "to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired."

Nikab(jhabba) Barr snakket om kriminaletterforskning/straffeforfølgelse. Barak do nothing og sleepy joe er avslørt , og kledd naken, men vil aldri bli dømt til fengsel . Barak do nothing er i tillegg vernet som tidligere president . Håper sleepy creepy joe blir dems kandidat. Da er det bare å finne frem popcorn i november .

USAs justisminister Bill Barr regner ikke med noen granskning av verken Barack Obama eller Jo Biden i kjølvannet av saken som handlet om russisk valgpåvirkning.

Barrs uttalelse mandag kommer etter at president Donald Trump tok til orde for en granskning av sin forgjenger, som flere ganger har kommet med krass kritikk av Trump-administrasjonens koronahåndtering.

Biden blir etter alt å dømme Trumps hovedutfordrer i høstens presidentvalg, og Barr sier han ønsker å få en slutt på at USAs rettsvesen blir brukt til det han kaller «politiske etterforskninger», spesielt i et valgår.

– Det er svært viktig at vi får et valg der det amerikanske folket vil kunne velge mellom president Trump og visepresident Biden basert på en sterkt debatt om politiske saker. Vi kan ikke la prosessen bli kapret av forsøk på å tromme sammen en etterforskning av noen av kandidatene, sier han.

(NTB)Les om dramaet rundt det Trump har kalt “Obamagate” her.

OBAMAGATE .....FREDRIK FAKE NEWS WAKE UP !

Obamagate matters – media should focus on these facts, not conspiracy theories
No, President Donald Trump is not ranting and raving about Obamagate to keep himself center stage or to distract attention from COVID-19, as liberal media are suggesting. They still don't get Trump.

Two recent columns contend that Trump has ulterior motives in harping on Obamagate – the notion that the Obama administration tried to destroy Trump with the myth that he colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election.

Wrong. How about we draw the most obvious inferences from Trump's statements instead of the liberal establishment's theories, which are far more outlandish than the Obamagate conspiracy they're ridiculing.

Everyone knows that Trump has long been outraged by the Russia hoax, and with good reason. Even after he has been thoroughly vindicated of this frame job, the perpetrators have escaped accountability, and the left still pretends Trump is the guilty party.

Trump was effectively exonerated when the vaunted, high-powered and obscenely funded team of Special Counsel Robert Mueller couldn't find a shred of evidence to tie Trump to Russian election meddling. Now, with the revelation that Obama administration officials and the FBI collaborated to incriminate former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, the retired Army lieutenant general, we have a smoking .357 Magnum in the hands of scores of those officials.

It is the liberal media – not Trump – who are trying to divert the public's attention from a story – the one showcasing the Democrats' complicity.

If we had never heard of COVID-19, Trump would be railing against this corruption even more vigorously than he is now, because most of his day is consumed by virus-related health and economic issues. But don't bother telling that to Trump-obsessed journos.

CNN's Oliver Darcy writes that although the virus has killed more than 82,000 and left millions unemployed, Trump and his conservative media allies are "constructing a separate alternate reality to keep their fans distracted from the news and outraged at the long-standing villains in the right-wing media universe."

Though this might stun Darcy, we hayseed Trump deplorables are capable of walking and chewing tobacco simultaneously. Notwithstanding our diminished capacity, we stay abreast of virus and economic updates, which constitute 99.9 percent of the news, even with coverage of the Obamagate story the liberal media are trying to suppress.

Actually, Trump wants us to focus on the virus and on out-of-work Americans because he is determined to prudently reopen the economy precisely to help the same people these journos claim he is ignoring. If Trump were trying to shift our attention from the economy or the virus, why would he publicly disagree with Dr. Anthony Fauci on the reopening of schools in the fall? Moreover, it is inconceivable that he could avoid virus-related issues during the campaign even if he tried. The media's diversion claim is patently absurd.

Politico's Jack Shafer is promoting the bizarre theory that Trump is pushing Obamagate and other "outrageous claims" because he wants the spotlight on himself, even if only for critical coverage:

"Making him the subject of our conversations is almost as good to Trump as making him the video camera's focal point. ... Obviously, he'd like it better if the commentariat praised him, but if they're going to criticize him, he's content to annotate the insults and censures and repurpose them as offensive weapons. ... Baseless charges like these (Obamagate, China, Joe Scarborough, QAnon) are the perfect refuge of a rhetorical arsonist like Trump, who scorches the earth with controversy and confusion so nobody knows where to find the truth."

Sorry, Mr. Schafer, but Trump truly believes he was set up with the Russia hoax, and the evidence supports him. That's why he's ranting about it even while COVID-19 is still with us.

No matter how much you mock it, no matter how much you want the country to focus solely on the virus, life has to go on, and other issues, especially Obamagate, still matter.

There must be a reckoning for the political party that abused governmental power to engineer a coup against the other party. In a saner world, Democrats would agree with this, as it was the premise upon which the bogus Russia-Trump investigation was based.

Progressives pounded the table for three years over Trump's alleged theft of the election, and they now expect us to shuffle docilely into the night when we have his opponents dead to rights doing the very thing they accused him of doing?

So, no, gentlemen, you are hopelessly off base. Trump intends to keep the coronavirus-related issues on the front burner. They must be if he is to lead America back to health and wealth. Unlike the left, he is not ignoring the economic devastation caused by this virus. Unlike the left, he is taking action instead of engaging in "rhetorical arson," if I may humbly borrow Schafer's incendiary term.

The left can smear Trump from their basements for not waving his wand and immediately accelerating our COVID-19 testing capacity to a billion per month and for the economic devastation caused by shutting down the economy. But they show unprecedented audacity blaming him for a death count that would have been worse and for an economic shutdown that would go on indefinitely if they were in charge.

Unhappily for the media, President Trump is alert, engaged and proactively addressing a comprehensive range of issues affecting Americans. He is fully capable of calling attention to this Democratic corruption of shocking magnitude without impeding his efforts to make America well and prosperous again.

OBAMAGATE.... MORE TO COME

Flynn would have known Russia probe was 'fishy and problematic,' became 'high-priority target'

The Federalist senior editor and Fox News contributor Mollie Hemingway told "Life, Liberty & Levin" Sunday that an email written by former National Security Adviser Susan Rice on the day President Trump was inaugurated reveals an Obama administration effort to "sideline" officials who may have had concerns about the counterintelligence probe of the Trump campaign.

Host Mark Levin asked Hemingway about the idea that Rice raced back to the White House just after noon on Inauguration Day to send a "self-serving" email regarding a Jan. 5 Oval Office meeting where the investigation of her designated successor, Michael Flynn, apparently was discussed.

According to Levin, Rice wrote in the email that Obama "stress[ed] his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the intelligence and law enforcement communities by the book."

Hemingway said the word "continued" suggested that Obama knew about the Trump campaign investigation prior to the Jan. 5 meeting.

"What I also like is when she says they openly talked with the people who would be continuing on into the Trump administration about how to keep information from the Trump administration, and that is completely inappropriate," she said.

"This was about making sure that they could sideline people who would expose what they had been doing throughout the campaign, throughout the transition," Hemingway said, adding that Flynn likely became "target number one" because he had the experience and knowledge of the intelligence field that would have enabled him to call foul on the Obama administration's actions.

"He would have known that it was fishy and problematic. And so he was a high-priority target in the days that followed," she said.

"Almost immediately after this January 5 meeting, you start seeing a coordinated leak campaign to set a false narrative about some crazy story about Russia collusion," Hemingway added, blaming the "compliant and complicit" mainstream media for "regurgitat[ing]" White House leaks that painted a picture of the Russia collusion narrative.

FREDRIK FAKE NEWS..:WAKE UP
JHABBA/NIKAB.... GAME OVER. DEEP STATE IN PANIC MODE

Video link:https://video.foxnews.com/v/6157014646001

Fjern dommeren om han ikke dømmer til fordel for presidentens venner.
Kom ikke å si at jeg ikke har advart om dette.

OBAMAGATE

Klar tale til den politiske deep state dommeren i Flynn-saken;

"Take this case away from this rogue, partisan, anti-Trump, pro-Obama judge,"
"Take it away from him and end this travesty."

"This judge is an eyewitness to the corruption. This judge has failed to handle this trial properly, for instance. The government is compelled to provide any exculpatory evidence and other information it has to the defense. It clearly did not,"

Video link:https://video.foxnews.com/v/6157176468001

A MUST TO C, FREDRIK FAKE NEWS WAKE UP

Video link:https://video.foxnews.com/v/6157241491001

OBAMAGATE RULLER VIDERE...

Barak do nothing Obama, og sleepy creepy Joe prøver å flytte fokus, men.... dette blir den episke politiske skandalen i USA.
Fredrik fake news/ Urix/NRK WAKE UP
President Trump called the Russia Probe “the greatest political crime in the history of our country, ” and labeled his former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn a hero, in an exclusive interview that aired Sunday with Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo.

Trump's comments, during the interview on “Sunday Morning Futures,” come after the Justice Department this month moved to drop its case against Flynn, in a stunning development that follows internal memos being released and raises serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynn’s late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI.
“They [FBI agents] weren't after General Flynn. They wanted him to lie about me, make up a story,” Trump told Bartiromo. “And with few exceptions, nobody did that.”

He added, “If I were a Democrat instead of a Republican, I think everybody would have been in jail a long time ago; and I'm talking with 50-year sentences.”
“It is a disgrace what's happened,” he continued. “This is the greatest political scam, hoax in the history of our country.”

Trump went on to say that "people should be going to jail for this stuff and hopefully a lot of people are going to have to pay."

“No other president should have to go through [this] and I'll tell you, General Flynn and others are heroes,” Trump continued.
Trump also reacted to top Obama administration officials, including former Vice President Joe Biden, purportedly requesting to "unmask" the identity of Flynn -- whose calls with the former Russian ambassador during the presidential transition were picked up in surveillance and later leaked.

The list of names was revealed after it was declassified in recent days by Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell and then sent to GOP Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson, who made the documents public.
The unmasking concerns events between the November 2016 election and Inauguration Day 2017.

Unmasking occurs after U.S. citizens' conversations are incidentally picked up in conversations with foreign officials who are being monitored by the intelligence community. The U.S. citizens' identities are supposed to be protected if their participation is incidental and no wrongdoing is suspected. However, officials can determine the U.S. citizens' names through a process that is supposed to safeguard their rights.

The list revealed that then-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power made unmasking requests seven times between Nov. 30, 2016 and Jan. 11, 2017. Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper made three requests from Dec. 2, 2016 through Jan. 7, 2017; and that former CIA Director John Brennan made two requests, one on Dec. 14 and one on Dec. 15, 2016. Former FBI Director James Comey also made a request on Dec. 15, 2016. On Jan. 5, 2017, then-Chief of Staff Denis McDonough made one request, and on Jan. 12, 2017, Biden made one request.

"This was all Obama. This was all Biden. These people were corrupt," Trump told Bartiromo. "The whole thing was corrupt and we caught them."
Trump went on to say that "they never thought" that they would get "caught in the act," adding that "they got sloppy."
Trump elaborated, telling Bartiromo that he thinks “Comey is a corrupt person… Brennan [is] bad. They’re all bad. Clapper is not a smart guy in charge of intelligence.”

“But here's the thing: It was impossible for it to happen without the man that sits right in that chair in the Oval Office. He knew everything,” he continued.
Bartiromo then asked Trump, “Do you believe President Obama directed the U.S. intelligence agencies to spy on you?”

“Yes, he probably directed them, but if he didn't direct them, he knew everything,” Trump said in response.
Trump then brought up text messages between FBI paramours Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, which included an exchange about preparing talking points for Comey to give to President Obama, who wanted “to know everything we’re doing." The pair both worked at one point for Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe of alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Remember the Lisa Page text to her lover saying ‘POTUS wants to see everything?’ They're not talking about me. I wasn't president. They're talking about POTUS wants to see everything,” Trump told Bartiromo.

Trump added that "if this happened to Obama instead of me everybody would be in jail for years already."
"It's a disgraceful thing," he continued. "But we caught them in the act. It's a beautiful thing. And every day we're seeing more and more information come out."
Trump went on to say that "Comey and all these guys" were "guarding the fort."
"And once they left, it got easier and easier and now it's like an avalanche of really bad, call it treason, call it whatever you want, but they tried to take down a duly elected president of the United States,” he said.

Trump also brought up Biden’s appearance on ABC’s “Good Morning America” last week where the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee said that he was “aware” at the time of the investigation started by Obama administration officials into Flynn.

During the interview, ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos pressed Biden, questioning whether he attended the Oval Office meeting on Jan. 5, 2017, where Flynn apparently was discussed.

In response Biden said, “I was aware that there was—that they asked for an investigation, but that’s all I know about it, and I don’t think anything else ...”

“He could barely speak,” Trump told Bartiromo, referencing Biden's interview on ABC. “He was on ‘Good Morning America’ right? And he said he didn't know anything about it… right after he said that, it gets released that he was one of the unmaskers, meaning he knew everything about it, so he lied to your friend George Stephanopoulos.”

Nikab/jhabba....dems/DNC og OBAMAGATE er sykt, ellers er alt bra i usa
Fakta; De dyrker ikke bananer i usa.... wake up

Og, ellers har du det bra ?

Obama er et svik, en løgner, en landsforræder. Denne venstreradikale svikeren spytter på eget lands presidentembedet og frihetsidealene og hyller Iran og Kina.

Hele USA er en skandale. En bananstat. https://www.nrk.no/urix/ikke-bli-syk.-det-er-for-dyrt_-1.15018309

Copy and paste har du ihvertfall lært deg, moron.

MORE TO COME

In addition to an investigation of spying on American citizens by the Obama administration, all Obama administration rule changes making it easier to unmask the names of members of Congress and ordinary Americans from intelligence reports need to be reversed immediately.

There also should be a requirement in the law restricting when U.S. officials can unmask the names of members of a presidential campaign or incoming administration from intelligence reports or otherwise spy on them. These rules should include a requirement for congressional notification if such spying is deemed necessary in the future.

Finally, I want to know why career intelligence officials cooperated with unmasking Trump campaign and transition officials at the request of the Obama administration.

Since the prohibition on spying on American citizens and keeping the names of U.S citizens out of intelligence reports are cardinal rules of the U.S. intelligence community, how could career intelligence officers agree to process hundreds of these requests? Why did none of them file complaints with their inspector general or the congressional intelligence oversight committees?

The hundreds of unmasking requests of Trump campaign and transition officials made by the Obama administration were in no way routine and necessary. I believe carrying out these unmasking requests was a huge ethical lapse by dozens – maybe hundreds – of U.S. intelligence community employees that must be addressed by the White House and the leaders of our intelligence agencies.

Osten, MortenY, Nikab/Jhhabba - les og lær. Fredrik fake news SHAME ON U !

Barak do notin Ohbama er i panic mode, prøver å flytte fokus, med å legge skylden på Wuhan kommunistdiktaturets pandemi over på presidenten over alle presidenter DT. Obama er deperat. Hele kuppforsøket er iferd me å bli avslørt, Durham tar seg av resten, og.....Fredrik fake news har ikke forstått det enda... PATETISK

Trump og Burthalter hilser, og sier gratulerer med dagen.

OBAMAGATE ruller videre, og han hilser på sin spesielle måte

Obamagate – How Obama administration apparently weaponized intel agencies for political attacks

There is strong evidence that President Barack Obama’s administration improperly weaponized U.S. intelligence agencies in multiple and shocking ways against Donald Trump and other political enemies.

It appears the Obama administration did this in a number of ways, including: fraudulently obtaining Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants to spy on American citizens; promoting the Democratic National Committee-funded dossier assembled by former British spy Christopher Steele that was filled with lies about Trump; politicizing intelligence analysis; leaking intelligence; and spying on political opponents and journalists.

In the period when he was a presidential candidate and president-elect, Trump and his aides seemed to have been the major targets of this misuse of American intelligence for political purposes. But they were not the only targets.

It is imperative to uncover the extent of the Obama administration’s abuse of U.S. intelligence for political purposes. This must include a full list of every American unmasked from intelligence reports – Trump aides, members of Congress, and ordinary Americans – and who made these requests.

It would be irresponsible for the intelligence community and Congress to turn a blind eye to this abuse simply because it happened years ago. Wrongdoing by the Obama administration in this scandal – which President Trump has dubbed “Obamagate” – must be exposed to ensure such actions never take place again.

This week’s revelation that an astounding 39 Obama administration officials – including then-Vice President Joe Biden – made 53 requests to unmask incoming Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn’s name from National Security Agency phone intercepts between Election Day on Nov. 8, 2016 and Jan. 12, 2017 was a bombshell.

The stunning revelation regarding Obama administration spying on Flynn by secretly recording his conversations with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. at the time appears to confirm allegations by President Trump and his supporters of a broad effort by the Obama administration to weaponize intelligence to undermine the Trump presidency shortly before it began.

Flynn was simply carrying out his duties by making contact with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the transition period after Trump was elected president. It is perfectly routine for incoming members of a new presidential administration dealing with foreign affairs to contact foreign officials to introduce themselves before taking office.

Making this worse, the 53 unmasking requests by Obama administration officials are probably the tip of the iceberg of the Obama administration’s abuse of National Security Agency intelligence to target Trump aides.

House Intelligence Committee ranking member Devin Nunes, R-Calif. confirmed this in a Fox Business interview this week on “Lou Dobbs Tonight” when he said the Flynn unmasking scandal is “even worse than this” because “a whole lot” of other Trump associates were unmasked.

With this in mind, it is frustrating to see former Obama officials, the mainstream media and some former intelligence officials brush off the Flynn unmasking requests by claiming such requests are “normal and routine” and that all relevant rules and laws were complied with.

As a former CIA officer who helped process requests to unmask the names of U.S. citizens from National Security Agency reports, I know that unmasking requests are not normal and routine. And I believe these requests raise serious civil rights and legal issues that have not yet been addressed.

From my 25 years working in U.S. government national security jobs, I know how sensitive and rare unmasking requests are.

Names of U.S. citizens mentioned in U.S. intelligence reports – often National Security Agency communications intercepts – are redacted because under U.S. law, America’s foreign intelligence services are normally not permitted to spy on U.S. citizens.

Although senior U.S. officials are permitted to ask for the identity of a redacted name in an intelligence report (an unmasking request), such requests are unusual and the requestor must have a “need to know” the identity of the U.S. person to understand the foreign intelligence information or assess its importance.

When the request is approved, the unmasked identity is released only to the person who requested it – not to everyone who might have seen the original version of the report.

For example, during my time at the State Department from 2001-2006, Deputy Secretary Richard Armitage made about 100 demasking requests. Then-Under Secretary of State John Bolton only made 10 in four years.

Ironically, Senate Democrats made Bolton’s unmasking requests an issue during his 2005 nomination to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations by falsely claiming these requests were improper and made to intimidate people and gain political advantage.

Then-Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., said at the time that unmasking requests were “rarely requested” and made “infrequently” by “non-career political appointees such as Mr. Bolton.”

An April 14, 2005, New York Times article said this about unmasking requests in connection with the Bolton confirmation hearings: “The identities of American officials whose communications are intercepted are usually closely protected by law, and not included even in classified intelligence reports. Access to the names may be authorized by the N.S.A. only in response to special requests, and these are not common, particularly from policy makers.”

The above statements about the rarity of unmasking requests are consistent with what I witnessed during my government career. In addition, the National Security Agency tightened the rules in 2005 on unmasking because of the controversy over such requests caused by the Bolton hearing.

The Obama administration, however, appeared to weaken the unmasking rules.
The Obama administration expanded access to National Security Agency information in February 2016 and on January 12, 2017. Both changes appeared to allow larger numbers of government officials to have access to unmasked names of Americans in intelligence reporting.

Even more troubling was a major rollback by the Obama administration in rules protecting members of Congress from unmasking requests.

I know from my five years on House Intelligence Committee staff of longstanding sensitivity by lawmakers that U.S. intelligence agencies could be used by the executive branch to spy on a president’s political enemies. For this reason, until 2013 there were strict limits to keep members of Congress out of intelligence reporting and to prevent unmasking their names.

Under a policy in effect in the 1990s, unmasking requests of the names of members of Congress were extremely limited and generally had to be reported to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.
According to the Wall Street Journal, these rules were tightened further with “a 2011 NSA directive [that] required direct communications between foreign intelligence targets and members of Congress to be destroyed, but [gave] the NSA director the authority to waive this requirement if he determines the communications contain ‘significant foreign intelligence.””

However, in 2013 the Obama administration significantly weakened rules on unmasking the names of members of Congress from intelligence reports. The requestor’s reason could now merely be “to fully understand the intelligence.”

Rules on notifying Congress also were weakened. National Security Agency officials henceforth would notify Congress when members were unmasked from intelligence reports “as appropriate” and would determine “whether and to what extent congressional notification would take place.”

The Obama administration appeared to take advantage of these rules changes in 2015 when it obtained private conversations from National Security Agency reports of U.S. lawmakers who opposed the Iran nuclear deal in meetings with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The rule changes on unmasking the names of members of Congress have a direct bearing on the Obama administration’s unmasking of Trump aides.

Since there no longer was a prohibition on using U.S. intelligence agencies to spy on members of Congress, Obama officials probably reasoned there was nothing to prevent them from spying on members of a presidential campaign or an incoming presidential administration. This helps explain the hundreds of unmasking requests regarding Trump aides in 2016 and early 2017.

So what should happen now?
Fredrik fake news WAKE UP, Urix/NRK PATETISK !!

OBAMAGATE

Op-ed: Scale of Obama's team spying on Trump campaign should be focus of 'unmasking'
'The Plot Against the President'

EN EPISKE POLITISK SKANDALE

Video link:https://video.foxnews.com/v/6157102138001

Nunes oppdaget dette i mars 2017. Deep state members n deep state media har prøvd å skjule fakta i 3år.. GAME OVER.
Durham vil avsløre ALT

OBAMAGATE

OFBI er totalt avslørt og ... more to come ..
Missing Flynn 302 case report could have 'many iterations,' not necessarily representative of Flynn's statements

The FBI's “302” case report of the investigation into former Trump national security adviser Gen. Michael Flynn has likely been heavily edited and there may be many iterations of it, National Review columnist and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andy McCarthy said Saturday.


McCarthy explained that 302s -- the bureau's report of an interview -- follow an archaic practice that "really lends itself to manipulation and worse."

Within five days following the interview, the pair of agents congregate and write up a report of the interview using notes and their memory.
But this 302 took 3 weeks to "complete" with heavy editing: He noted that texts between agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page show that Flynn's "302" went through "major revisions and edits."
Guess it take 3 weeks to put the right "spin" on it. Would be nice to see ALL the edits after the original.
Bet that would tell a nice story.
BUT Strzok and his mistress Page are bias liars, so we know how corrupt the FBI is.

Is 302 document the key to exposing plot to take down Gen. Flynn?

Video link:https://video.foxnews.com/v/6157102184001

FRedrik fake news , wake up , dine «analyser» på tv2 er PATETISKE

OBAMAGATE;

The "number of questions" that were raised by the "actions" the Obama administration, listing the Democratic National Committee-funded Steele dossier and its involvement in the FISA warrants that were granted to surveil former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page \as well as the unmasking of Flynn by top Obama officials during the transition period between November 2016 and January 2017.

The Oval Office meeting that took place just days before Trump's inauguration between President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and acting Attorney General Sally Yates, "learned" about the unmasking from Obama and not from the Justice Department.

"We know that there was a lot of wrongdoing in the case of Michael Flynn. The FBI notes, for instance, that said, 'Should we,' quote, 'get him to lie,' as they pontificated their strategy," "We know that the identity of this three-decade general was leaked to the press -- a criminal leak to the press of his identity in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. These are very serious questions. They've been ignored by the media for far too long. And I'm very glad that I think that is the second question that I have fielded on Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, because justice does matter. Those questions, they matter."

"if you want to start talking about wrongdoing in the administration, I’m happy to go through Andy McCabe leaking to The Wall Street Journal and then lying about it, happy to talk about James Clapper lying before Congress, saying the NSA does not monitor phone calls. That was an inaccuracy, to say the least, if not a lie," . "And John Brennan telling Congress that the bogus Steele dossier played no role in the Russia probe, when, in fact, we know it did and was the basis of attaining FISA warrants. So there's a lot of mistruths there that were said, many of them under oath, so I would point you to those and the many other real questions that I hope you all will pursue."

FREDRIK FAKE NEWS WAKE UP !

OBAMAGATE

DT fjerne kollibratørene som ble innplassert av Barak "do nothing" Obama


Trump fires Steve Linick, Obama appointee who briefed Congress on Biden-Ukraine ties
President Trump on Friday night fired the State Department’s inspector general, saying in a letter to Congress that he no longer had confidence in the Obama administration appointee.

The president’s letter did not mention Steve Linick by name but said his removal would take effect in 30 days, The Associated Press reported.

Linick, a former assistant U.S. attorney in California and Virginia who has held the IG position since 2013, had overseen reports that were highly critical of the State Department's management policies since Trump took office.

Jhabba/Nikab,Osten, Morten Y; Se og lær fra denne videoen;

Video link:https://video.foxnews.com/v/6157033920001

og denne BIDENGATE videoen;
Video link:https://video.foxnews.com/v/6157060426001

Fredrik fake news , WAKE UP

Får du ikke vondt i fingrene av denne hamringa på tastaturet ?

BIDENGATE
Joe Biden’s virtual campaign for president is a strange journey, with “virtual rallies” and “virtual rope lines” (whatever that is). It also includes a virtual press corps that routinely fails to offer any real scrutiny.
Biden gets to babble into gaffes in three-minute answers, while White House reporters barely let the president finish a sentence before yelling some more.

This is the “journalism” pattern that all of America can see, from the Obama years to the Trump years. One side isn’t so much questioned as adored. The other side isn’t so much questioned as condemned.

CNN is so transparently partisan that they’re now refusing to air the White House briefings with new press secretary Kayleigh McEnany….after CNN media reporter Brian Stelter spent a year lecturing that the old press secretary Stephanie Grisham never called a press briefing.

FAke News media/ fredrik fake news mm . Se og lær fra denne videosnutten

link:https://video.foxnews.com/v/6156919113001